That doesn't make any sense. If they are entrenched the moment they are elected, then what's the difference? All that means is a new person is going to screw up for a few years while we train a new one.
I couldn't disagree more. I think politicians of average intelligence are exactly the problem.
Fair enough. I didn't come here to discuss run of the mill politicians; I respect your opinion. All I really care about is Prop 19 in 2010. The rest is all just window dressing.
Wish he would have done that 2 weeks ago.
Presented in the right way, legalization would pass, nationally. If it were over regulated as 19 wants to do, every argument mentioned here, would bury such a move in Congress. I think if Obama gets reelected in 2012, there might be a chance for Barney Frank to shove through a decent bill.The latest national poll numbers from Gallup, which has been tracking public opinion on cannabis legalization since the late 1960s, shows that Americans’ support for ‘making marijuana legal’ is now at its highest reported level of support ever.
Prop 19 ate my lunch.
hey, i posted that in the "lie about prop 19 thread". no reason to label ME stupid.Prop 19 ate my lunch.
No, the best lies are full of truths like that.
from what all my local news channels in the bay area are saying, YES, that is what i am getting at. but see i didn't just pull this out of my ass. i am repeating what is being discussed among politicians. at least the ones they are interviewing.No, the best lies are full of truths like that.
Lies have to be squeezed in. Usually just after or before, an emotionally stimulating sentence or topic, like your child's lunch.
Such tactics are meant for knee jerk reactions, and I find them comically void of sustenance.
Or, do really consider that a viable threat?
If so, then you believe the feds will cut funding to kids to teach the rebellious adults a lesson.
I'm not brushing you off, sir.from what all my local news channels in the bay area are saying, YES, that is what i am getting at. but see i didn't just pull this out of my ass. i am repeating what is being discussed among politicians. at least the ones they are interviewing.
so brush me off as a whack job lying. doesn't really bother me. i'll just turn on channel 4 for my news.
When I had kids in school, neither "qaulified" for that stupid lunch program anyway. I made squat and they still told me that was too much. I saw the kids that did get it, and made my mind up that it was totally mismanaged. I just stepped up to the plate and paid for the food MY children would eat instead of relying on a handout.from what all my local news channels in the bay area are saying, YES, that is what i am getting at. but see i didn't just pull this out of my ass. i am repeating what is being discussed among politicians. at least the ones they are interviewing.
so brush me off as a whack job lying. doesn't really bother me. i'll just turn on channel 4 for my news.
Neither do I.i don't rely on polls to base my opinions.
I sincerely apologize, my mistake.
The feds are going to starve poor children because CA voters did not vote as they were told. I can just see Obama doing that, a Democrat president trying to get reelected in 2012 punishing the voters (not the legislature) of a mostly Democrat state.state school lunch programs are funded with federal money. the feds do not need stormtroopers to attack where it really hurts. they will simply stop funding programs as soon as cali thumbs their nose at them.
that's cool though, we'll all be high so no one will care.
i don't rely on polls to base my opinions.
