Is this really the official website of the enslaved?

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Almost. You asked what the least aggressive way (or something like that) for a person that IS a racist to inform someone they weren't welcome.

I've been upfront that MY view is I would not discriminate based on race. We are talking about two sets of circumstances and for your narrative you are conveniently ignoring MY stated view. That's what people do when their argument skills are weak...like yours.
that argument only works when you are speaking in terms of personal self..it is PC to ask someone if you may hug or touch them..it is not when you have a store open to the public..no one person should have to ask permission nor shall there be signage of any time of discouragement.

a business open to the public, is just that.

don't like it? the government understands your pain..open yourself a private 'club' signage 'members only'.

BUT! it shall NOT be public, not ever..

 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
that argument only works when you are speaking in terms of personal self..it is PC to ask someone if you may hug or touch them..it is not when you have a store open to the public..no one person should have to ask permission nor shall there be signage of any time of discouragement.

a business open to the public, is just that.

don't like it? the government understands your pain..open yourself a private 'club' signage 'members only'.

BUT! it shall NOT be public, not ever..


You have formed your post (above) in this discussion about property rights in such a way as to offer a characterization of me as if I think racial discrimination is a good thing. I don't think that. I think respect for others property is a good thing though, even when I wouldn't use my private property in the sames ways as those I disagree with.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You are not a racist
You just support and advocate the same racist positions they do
You are not a pedophile
You just took NAMBLA's mission statement as your own
No, whether a person is a racist or not, all people should always own themselves and control their own property and their own body, but not own others or dictate the use of others property or body.

You are a mite bit simple, Prohibitionist in some of the failed attempts at logic you use...
Your "logic" - Hey look that dog has four legs, my god my kitchen table has four legs too, maybe it was the table barking so loud last night!!!??


I really think you are frustrated because you've proposed a law that has prohibitions in it and you can't think of a way out of your lame idea. I almost feel sorry for you, Prohibitionist.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
No, whether a person is a racist or not, all people should always own themselves and control their own property and their own body, but not own others or dictate the use of others property or body.

You are a mite bit simple, Prohibitionist in some of the failed attempts at logic you use...
Your "logic" - Hey look that dog has four legs, my god my kitchen table has four legs too, maybe it was the table barking so loud last night!!!??


I really think you are frustrated because you've proposed a law that has prohibitions in it and you can't think of a way out of your lame idea. I almost feel sorry for you, Prohibitionist.
Legal to grow and possess
Illegal to sell
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You are what is known as a "pedophile enabler".

Stick that on your resume.

Should he put that part before or after he lists his experience as a police lineup dummy and that he has a penchant for proposing prohibitionist laws?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Doesn't bother me with the lable.
Everyone knows you really are a racist and pedophile



*label

Well that's interesting. You've made a claim that I'm something based on zero evidence and your flawed comprehension, which in your case could be genetic or due to a psychosis you suffer from due to your feelings of inadequacy etc.

Then...

You've proposed a real live prohibition in a law, (which is self evident) and laughably you claim you're not a Prohibitionist, despite your proposing a law with a main component BEING prohibition.

I'm afraid I can't help you. I apologize for thumping you so hard too, I had made you out for an asinine prick, when it may not be your fault. Again, my apologies and wishes for your eventual recovery.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
*label

Well that's interesting. You've made a claim that I'm something based on zero evidence and your flawed comprehension, which in your case could be genetic or due to a psychosis you suffer from due to your feelings of inadequacy etc.

Then...

You've proposed a real live prohibition in a law, (which is self evident) and laughably you claim you're not a Prohibitionist, despite your proposing a law with a main component BEING prohibition.

I'm afraid I can't help you. I apologize for thumping you so hard too, I had made you out for an asinine prick, when it may not be your fault. Again, my apologies and wishes for your eventual recovery.
Why do you believe a child can consent to sex with an adult if you are not a pedophile?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Why do you believe a child can consent to sex with an adult if you are not a pedophile?
False dichotomous question.

I believe a person capable of consenting to an action can consent to an action. If there is a magic age for all people that ability to consent happens at, please tell me which age it is.

I believe a person incapable of consenting to an action cannot consent. Forced consent is not actual consent either, despite any "tacit consent" arguments fools care to make, but I am digressing.

If a person is capable of consenting to something then if I prevent their behavior, I've become a prohibitionist. I don't think I need to explain to you what a Prohibitionist is, do I?

I am not comfortable with some of the things that some people willingly consent to, but I'm not like you and don't think I need to PROHIBIT people from interacting in ways they voluntarily consented to which are none of my business, Prohibitionist.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
they texted me that the other girl when told i would be there, asked for my hours:shock:..um, sewwwwwww:roll:

:lol:
Meaning you're shit out of luck? Bernie with a Gatling gun ain't gonna happen. He couldn't even keep two loudmouthed fat girls from taking away his microphone
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You've made a claim that I'm something based on zero evidence.
evidence #1: you refuse to state that it should be illegal for adults to have sex with small children, even as young as 8 years old.

evidence #2: you advocated for people to hang signs on their doors uninviting people based on their skin color.

conclusion: you are a racist pedophile.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
False dichotomous question.

I believe a person capable of consenting to an action can consent to an action. If there is a magic age for all people that ability to consent happens at, please tell me which age it is.

I believe a person incapable of consenting to an action cannot consent. Forced consent is not actual consent either, despite any "tacit consent" arguments fools care to make, but I am digressing.

If a person is capable of consenting to something then if I prevent their behavior, I've become a prohibitionist. I don't think I need to explain to you what a Prohibitionist is, do I?

I am not comfortable with some of the things that some people willingly consent to, but I'm not like you and don't think I need to PROHIBIT people from interacting in ways they voluntarily consented to which are none of my business, Prohibitionist.
WOW
EXACT ALMOST TO THE WORD MISSION STATEMENT OF NAMBLA
ARE YOU A FOUNDING MEMBER?
 
Top