lower tuition for illegals

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
so you think just because someone comes here pops out a child that child is now able to get a bunch of numbers to say they are a citizen here?

the wife usually has the rights to say what is moderation in that case
I do not have a wife. Are you seriously suggesting that if I had sex, that would be out of bounds? On what reasoning? cn
 

Trousers

Well-Known Member
forgot a word. set in there in caps. eighth grade or not i had mine in 10th cant believe i had to wait that long.
Any person born in the United States of America is a citizen. That is the law. I am sorry you are unable to understand this and it causes you pain.
 

silasraven

Well-Known Member
That's a potentially self-contradictory response. Can I invite you to expand, to reconcile with what you have said so far? cn
you never said that the women is from here or not. child or not from sex. so from the info you gave me your still clear for take off
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
you never said that the women is from here or not. child or not from sex. so from the info you gave me your still clear for take off
I asked you who are the judges of sexual moderation and your response was "the wife". By implication you've disapproved of all sex outside a marriage containing at least one woman. Your logical edifice seems out of square from my vantage. cn
 

silasraven

Well-Known Member
I asked you who are the judges of sexual moderation and your response was "the wife". By implication you've disapproved of all sex outside a marriage containing at least one woman. Your logical edifice seems out of square from my vantage. cn
yes sex outside of marriage is a little unsettling. dont start seca, please. yes most people view sex outside marriage is ok. my view comes from the experience. it wasnt as gratifying as hoped
 

Trousers

Well-Known Member
yes sex outside of marriage is a little unsettling. dont start seca, please. yes most people view sex outside marriage is ok. my view comes from the experience. it wasnt as gratifying as hoped

Then you did it wrong.
This seems like a reoccurring theme in your life.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
which is why i keep to my view sex before marriage isnt for me.
But here's the thing. The statement from you that drew me in was "Limiting sex is not bad."

There it is, declarative and unqualified. You assume the duty of defending it as stated. No revisions, qualifications, circumscriptions. Don't nudge the goalposts when you think we're not looking. I was hoping for something like a debate by the rules of reason. You've established the premise, and i have been questioning it. You can't just change what you're saying. you have to prevail by the rules of debate, or you are duty-bound to expressly and formally retract, yes, to declare that you weren't right.
So let's have at it then. I challenge your bold claim, and ask that you back it up with an acceptable source, one not drawing at its core upon "revealed truth", which i hold to be neither. cn
 
Top