My 2 cents on profit for caregivers

Cory and trevor said:

THC is being found to be less medically useful then CBD by most people in the field of mental health. CBD is thought now to counteract the "paranoia" friihtening effects and could lead someday to a use as an anti-psychotic. it's combinations of all the canabanoids of a plant profile that create a high/stone hence the sativa indica seperation; their ratios in pure forms of indica or sativa are similar in effect and canabinoid profile to each other. Indica stone sativa high. P.S. the feds "legalized" it but wouldn't sell the stamps that were eluded to in the law to people without proof of having crop; then if you tried to prove you had crop to make it legal and get your stamp BOOM busted for having it without a stamp. I got a good book for you bob: Columbus and other lies my history teach told me. check it out. Got a pot verson too. Love you bob....

Click to expand...

The other problem with this description of cbd, is that it's talking mental disorder...that's a different clinical area than neurological disorder. I know I know..sounds like splitting hairs. But it's a distinct difference, clinically speaking.

Similar to the previous attempt to show cbd effective against spasms (hence Parkinson's) Spasms are caused by muscle/skeletal problems...the actual cause is in the muscle,or bone. Tremors and seizures are caused by neurological disorders.. causes in the brain. it sounds like splitting hairs..but it's a big difference in application.

As Ron White would say..it's not THAT the muscle twitches, it's WHY the muscle twitches.

You guys want to bash me for splitting hairs...that's not what I'm doing. I'm differentiating..it's not meant to piss you off...but it's important in the context of the discussion...Does that make sense to you?

bob harris is more than 1-

inalienable, means legal. catch me if you can.
does that give youa hint who i am. cause i think i know oyu.

I yield to Bob Harris' s large American penis. You piss is much greater then my own, bow out now as you are giant in the pants and the brain. You are the winner.

Cory and trevor said:

I yield to Bob Harris' s large American penis. You piss is much greater then my own, bow out now as you are giant in the pants and the brain. You are the winner.

Click to expand...

It's got nothing to do with a large penis, or pissing. It's got to do with with accurate information, and responsible actions.

Personally, I'd rather have a small penis that I get to use with women, than a large one I have to stroke myself.

bullshit-

the first thing a girl looks at is the package. bro.

how you think i got with that chick in my avatar.
franken pen is.

Murfy said:

bullshit-

the first thing a girl looks at is the package. bro.

how you think i got with that chick in my avatar.
franken pen is.

Click to expand...

That depends on the chicks your after...some are certainly of the "bigger is better" mindset.
just like some cannabis grower think "bigger is better' when it comes to bud.

The people in the know, on either front, are the ones looking for quality over quantity.

In the end, an oz of my wispy little sativa buds, weigh the same as an oz of Giant Indica buds. An oz is an oz. The question becomes..which one is of better value.

The first thing a stoner looking for weed sees is bag appeal. The fist thing a med user looking for relief wants to know, is if the effect of the med will help their condition, regardless of bag appeal.

Murph, you like hot rods, muscle cars, right?

Think of it this way.

You can build a 600hp monster, but without good suspension and traction....all you got is smoke and noise.
A car with less horse power, that has traction, makes less smoke and noise, while it leaves the high horse power car in the dust...

So, are you looking for horsepower...or to cover the 1/4 mile quicker?

Me? I prefer GO over SHOW.

wrong-

you couldn't be more wrong. while you think this, your old lady checks out my package every time.
and also.

just cause they're sativa's, doesn't mean they have to be wispy. if you weren't such adick i'd show ya.

my old lady just said the same thing-

quality, is what matters she says. NOW.

while i'm showing her the way, all she says is ow, ow , ow.LOL

Murfy said:

wrong-

you couldn't be more wrong. while you think this, your old lady checks out my package every time.
and also.

just cause they're sativa's, doesn't mean they have to be wispy. if you weren't such adick i'd show ya.

Click to expand...

Sure, everyone wonders about the showy package, they wonder if all that show can be backed up by performance. They may even take the showy package for a test drive. But they'll come back to performance over show.

Now if your old lady like pain with her sex, I can fuck her twice and hit her with a rock.

sativa buds do tend to be smaller..at least true sativa's. I call mine wispy because the "bigger are better' guys are going to criticize them any ways.

Actually, the "density" is fine...an oz of my small buds often is smaller in size that an oz of big buds. Kinda like and oz of gold, is smaller than an oz of aluminum...They weigh exactly the same...but one is bigger.

bad genetics?-

don't worry, it happens all the time.

she doesn't like the pain. i do.

Murfy said:

bad genetics?-

don't worry, it happens all the time.

she doesn't like the pain. i do.

Click to expand...

Great genetics...landrace genetics. Not Sativa genetics, crossed with Indica to shorten flower time and control Height. Pure, sativa genetics.

bob harris said:

Sure, everyone wonders about the showy package, they wonder if all that show can be backed up by performance. They may even take the showy package for a test drive. But they'll come back to performance over show.

Now if your old lady like pain with her sex, I can fuck her twice and hit her with a rock.

sativa buds do tend to be smaller..at least true sativa's. I call mine wispy because the "bigger are better' guys are going to criticize them any ways.

Actually, the "density" is fine...an oz of my small buds often is smaller in size that an oz of big buds. Kinda like and oz of gold, is smaller than an oz of aluminum...They weigh exactly the same...but one is bigger.

Click to expand...

Yeah, with you Bob it is obviously always about pissing, penis size and last words.

i wasn'tt alkina bout the -

plants.

Cory and trevor said:

Yeah, with you Bob it is obviously always about pissing, penis size and last words.

Click to expand...

LOL..I just love it when you point at me, and describe yourself.

So..now you have a choice....you can stfu...and have a small victory in giving me the last word. Or you can come up with another hit and run no value comment...which would just further prove my point.

Check Mate....

Kids, LOL!

bob harris said:

So, a legitimate pain med patient..let's say for cancer, using pharmaceutical pain management, should be able to go to his doctor and say "Doc, that oxy is working great..can you up my scrip so I can start having fun?"

Quite simply, we are taking about medical use in a medical forum......When has recreational use ever entered into the traditional medical field?

When recreational use enters the field of prescription, traditional pharmaceuticals...people go to jail..and doctors lose their licenses. Why should medical cannabis be any different?

You making a legalize argument, not a medical argument. Different forum..

Click to expand...

because medical cannabis should be free for all to grow in there backyard. and in large quantity.

your scenario starts out with a cancer pain patient... well cannabis works great for that as we all know, pain, appetite, etc.

but if there were LESS restrictions - we could get to the point where cancer isn't a problem, ever!

cannabis cures cancer and holding the cure back is more criminal than a few people smoking it.

rather them smoke than drink alcohol.

tomcatjones said:

because medical cannabis should be free for all to grow in there backyard. and in large quantity.

your scenario starts out with a cancer pain patient... well cannabis works great for that as we all know, pain, appetite, etc.

but if there were LESS restrictions - we could get to the point where cancer isn't a problem, ever!

cannabis cures cancer and holding the cure back is more criminal than a few people smoking it.

rather them smoke than drink alcohol.

Click to expand...

Hello? The Feds are criminals, they live off MJ, LOL!

tomcatjones said:

because medical cannabis should be free for all to grow in there backyard. and in large quantity.

your scenario starts out with a cancer pain patient... well cannabis works great for that as we all know, pain, appetite, etc.

but if there were LESS restrictions - we could get to the point where cancer isn't a problem, ever!

cannabis cures cancer and holding the cure back is more criminal than a few people smoking it.

rather them smoke than drink alcohol.

Click to expand...

I don't know of any studies that concludes cannabis cures cancer. I know of many that point to the fact it helps. And if we get to the point where it's legal for all to grow in their backyard in large quantities..well that would be great...but it would reduce the value of cannabis to that of one of it's nick names.."grass'.....I'll give you all the grass clippings from my lawn that you want..hell, I'll pay you to haul them away.

bob harris said:

I don't know of any studies that concludes cannabis cures cancer. I know of many that point to the fact it helps. And if we get to the point where it's legal for all to grow in their backyard in large quantities..well that would be great...but it would reduce the value of cannabis to that of one of it's nick names.."grass'.....I'll give you all the grass clippings from my lawn that you want..hell, I'll pay you to haul them away.

Click to expand...

I disagree, the best growers will have a market, the hacks will fail, just like everything else.

Hello Bob? You there?