New Dispensary Bill

T

tomcatjones

Active Member
Rising Moon said:
Progress is progress.

Whats more important to me than protecting some un known variables, is patients rights, and for the sick to have access to this plant.

And as I read the bill. It does a pretty good job of regulating and protecting our rights.

Municipal bans can be over turned...
Click to expand...
the bill in question does nothing for patients rights. it actually begins to limit the amounts they can purchase in a given period.

patients already can obtain from any source... even a 4 yr old. and that is protected we know that.

now i had posted some things from SB 420 dealing with patient rights, like the right to use or even have a hearing for those facing probation or bond while being patients, related charges or not. they have the right to use.

and some judges allow it, i've seen most do very well.. but some do not! *cough* oakland county *cough* and some of the rural areas up north still have patients pleading to possession cuz their court appointed or small town lawyers dont know any better or want more job security.

not exactly follow equal protection are we?? -find me a lawyer who will fight on those grounds though.. you wont. just like repping a black man in '62


i'm all for dispensaries, farmers markets and the like. save havens for medical use, whatever.....

but we're in this to keep people away from jail, and provide for all. not 1/4 the state. -hypothetically if this passed: I can transfer meds to a provisioning center...they then get to RESELL.. why can i not provide same meds to a cancer suffer, free treatment or not of RSO without section 8?

something is wrong here and it all is about the money.

the merchant class is fucking us over again.

-municipal bans can be over turned, yes - with local effort and support. same with regulations and fees they might make them be low... or VERY hard to get. /shrug.
 
Murfy

Murfy

Well-Known Member
great article-

Known as the first chiropractor to be elected to the Michigan Legislature, Callton adjusts the spines of other legislators at his Lansing office during breaks from House sessions, and he's active on the House Health Policy Committee.

"I see medical marijuana as a health care issue. I know a lot of people -- I have patients -- who have clearly benefited" from medical marijuana, he said.
Click to expand...
the article clearly amkes distinctive the phrase "--i have patients--". i wonder if the Callton spoke it this way? implying he has MM patients?
 
Murfy

Murfy

Well-Known Member
im starting to back up -

on this a bit. need to do more reading. but it's not the fact munic's can ordinance against it.

it's the fact that it doesn't open back up the the p2p and c2p transfers. only transferring of overages will be done to provisioning centers. and mom and pop will have all the restrictions(such as not located on residential property), as a full on disp.

this will allow only the established and funded, to operate these facilities. they will , of course set the pace. meaning the grower now gets shit for his meds, due to the fact he only has one choice for transfers, and that's the disp circuit. meanwhile starving farmer's meds(which he toiled at) are being sold to the masses fro the famous 20 a gram.

i don't like it. this bill, for some reason has eight(8) repub, co sponsors. what in the fuck is goin on here?
 
T

tomcatjones

Active Member
Murfy said:
im starting to back up -

on this a bit. need to do more reading. but it's not the fact munic's can ordinance against it.

it's the fact that it doesn't open back up the the p2p and c2p transfers. only transferring of overages will be done to provisioning centers. and mom and pop will have all the restrictions(such as not located on residential property), as a full on disp.

this will allow only the established and funded, to operate these facilities. they will , of course set the pace. meaning the grower now gets shit for his meds, due to the fact he only has one choice for transfers, and that's the disp circuit. meanwhile starving farmer's meds(which he toiled at) are being sold to the masses fro the famous 20 a gram.

i don't like it. this bill, for some reason has eight(8) repub, co sponsors. what in the fuck is goin on here?
Click to expand...
dispenseraries are guaranteed a product line not created by them... why? because I grow medicine.. they effectively are making us all employees...

not cool.
 
st0wandgrow

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
Murfy said:
im starting to back up -

on this a bit. need to do more reading. but it's not the fact munic's can ordinance against it.

it's the fact that it doesn't open back up the the p2p and c2p transfers. only transferring of overages will be done to provisioning centers. and mom and pop will have all the restrictions(such as not located on residential property), as a full on disp.

this will allow only the established and funded, to operate these facilities. they will , of course set the pace. meaning the grower now gets shit for his meds, due to the fact he only has one choice for transfers, and that's the disp circuit. meanwhile starving farmer's meds(which he toiled at) are being sold to the masses fro the famous 20 a gram.

i don't like it. this bill, for some reason has eight(8) repub, co sponsors. what in the fuck is goin on here?
Click to expand...
I agree murfy. Something stinks here. Anytime you get 8 republicans lined up at the trough something is fishy.

This is looking like a sell-out to big business interests.
 
TheMan13

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
st0wandgrow said:
I agree murfy. Something stinks here. Anytime you get 8 republicans lined up at the trough something is fishy.

This is looking like a sell-out to big business interests.
Click to expand...
It's all about the synergy of politics my friend. The only winners here are the power of government and the income of lawyers. I've always found Democrats and lawyers to be quite odd bed fellows ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top