Inappropriate Avs

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
unforgiven1420 said:
doing that really wouldn't make much difference when you leave the page up and your 4 year old niece walks by right? If you have a goal to accomplish with all this you should stick to comming up with a valid solution.
Click to expand...
I'm not saying I plan to do it, and if I did I would obviously NOT leave my lap top open where she could see it anymore.

The point is, if I had an av that was just as bad, it would be removed. THAT'S unfair.

skunkdog said:
go for it!!!
Click to expand...
I'll see what they say first. If they deem yours appropriate, I will take it as the go ahead :wink:
 
smartsoverambition

smartsoverambition

Well-Known Member
No please

u can take my plants

u can take my weed

u can take my money

but god please don't take my doughboy avatar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
 
GrowTech

GrowTech

stays relevant.
heh... out of curiousity... how much more will this thread accomplish than reporting the users post, and attaching the text "inappropriate avatar" in the input box?
 
GreenphoeniX

GreenphoeniX

Well-Known Member
Personally, I think there's nothing inappropriate about a naked body. And being a man, I happen to find the curves of a woman's body one of the most beautiful things this world has to offer.

I agree that some of the avatars I've seen around could be considered inappropriate by some, but if you think those are inappropriate, then you'd hate to see my house. Sculptures of naked women (by themselves, couples making love, lesbian couples), paintings and drawings of naked people on the walls (even one wall sculptures of the lower body/behind in a g string) and a picture of a gorgeous woman being eatin out by a good looking dude (can't see more than breasts).

Many of you probably consider those to be inappropriate, but what you lack to see is the beauty in them. Sex and sexuality is natural, who gets to chose when natural becomes 'against the rules'?

Not taking sides, I'm just saying. That's my view on things. And I like classy women so those avs of skanky/slutty looking woman just seem foul and dirty to me.
 
bluewizard

bluewizard

Well-Known Member
censorship is negative and pointless.. ..in this age of information children are exposed to all the evils of the world eventually anyways, it's an important part of growing up. why mess with the natural way of things?


if something doesn't tickle my fancy, i ignore it. i wish i could make fat chicks stop wearing tight clothes, but sometimes you just have to look the other way.

this is a weed growing forum, not bible camp
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
GrowTech said:
heh... out of curiousity... how much more will this thread accomplish than reporting the users post, and attaching the text "inappropriate avatar" in the input box?
Click to expand...
I believe my first post already answered that question. So rather than re-explain I'll just repost it for you :blsmoke:

Wikidbchofthewst said:
I'm starting this thread so I can report avs I think are inappropriate. I want to post them rather than just report them for a few reasons.

1) I'm already going through the trouble of FINDING these, I don't think I should have to go through the added trouble of finding a post by them and then reporting it.

2) Some of them I'm not even sure of, and if they ARE ok, I'd like to know WHY. Is it ok as long as it's got a bud over it? Is it ok as long as it's a cartoon?

3) According to a lot of the people in my other thread, there really aren't that many naked chick avs. FALSE (lol, sorry, had a Dwight Schrute moment). But seriously, there ARE a lot of inappropriate avs, and I'd like to be able to prove it.

Of course I'm hoping the avs get removed, but the number of links will stand as a count of exactly how MANY there are.
Click to expand...
GreenphoeniX said:
Personally, I think there's nothing inappropriate about a naked body. And being a man, I happen to find the curves of a woman's body one of the most beautiful things this world has to offer.

I agree that some of the avatars I've seen around could be considered inappropriate by some, but if you think those are inappropriate, then you'd hate to see my house. Sculptures of naked women (by themselves, couples making love, lesbian couples), paintings and drawings of naked people on the walls (even one wall sculptures of the lower body/behind in a g string) and a picture of a gorgeous woman being eatin out by a good looking dude (can't see more than breasts).

Many of you probably consider those to be inappropriate, but what you lack to see is the beauty in them. Sex and sexuality is natural, who gets to chose when natural becomes 'against the rules'?

Not taking sides, I'm just saying. That's my view on things. And I like classy women so those avs of skanky/slutty looking woman just seem foul and dirty to me.
Click to expand...
Honestly, I really only have a problem with the out right pornographic avs. But I do have a problem with it if I can't have the male equivalent as MY av. Because it's not fair.
 
yelodrvr

yelodrvr

Well-Known Member
it was odd to me that your last thread on this was closed. pissed me off really. it ran through my head that you should not have been censored then I saw you had it going again. cool for her I would not let them censor me either.

then I click on the profiles you posted and there avis are all changed. now I am really having a mind F(censored)K right now. did they change them on their own? is her post working? or did the moderators do it? have they been censored now? ooo my head going to F(censored)ING explode.

I don't get. with all due respect. say what you need to say. present your case. which you did. very well.

I don't really have a problem with the avis, but after reading your post I could understand and would personally have removed the avis if I had one. beside you fools if we get more chicks in here we have better chance of seeing some girl next store T(cesnsored)TS. JOKING!! ITS A JOKE MAN!!! (mam)

but really where the H(censored)LL are we. we are on a site for growing W(censored)D its the net. there is P(censored)RN everywhere. you cant even order seeds without a pair of T(censored)TS flopping around.

with that said. if there is a rule posted somewhere, and when we checked that little box agreeing to all this rules we didn't want to read. then admid should do something about it. like i dont know maybe CENSOR them

if not then i say let the T(censered)TS fly. o and the D(censored)KS

let people make their own decision. if you don't like it turn it off.

O shit! now there after me. them mother F(censored)ERS. now i have had it. i am sick of this S(censored)T. i am never F(censored)ING coming back here again. i going to go J(censored)K off to some P(censored)N.

F(censored)K it i am going to bed. the porn will probably be CENSORED
 
yelodrvr

yelodrvr

Well-Known Member
bluewizard said:
censorship is negative and pointless.. ..in this age of information children are exposed to all the evils of the world eventually anyways, it's an important part of growing up. why mess with the natural way of things?


if something doesn't tickle my fancy, i ignore it. i wish i could make fat chicks stop wearing tight clothes, but sometimes you just have to look the other way.

this is a weed growing forum, not bible camp
Click to expand...
:hump: right on man.
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
Well they took MY av down. Why should they get to keep their av when mine was taken down? Where the fuck is the fairness in that?
 
"SICC"

"SICC"

Well-Known Member
I see what your saying, but to call out people like that was a lil too much, but thats just me bongsmilie
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
They chose the av didn't they? It's not like I'm exposing anything they didn't already put out there for everyone to see every time they post ANYWAYS
 
yelodrvr

yelodrvr

Well-Known Member
Wikidbchofthewst said:
Well they took MY av down. Why should they get to keep their av when mine was taken down? Where the fuck is the fairness in that?
Click to expand...
in the words of the great Artie Lang WHANNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!.

come on!! is it that important. its a avis. apparently there has to be something in the rules.

but who really goes around to weed site protesting. dont get me wrong. i feel ya on this issue. but consider the place. its like those fools who go to a bar and complain about the smoking. i bet i just called you a fool? didnt i? i am sorry.
i just dont get it. what kind of world would it be if the net was all wholesome and shit.
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
Excuse me, but I have put up with this ever since I became a member, and never bitched about it.

I had a penis in my av for less than 24 hours, and guys were bitching and crying and calling for me to be banned.

Sorry if I'm a bit pissed by such an obvious double standard, but I am.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top