potroastV2
Well-Known Member
It's pathetic that you actually think you're paying attention!
No regres
- Thread starter SmokeyDan
- Start date
SmokeyDan
Well-Known Member
I've heard the same story I've already laid out all the way through.
But I'm blown away with how little it matters.
It makes no difference to whether or not it was a good shoot if he knew MB was the one who robbed the store when he first saw them or if it took Wilson a few minutes to figure out
Hazydat620
Well-Known Member
Admit what? that the GJ didn't properly do their job? It was not a trial. They should have indicted on the simple fact that there was so many conflicting stories and fumbling of the investigative process(batteries dead in the camera). It should have gone to trial and be sorted by the courts, not decided based on a one sided account of what happened, that was never challenged by someone with a law degree. If this is how you like our justice system ran , because it suits the outcome you want? Or just until it doesn't work for you?
Hazydat620
Well-Known Member
It doesn't amaze me that you think lying doesn't matter one bit, or getting a story straight. I feel the prosecute didn't either, hence the decision made by the grand jury. Damn you think some swishers are a good reason to shoot and kill someone. IMO it doesn't even look like he stole the swishers, looks like to me he tried to pay for them, when the clerk asked for a ID he didn't have, well then fuck you(even looked like he threw money down.), yeah definitely deserves to die.
jahbrudda
Well-Known Member
I've been through a GJ,have you?
Grand juries have been a part of our judicial process for well over a hundred years.
Just because you don't understand basic procedural law doesn't mean shit.
Your comment that "it should not decided based on a one sided account of what happened, that was never challenged by someone with a law degree" demonstrates your ignorance of our legal system.
Many witnesses gave testimony that backed up the officers account of events and given the high profile status of this tragedy, the intervention of the feds and the massive social outcry, common sense would dictate that the evidence had to be overwhelmingly in favor of the officer.
So get over it, the lefts lynch mob mentality, fortunately, did not prevail this time.
jahbrudda
Well-Known Member
Not once did you bring up the fact that the witnesses could have been lying, you are totally bias and everyone can see it.
Hazydat620
Well-Known Member
You are making my point for me, thank you dummy. It should have gone to trial so lawyers, defense and prosecution, could have cross examined each and every witness, including DW. Should only the witnesses that didn't corroborate DW story be discredited? Nice bias shithead.
SmokeyDan
Well-Known Member
So it isn't stealing when you can't legally purchase?
It is state law in every state that you have to ID people for tobacco. If they don't have it you cannot legally sell to them.
Anyway, it's easy to Monday morning quarterback these things.
We've heard dozens of the versions of events from dozens of people. Things get crossed and confusing.
I don't automatically assume that when people say something that is wrong that they are lying.
Hazydat620
Well-Known Member
Let's hope you never have children and he decides to steal something with his friends.
Do you think Brown would still be dead if he had done everything the cop had told him to do?
Hazydat620
Well-Known Member
Because I have a different view of what defending and prosecuting is, that makes me ignorant? I think you're more ignorant for thinking that the prosecutor presented a case that would win him a indictment.
SmokeyDan
Well-Known Member
MB isn't dead because he stole cigars.
He is dead because he attacked a cop, and instead of running away decided to try and come back and finish him off.
He killed himself.
Hazydat620
Well-Known Member
He ran away 100' after realizing he made a mistake, DW had no reason to leave his vehicle and give foot chase. Police are supposed to be smarter than that, setting a example. They are setting examples that it is alright to shoot unarmed people.
A trial would have just been a huge media event and the outcome would have been exactly the same. The witness statements are overwhelmingly in support of Wilson, the forensic evidence is in support of Wilson, the physical evidence is in support of Wilson. The video evidence shows Brown engaged in theft and violence over a few bucks in cigars. Then you would just have more people pissed that millions of dollars of taxpayer money was wasted on a theater production. The GJ did their job, and they spent a huge amount of time deliberating over the decision and saved the taxpayers millions, unfortunately the looters and the arsonists and the killers see it as an opportunity to get free stuff, show us all how angry they are, while the real protestors watch with horror at what has happened. Its crappy what black people have to put up with sometimes, there is a divide in this nation and our leaders don't seem to want to make it better, they use it as opportunity to make political gains, shameful. I wholeheartedly agree that police are extremely biased against blacks, why? Is it really racism or is it experiences?
What kind of person shoves an old lady for a few dollars worth of cigars? Do you condone theft, robbery, underage tobacco use, violence, and disrespect to others as good lifestyle choices, or do you think there is something wrong with that behavior?
You have your facts wrong, he ran less than 25 feet away. If you have one fact wrong, chances are you are basing your opinion on other incorrect facts also.
Yeah, you can shoot an unarmed person if they are trying to kill you. It's in the books.
Hazydat620
Well-Known Member
Condone, no, send his ass to jail, like I give a fuk. Too many times I have seen surveillance video of suspects on the evening news. DW got a pretty good look at him after the assault, he couldn't find him again? pick him out of a year book from the local school and get a address for his home after seeing a doctor, if he was so injured? Shit probably would have caught him at the hospital considering he knew MB was hit, since he had blood all over his persons. MB could have had charges of strong arm robbery, assaulting a police officer, and evading police. Probably would have spent a nice chunk of time in jail. But DW decided to be judge jury and executioner. DW wasn't going to let MB slip through the cracks of the justice system and decided that death was was justice for 2 crimes. That is what I think is wrong with the picture here. It seems like you condone the killing of unarmed because it is easier and cheaper than going through the courts.
Hazydat620
Well-Known Member
He didn't die 30 yrds from the Tahoe? I don't care how far away he was from DW when he was shot.
jahbrudda
Well-Known Member
How in the hell does cop know if the thug is unarmed, how about the testimony that Brown reached under his shirt into his waistband?
All of this took place in under 90 seconds and the armchair quarterbacks keep frothing at the mouth.
jahbrudda
Well-Known Member
He had a blood trail moving towards the cop of over 20', what does that tell you?