Inappropriate Avs

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
I'm starting this thread so I can report avs I think are inappropriate. I want to post them rather than just report them for a few reasons.

1) I'm already going through the trouble of FINDING these, I don't think I should have to go through the added trouble of finding a post by them and then reporting it.

2) Some of them I'm not even sure of, and if they ARE ok, I'd like to know WHY. Is it ok as long as it's got a bud over it? Is it ok as long as it's a cartoon?

3) According to a lot of the people in my other thread, there really aren't that many naked chick avs. FALSE (lol, sorry, had a Dwight Schrute moment). But seriously, there ARE a lot of inappropriate avs, and I'd like to be able to prove it.

Of course I'm hoping the avs get removed, but the number of links will stand as a count of exactly how MANY there are.


aintgottabhwd's Marijuana Growing Profile
b549420's Marijuana Growing Profile
B.ill.y.Budz's Marijuana Growing Profile
beta0701's Marijuana Growing Profile
baddawg's Marijuana Growing Profile
blakkmask's Marijuana Growing Profile
Blaze all day's Marijuana Growing Profile
 
panhead

panhead

Well-Known Member
I too dislike the xxx avatars but damm this just keeps going on,why on earth is this issue so important to you,sure the xxx avatars are childish at best but why is this such an issue ?
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
panhead said:
I too dislike the xxx avatars but damm this just keeps going on,why on earth is this issue so important to you,sure the xxx avatars are childish at best but why is this such an issue ?
Click to expand...
It's not that big of a deal when the porn av is a chick, but look how big a deal it became when it was a dick :roll:
 
panhead

panhead

Well-Known Member
Wikidbchofthewst said:
It's not that big of a deal when the porn av is a chick, but look how big a deal it became when it was a dick :roll:
Click to expand...
To me it's bad mojo either way,ive seen enough dicks & titties where im not impressed or disgusted,i too prefer avatars with some amount of class to them but i think were all wishing for something thats never going to happen,in the last year or so its easy to spot the influx of alot of juvenile members,to them its cool,i think were going to loose the common decency battle here.

Children who refuse to listen cant be taught.
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
panhead said:
To me it's bad mojo either way,ive seen enough dicks & titties where im not impressed or disgusted,i too prefer avatars with some amount of class to them but i think were all wishing for something thats never going to happen,in the last year or so its easy to spot the influx of alot of juvenile members,to them its cool,i think were going to loose the common decency battle here.

Children who refuse to listen cant be taught.
Click to expand...
I understand that we can't stop people from being childish and having porno avs. But we could report them. But we don't.

It irks me how obvious the double standard is. Guys are willing to let naked chick avs go, but when I had my av people call for me to be BANNED?

I know this is a mostly male community, but I didn't know the female members were held in such little regard.
 
U

unforgiven1420

Well-Known Member
Wikidbchofthewst said:
I understand that we can't stop people from being childish and having porno avs. But we could report them. But we don't.

It irks me how obvious the double standard is. Guys are willing to let naked chick avs go, but when I had my av people call for me to be BANNED?

I know this is a mostly male community, but I didn't know the female members were held in such little regard.
Click to expand...
Any "man" who wanted you banned because of that avitar was obviously not too secure in his own "manhood". I mean if they're that intimidated by a picture of a dick what does that really tell you about them. You're right that it is a double standard and its not fair to the women who use the site just as often as us guys. I still say adding an option to block individual avitars if you find them offensive is the simplest solution for everyone. It's not high technology and wouldn't be that difficult to do. It would allow for freedom of expression so people could put up whatever they deem appropriate and still allow those offended by a certain avitar to not have to look at it every time they log in.
 
ripz

ripz

New Member
yeah get rid of em my mrs hates em i can feel her eyes givin me evils every time theres one on the screen . put your buds on there much rather see that
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
skunkdog said:
picture
Click to expand...

And I want to know if YOUR av is allowable, than can I have a naked guy in my av, and just put a bud leaf over the head of his dick?

unforgiven1420 said:
Any "man" who wanted you banned because of that avitar was obviously not too secure in his own "manhood". I mean if they're that intimidated by a picture of a dick what does that really tell you about them. You're right that it is a double standard and its not fair to the women who use the site just as often as us guys. I still say adding an option to block individual avitars if you find them offensive is the simplest solution for everyone. It's not high technology and wouldn't be that difficult to do. It would allow for freedom of expression so people could put up whatever they deem appropriate and still allow those offended by a certain avitar to not have to look at it every time they log in.
Click to expand...
That really would make it so I personally would have no complaint.

But that leaves the issue of how it makes our site look to outsiders.

ripz said:
yeah get rid of em my mrs hates em i can feel her eyes givin me evils every time theres one on the screen . put your buds on there much rather see that
Click to expand...
No kidding, I'm on this site fairly often, and I don't exactly hide it from anyone who's around. I'll walk away from my lap top with the site up. My niece is four, she can't read, but she can see some girls tits in the av that's on the post above the one I'm reading.
 
U

unforgiven1420

Well-Known Member
Wikidbchofthewst said:
Zerotilt's Marijuana Growing Profile
skunkdog's Marijuana Growing Profile

Both of these avs clearly show a chicks breasts, they just don't show her nipples. Does that make them ok? So would I be able to show a dick as long as I didn't show the head? Or would I be able to show balls as long as I didn't show the dick? Because obviously a man topless does not compare.
Click to expand...
doing that really wouldn't make much difference when you leave the page up and your 4 year old niece walks by right? If you have a goal to accomplish with all this you should stick to comming up with a valid solution.
 
Wikidbchofthewst

Wikidbchofthewst

Well-Known Member
ripz said:
hey some men have got huge boobs lets not be sexist
Click to expand...
But it's socially acceptable for men to be topless. Whether they have manboobage or not, a man's chest is not considered pornographic.

When a movie is censored, what do they block? Tits, pussy, penis. That's it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top