I think im 2 weeks out

D

Destroyer of chairs

Well-Known Member
Kaotic said:
They love to say flushing does nothing, but when it comes to any viable proof at all, they provide none, how can you believe someone solely on what they said, instantly believe it with no proof? Tell me that
Click to expand...
I guess it would be foolish. So what is ur proof it works?
 
Kaotic

Kaotic

Well-Known Member
Destroyer of chairs said:
I guess it would be foolish. So what is ur proof it works?
Click to expand...
Because plants don’t need to be fed all the way to the end of harvest, food you add in the soil , even liquid drenches stay in soil for a week or so, why do you think they say to water in between feedings for soil. Let me explain it to you, because I don’t want to come back and explain it again with more posts it’s a waste of my time so here it goes, nutrients stay in the soil, water breaks it down over time, so.. therefore who would feed their “soil” til the end of harvest... your not supposed to, your supposed to flush it towards the end of harvest, so the food in the soil is depleted and the roots can’t uptake it, and the plant provides itself with the nutrition it holds in the older leaves and branches. Got it?
 
Kaotic

Kaotic

Well-Known Member
Destroyer of chairs said:
I guess it would be foolish. So what is ur proof it works?
Click to expand...
And you don’t have to believe, I can careless if you don’t believe me really, my advice like I said before and I will say again, don’t believe anyone if you have doubts, do your own research, trust me bro everything I’m not sure about and don’t know, I do my research and learn.
 
Dougnsalem

Dougnsalem

Well-Known Member
Flatrate said:
The ignore option works wonders.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's real tempting. REAL tempting. Lol. The problem is, we wont know when bad information to new growers, needs to be corrected. I could see some major, future crop damage happening. It wouldn't be mine, but still; I give a shit.

Edit: Oh, wait...... Nevermind..... I'm a troll.....
 
Last edited:
Kaotic

Kaotic

Well-Known Member
Dougnsalem said:
Yeah, that's real tempting. REAL tempting. Lol. The problem is, we wont know when bad information to new growers, needs to be corrected. I could see some major, future crop damage in the future happening.....
Click to expand...
Ya coming from your valuable information, keep trolling, it’s what your good at lol.
 
Kaotic

Kaotic

Well-Known Member
Dougnsalem said:
Yeah, that's real tempting. REAL tempting. Lol. The problem is, we wont know when bad information to new growers, needs to be corrected. I could see some major, future crop damage in the future happening.....
Click to expand...
You still... have provided no proof btw, of all your non sense you said lol
 
Kaotic

Kaotic

Well-Known Member
None, whatsoever, go to my posts and count all the proof I have provided, I might not be 100% right , but I know for a fact that my statements make more sense then your no proof no source havin asssss lol
 
D

Destroyer of chairs

Well-Known Member
Kaotic said:
Because plants don’t need to be fed all the way to the end of harvest, food you add in the soil , even liquid drenches stay in soil for a week or so, why do you think they say to water in between feedings for soil. Let me explain it to you, because I don’t want to come back and explain it again with more posts it’s a waste of my time so here it goes, nutrients stay in the soil, water breaks it down over time, so.. therefore who would feed their “soil” til the end of harvest... your not supposed to, your supposed to flush it towards the end of harvest, so the food in the soil is depleted and the roots can’t uptake it, and the plant provides itself with the nutrition it holds in the older leaves and branches. Got it?
Click to expand...
So it's for saving money?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top