they texted me that the other girl when told i would be there, asked for my hours..um, sewwwwwwwBother the customers with your proselytizing and watch your job disappear.
they texted me that the other girl when told i would be there, asked for my hours..um, sewwwwwwwBother the customers with your proselytizing and watch your job disappear.
that argument only works when you are speaking in terms of personal self..it is PC to ask someone if you may hug or touch them..it is not when you have a store open to the public..no one person should have to ask permission nor shall there be signage of any time of discouragement.Almost. You asked what the least aggressive way (or something like that) for a person that IS a racist to inform someone they weren't welcome.
I've been upfront that MY view is I would not discriminate based on race. We are talking about two sets of circumstances and for your narrative you are conveniently ignoring MY stated view. That's what people do when their argument skills are weak...like yours.
they texted me that the other girl when told i would be there, asked for my hours..um, sewwwwwww
hahhaaa! right?What?
that argument only works when you are speaking in terms of personal self..it is PC to ask someone if you may hug or touch them..it is not when you have a store open to the public..no one person should have to ask permission nor shall there be signage of any time of discouragement.
a business open to the public, is just that.
don't like it? the government understands your pain..open yourself a private 'club' signage 'members only'.
BUT! it shall NOT be public, not ever..
No, whether a person is a racist or not, all people should always own themselves and control their own property and their own body, but not own others or dictate the use of others property or body.You are not a racist
You just support and advocate the same racist positions they do
You are not a pedophile
You just took NAMBLA's mission statement as your own
Legal to grow and possessNo, whether a person is a racist or not, all people should always own themselves and control their own property and their own body, but not own others or dictate the use of others property or body.
You are a mite bit simple, Prohibitionist in some of the failed attempts at logic you use...
Your "logic" - Hey look that dog has four legs, my god my kitchen table has four legs too, maybe it was the table barking so loud last night!!!??
I really think you are frustrated because you've proposed a law that has prohibitions in it and you can't think of a way out of your lame idea. I almost feel sorry for you, Prohibitionist.
You are what is known as a "pedophile enabler".
Stick that on your resume.
Doesn't bother me with the lable.Should he put that part before or after he lists his experience as a police lineup dummy and that he has a penchant for proposing prohibitionist laws?
Doesn't bother me with the lable.
Everyone knows you really are a racist and pedophile
Why do you believe a child can consent to sex with an adult if you are not a pedophile?*label
Well that's interesting. You've made a claim that I'm something based on zero evidence and your flawed comprehension, which in your case could be genetic or due to a psychosis you suffer from due to your feelings of inadequacy etc.
Then...
You've proposed a real live prohibition in a law, (which is self evident) and laughably you claim you're not a Prohibitionist, despite your proposing a law with a main component BEING prohibition.
I'm afraid I can't help you. I apologize for thumping you so hard too, I had made you out for an asinine prick, when it may not be your fault. Again, my apologies and wishes for your eventual recovery.
False dichotomous question.Why do you believe a child can consent to sex with an adult if you are not a pedophile?
Meaning you're shit out of luck? Bernie with a Gatling gun ain't gonna happen. He couldn't even keep two loudmouthed fat girls from taking away his microphonethey texted me that the other girl when told i would be there, asked for my hours..um, sewwwwwww
Claims a label (lable...lol) is ineffectiveDoesn't bother me with the lable.
Then throws out a labelDoesn't bother me with the lable.
Everyone knows you really are a racist and pedophile
it's a fine start.Legal to grow and possess
Illegal to sell
evidence #1: you refuse to state that it should be illegal for adults to have sex with small children, even as young as 8 years old.You've made a claim that I'm something based on zero evidence.
WOWFalse dichotomous question.
I believe a person capable of consenting to an action can consent to an action. If there is a magic age for all people that ability to consent happens at, please tell me which age it is.
I believe a person incapable of consenting to an action cannot consent. Forced consent is not actual consent either, despite any "tacit consent" arguments fools care to make, but I am digressing.
If a person is capable of consenting to something then if I prevent their behavior, I've become a prohibitionist. I don't think I need to explain to you what a Prohibitionist is, do I?
I am not comfortable with some of the things that some people willingly consent to, but I'm not like you and don't think I need to PROHIBIT people from interacting in ways they voluntarily consented to which are none of my business, Prohibitionist.
It's a natural evolutionit's a fine start.
eventually, full regulation and taxation. just like wine. or peas.
some idiots happen to let the perfect be the enemy of the better.It's a natural evolution