Post your experience with racism here

Rob Roy said:

I did answer the question. I just answered in a way that has befuddled you.

If you are asking what I think of the slavery perpetrated on Africans by white people in the USA in the past, I'd say it was horrible.

I'd also say, I believe I'd have disobeyed the laws then and helped people to escape slavery. I do it now too.

Click to expand...

and what if these people that you helped escape wanted a bite to eat, but the restaurant wanted to refuse them service based on skin color. What side would you fall on ?

londonfog said:

and what if these people that you helped escape wanted a bite to eat, but the restaurant wanted to refuse them service based on skin color. What side would you fall on ?

Click to expand...

I wouldn't rely on forcing others to perform acts I think are charitable. I'd do it myself.

Why? It is inconsistent to help ONE person escape slavery and then forcibly demand ANOTHER person do as I tell them to.

I fall on the side of freedom, how people use it is their choice.

Rob Roy said:

I wouldn't rely on forcing others to perform acts I think are charitable. I'd do it myself.

Why? It is inconsistent to help ONE person escape slavery and then forcibly demand ANOTHER person do as I tell them to.

I fall on the side of freedom, how people use it is their choice.

Click to expand...

You would help free a person from slavery then tell him he can't eat at a certain restaurant ?

londonfog said:

You would help free a person from slavery then tell him he can't eat at a certain restaurant ?

Click to expand...

No, I would tell him, he owns himself, but he doesn't own other people or their property.

I can't make another person serve somebody against their will, apparently you can.

Rob Roy said:

No, I would tell him, he owns himself, but he doesn't own other people or their property.

I can't make another person serve somebody against their will, apparently you can.

Click to expand...

how did these people get their property ? Was it taken from natives ?

londonfog said:

nah just the poor white trash that supports racism. You know the one's who think only black people eat fried chicken and watermelon. The ones who support hatred based on the next mans color. The ones who think they should have the right to refuse service to someone based on skin color.

Click to expand...

londonfog said:

racism was started by whom. Lets see how honest you can be. What group of people started this thing we call racism.

Click to expand...

The rhetoric of racism was created by the elite as one of many topics to cause division in the populist. Government (owned by elite) distribution of race propaganda to the masses by way of, legal legislation, advertisement propaganda and religious doctrines.
Basically it is an invention to divert the 99% of the world that struggles to survive from the fact that 1% owns everything. Wars could not be faught if we all got along.

londonfog said:

how did these people get their property ? Was it taken from natives ?

Click to expand...

Sometimes.

I see on one hand you are admonishing forced interactions, but on the other you continue to champion them. Why is that?

Rob Roy said:

Sometimes.

I see on one hand you are admonishing forced interactions, but on the other you continue to champion them. Why is that?

Click to expand...

I guess the same reason you would free slaves, but then support them being refused service, at a place of business open to the PUBLIC

Off to the library with my son.

londonfog said:

racism was started by whom. Lets see how honest you can be. What group of people started this thing we call racism.

Click to expand...

Here's a good question..how far back in history can we find traces of racism? According to Wiki( you know it's always right...):https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism#History

Somewhere around the 3rd to 5th century, in the Babylonian Talmud, which was written by Jews living in the areas now know as Iraq..so middle eastern jews? But that's only the oldest known reference to racism in an ethnic context. There are writing from Aristotle in the 300's BC talking about difference between Greeks and "barbarians", but the lines were drawn on geography, rather than race. I'd be willing to bet it's deep seated and goes back to primitive man and survival competition between tribes...but I'm no scientist, i just stayed at a motel 6.

londonfog said:

I guess the same reason you would free slaves, but then support them being refused service, at a place of business open to the PUBLIC

Click to expand...

The problem with your assessment is it is inconsistent and incorrect.

First you say forcing a person to interact with you (slavery) is wrong, then you say it is acceptable when you say a person must use their body and property to serve another person.

I believe in both instances, the force used makes the interactions wrong.

So, we do NOT share the same reasoning, mine is consistent, yours is flippy floppy.

londonfog said:

Do you resist learning always ? Try again and google Institutional racism.

Click to expand...

As you said you mentioned it show the proof numb nuts

desert dude said:

Some reading for you, LF:

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/why-we-should-question-the-term-institutional-racism-10119000.html

David Horowicz has quite a lot to say about institutional racism as well, LF. Have you ever read his thoughts on it?

“The doctrine that only whites can be racist is, in fact, itself an instigation to hate crimes. It is a doctrine that has already spread to the secondary schools. The week after the Shepard killing, a Seattle father called a national radio talk show on which I was a guest and told the audience that his son's class in junior high school had been discussing the hate crime concept because of the killing. During the discussion, the teacher informed the class that only heterosexual whites could be racists.”
― David Horowitz, Hating Whitey and Other Progressive Causes

“When I was an undergraduate, the censors attacked the university from without. Now, they are entrenched in the faculties and administrations themselves. Then, the university defined itself as an institution "dedicated to the disinterested pursuit of knowledge." Now, every term of that definition is under siege by postmodernists and deconstructionists who have become the new academic establishment and have redefined the university as "an institution dedicated to social change." That is one reason why the academy, once perceived as a redoubt of intellectual freedom and cutting-edge discourse, has become the butt of snickering jokes about political correctness and the font of Kafkaesque tales about bureaucratic censorship and administrative obtuseness.”
― David Horowitz, Hating Whitey and Other Progressive Causes

Click to expand...

you just cited a guy who says blacks should be more grateful for slavery.

in fact, he was one of the speakers for "preserving western civilization", right alongside such white supremacists as jared taylor and philippe rushton.

damn, you are dumb as fuck, even for a white supremacist.

try finding someone to cite who isn't a white supremacist you dumb shit.

Rob Roy said:

Some very early racism may be a vestigial leftover from early mans development and a fear of "strangers", people that looked different than your clan or tribe.

Click to expand...

wow, you are even dumber than i thought.

the evolutionary racism you propose has been more than thoroughly debunked.

newborns show no preference for their own racial group in any way.

racism is learned, you dumb racist shit. it is not innate, as you seem to think.

Rob Roy said:

The problem with your assessment is it is inconsistent and incorrect.

First you say forcing a person to interact with you (slavery) is wrong, then you say it is acceptable when you say a person must use their body and property to serve another person.

I believe in both instances, the force used makes the interactions wrong.

So, we do NOT share the same reasoning, mine is consistent, yours is flippy floppy.

Click to expand...

the only thing consistent about your philosophy is that it is racist.

you believe in refusing service to people based on their skin color and race. please explain to me how that is not racist.

UncleBuck said:

wow, you are even dumber than i thought.

the evolutionary racism you propose has been more than thoroughly debunked.

newborns show no preference for their own racial group in any way.

racism is learned, you dumb racist shit. it is not innate, as you seem to think.

Click to expand...

I didn't propose evolutionary racism numb nuts. I proposed one reason some people may have developed racist attitudes was in pre history there was often inter culture raping and pillaging. Sometimes the rapists and pillagers physically looked different than the people they victimized.

You should put the bottle down, before your wife gets home and finds out you haven't done the dishes.

Rob Roy said:

I'm going to show some mercy on you dipshit and consider NOT coming back to this latest back and forth and point out your obvious dunce cap.

I've got to go, but I'll be back. Get on the dishes and why isn't the laundry folded?

Click to expand...

when you come back, please answer.

you believe in refusing service to people based on their skin color and race. please explain to me how that is not racist.

londonfog said:

nah just the poor white trash that supports racism. You know the one's who think only black people eat fried chicken and watermelon. The ones who support hatred based on the next mans color. The ones who think they should have the right to refuse service to someone based on skin color.

Click to expand...

The ones who claim all black guys have big dicks? The ones who claim they can identify a black person just by their writings? Those racists?

Pinworm said:

@fssalaska is my new bitch. Do you guys like what he is wearing? Or shall I make him change it up?

View attachment 3451690

Click to expand...

i like it.

sheskunk said:

The ones who claim all black guys have big dicks? The ones who claim they can identify a black person just by their writings? Those racists?

Click to expand...

i identified you as FDD just by your writing, and i also correctly identified that you have a tiny, microscopic, even nanoscopic, flaccid penis.