New Dispensary Bill
- Thread starter Murfy
- Start date
bloodytrichomes
New Member
fuck i dont feel safe with my grandmother going to walmart
mancelonaman
Member
Sec10 3 b ii
Timmahh
Well-Known Member
the proper way to dissect this bill would be one section at a time. I gave it a fairly good surface read. I see some things that absolutely need to be changed, or further defined, or troubles will certainly ensue. First and foremost, off the top of my head, one of the main Facets of this bill should be to ensure its subservience to the MMM Act of 08. That is to codify this Dispensary Bill, looks to the 08 MMM Act for its foundation.
Wording along the line of
"Any Language contained within this Dispensary Act of 2013, does not present legal precedence over the 2008 Michigan Medical Marihuana Act in any manner. Let it be made clear, the 2008 MMM Act is the Defining Law in the State of Michigan, and this Dispensary Act of 2013, in no way usurps the Standing of the MMM Act of 2008, and infact, only stands as support OF the 2008 Michigan Medical Marihuana Act. By enacting this Dispensary Bill into Law, it is hereafter clear, the 2008 MMM Act is the Foudational law that gives this Dispensary Act Legal Credence, and this Dispensary bill is a Fully Subservient Law to the 2008 Michigan Medical Marihuana Act."
Ensure this Dispensary bill can in NO WAY be interpreted to Take Precedence over, or Trump the Legal Standing of the 2008 MMM Act.
and of course to also ensure this Bill in no way prohibits any Registered or Non Registered by Dr Recommended Patient or Primary Caregiver to Manufacture, Deliver, Cultivate, Transfer or grow cannabis for medical use, by any State, County or Local Authority not authorized by the 2008 MMM Act.
Wording along the line of
"Any Language contained within this Dispensary Act of 2013, does not present legal precedence over the 2008 Michigan Medical Marihuana Act in any manner. Let it be made clear, the 2008 MMM Act is the Defining Law in the State of Michigan, and this Dispensary Act of 2013, in no way usurps the Standing of the MMM Act of 2008, and infact, only stands as support OF the 2008 Michigan Medical Marihuana Act. By enacting this Dispensary Bill into Law, it is hereafter clear, the 2008 MMM Act is the Foudational law that gives this Dispensary Act Legal Credence, and this Dispensary bill is a Fully Subservient Law to the 2008 Michigan Medical Marihuana Act."
Ensure this Dispensary bill can in NO WAY be interpreted to Take Precedence over, or Trump the Legal Standing of the 2008 MMM Act.
and of course to also ensure this Bill in no way prohibits any Registered or Non Registered by Dr Recommended Patient or Primary Caregiver to Manufacture, Deliver, Cultivate, Transfer or grow cannabis for medical use, by any State, County or Local Authority not authorized by the 2008 MMM Act.
Murfy
Well-Known Member
st0wandgrow
Well-Known Member
I have to admit that I'm a little skeptical of this considering it's a Republican introducing the legislation. Their primary motive always seems to be what's best for big business, so I can't help but thinking that this guy has some ulterior motives.
I'd love to know who this Representatives big donors were in the last couple election cycles .....
TheMan13
Well-Known Member
Don't assume "Republican" means social conservative. Many Libertarians (Ron Paul & Gary Johnson) fly the Republican flag and are the most hardened MJ supporters we have nationwide.
st0wandgrow
Well-Known Member
This is true. I'm just skeptical of any politician that appears to be doing something good for the people. There is usually a money motive behind it.
TheMan13
Well-Known Member
I hear ya brother. The 12 day 2.5 ounce waiting limit caught my eye. I don't get the game there for sure.
Dr. Bob
Well-Known Member
Do folks think dispensaries should be allowed to grow themselves, or should they be required to obtain their meds from Michigan caregivers with overages? If so, how do folks propose making sure said Michigan caregivers supply their patients first and the dispensaries second?
No motivations here, just a question and would like to hear the thoughts of the board.
Dr. Bob
No motivations here, just a question and would like to hear the thoughts of the board.
Dr. Bob
this is good you braught this up, i had a patient get ahold of me a couple months back about this very question, "they stated they signed a caregiver, because they where very ill and unable to grow for them selfs, in the 6 months they had this caregiver they never got an oz from them".. he was selling it all to the dispenserys and they where left without meds...
to me this is bullshit!
i am a legal caregiver in michigan and have never once gotten rid of overages to a dispensery.. my patients come first! i always make sure they have there limit,, and i have there limit on hand
tricloud
New Member
Why would it matter if the dispensary supplies itself or if it gets its meds outsourced. You still can only have 12 plants per patient and 5 patients. As long as those 5 patients get what they need what does it matter?
Seems to me a dispensary that grows it's own has much better control on quality then relying on random growers. Especially if the dispensaries have to get their meds tested....
This way customers would know what to expect. Different growers growing the same exact clone will often come up with 2 very different final products.
If this passes expect to see a Tricloud Genetics Dispensary that sells everything Tricloud does and everything else thats worth growing.
Won't be able to supply it by myself but i'll get growers who know what they are doing and grow organically to help. Already have them lined up....