Years ago I would have said collectivism vs individualism. The thought that what's best for the collective is what's best for the individual vs what's best for the individual is what's best for the collective.
i'm gonna go out on a limb and say the 'what can you do for me' in your mind is the pubster and of course, leave me alone the dem..correct?
The fact that you are bitching about the "audacity" of a business to want to hire people who make them profitable backs up my claims more than yours. I know you'll never see it that way though so we'll just have to agree to disagree here. Don't know why you think businesses should run charities for shitty employees.
whoa! did i hit a nerve?
considering the CASH money he pockets, his employees should be making $15/hour for the type of work they do around those chemicals, steam and heat..but i'm sure they're making around $8.05/hour (or less if they're illegal)..because he can get away with it..amirite?
One steals shit out of your left pocket and one steals shit out of your right pocket.
Aren't historical facts a pain in the ass, especially if you are a Republican.lincoln's all time low was 1.64% approval rating.
and how did that work out for him being the 'worst' this country has seen in his time?
same shit, different era.
surprising that john q. didn't make the top ten:
1 Abraham Lincoln Republican 1.64 Abolition of slavery, American Civil War leadership
2 Franklin D. Roosevelt Democrat 2 Leadership of World War II and Great Depression, forming New Deal Coalition
3 George Washington Federalist-leaning non-partisan 2.81 First President, founder of the Republic, established many precedents
4 Thomas Jefferson Democratic-Republican 4.45 Intellectual leadership, Louisiana Purchase, states-rights
5 Theodore Roosevelt Republican 4.82 Charisma, conservationism, trust-busting "Square Deal," Panama Canal
6 Woodrow Wilson Democrat 6.64 World War I leadership; major legislation
7 Harry S. Truman Democrat 7.1 World War II and Cold War leadership
8 Andrew Jackson Democrat 9.18 Overall effectiveness, charisma, nationalism
9 Dwight Eisenhower Republican 10.7 Cold War leadership, economic prosperity
10 James K. Polk Democrat 11 Mexican-American War leadership
11 John Adams Federalist 12.45
Why anyone on a pot forum bases the success or failure of a congress on how many new laws they pass is beyond me. I'd be fine if they all went home and did absolutely no more damage.
i think it's hysterical, actually, GOP is proving what dems have been saying all along.
especially when they are RESPONSIBLE ie; MADE THE CHOICE of single-digit numbers..oh, i dunno why either
Just admit you like bigger government and being told what to do and then I'll understand your lust for passing new intrusive laws. Otherwise I think you are just looking for reasons to bitch.especially when they are single-digit numbers..oh, i dunno why either
My rebuttal is I want them to pass as few as humanly possible, your rebuttal is they suck for not passing enough.that's your rebuttal?
well that was a spitter..thanks for the laugh!
It's lost on you why people on a pot forum should be more inclined to less laws than more laws... Oh wellwell that was a spitter..thanks for the laugh!
you keep saying 'for a pot forum'..why?
FTW: under-reporting is the most heinous thing an american business owner can do..not only is the 'system rigged' CONFIRMED it is conspiring against the american people as a whole. the tax code is broke and every CPA left/right will tell you same...tax code benefits OVERWHELMINGLY the american business owner and they still feel the need to STUFF their pockets. this translates to short-changing the american people.. you see, GW again, it's math..when you take the number of businesses and their projected taxable income, government projects which ends with deficit BECAUSE:..'keeping more of their own money'? attitude..PSSSST: it's not their money any longer and to those, who in the past, had that thought with their employees withheld? never paid the government?..they are vicious and will hunt you down..'but that is my money' isn't an excuse or my payroll company never made the deposits..it's your responsibility as a business owner!
child labor is covered under the Child Labor Laws which were instituted in the first half of the last century because "the business owners" (you know that guy who's stuffing his pockets 'because he can', right?) had no rules or regs..many children were worked to death or maimed:
why don't you nanny state collectivists leave women alone so they can make their own health care decisions when they are pregnant?
our jobs are in china because there is tax incentive..mr. business owner does not make a move without tax incentive.
oh thank god! i was just about to strangle GW..wtf is wrong with that guy?
