I believe the Earth is growing because it absorbs solar radiation, and E=MC^2

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
I believe the Earth is literally growing in mass and size because E=MC^2, or if you use a little algebra, M=E/C^2... In English, Mass is equal to Energy divided by the speed of light squared (C^2). So the more energy you have, the more mass you will have because mass is just a different form of energy and conversely, energy is a different form of mass.

So as we all know, sunlight hits the Earth every second of the years. This energy is being converted to mass, I believe, because of plants and whatnot. So the plants are the catalyst in converting the solar radiation to mass. This is just a theory of Mine, I'm not sure if its proven or not but it makes a lot of sense to Me.

This could potentially be why the equator is slightly larger then the north and south poles, because there are more plants near the equator and it absorbs more solar radiation.

The rate at which the earth is growing is the rate at which the plants are absorbing solar radiation, with the equation M=E/C^2. So the more plants and the more solar radiation, the more the Earth will thus grow in proportion. As a side note, the plants also need CO2 and nutrients and water also, as most growers know, but this is a given.

This is just another theory of Mine, I'm not saying its fact or anything but it sure does make a lot of sense to Me. I'm not saying the Earth is growing a lot, but a little bit each day, and over time it might be considered a lot of growing. Maybe I just discovered that the Earth is in fact literally growing in mass and size, but I didn't just discover this, I discovered this a few years ago.

Its My belief, and just a pure belief, that the Earth is growing.

Can anyone refute My belief in this? Why do you think its true or not true? Am I missing anything here?

~PEACE~
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Insolation heats the planet.
Thermal radiation dissipates this. Energy budget and thus mass budget are balanced, net = zero.
The energy's mass is not being converted to matter but simply reradiated.
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
You are missing something, a fifth grade science education. That is not a theory, just an ignorant idea you pulled from your ass. Seriously, George, if you spent time reading science books instead of posting here, you could easily learn basic science facts. Another one-starred thread...
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I was going to say the exact same thing TD said. You spend a lot of time thinking about this stuff, why don't you actually read about the real theories and problems that people have come up with, there are literally hundreds of different books I could recommend for you to read that would only make you smarter and make anything you thought of hold that much more weight behind it.

To me, you seem like a really curious kid with no knowledge of a library. Dude, the knowledge is there, it's so far beyond what you are thinking now, what I am thinking now, it's insane! I urge you to look into reading about this stuff, Isaac Newton, Einstein, start with the big players, through that you will pick up other names of other scientists to look into, it'll stretch way past physics, most likely into chemistry and biology, and once you understand the connection between each of the different sciences, you will be even more curious than you are now, it's awesome!


Stop posting here with things like this, instead, spend that time READING about these theories, it'll get you waaaaay farther than any idiot posting here could ever hope to achieve.
 

GreenSummit

Active Member
agree with the others, philosphy is fun and all, but its much better with a good foundation. and uhhhhhh yeah the earth is growing, TONS and TONS of space debris falls here every single day. sure we shoot some back up there, but i bet more falls down overall.
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
I was going to say the exact same thing TD said. You spend a lot of time thinking about this stuff, why don't you actually read about the real theories and problems that people have come up with, there are literally hundreds of different books I could recommend for you to read that would only make you smarter and make anything you thought of hold that much more weight behind it.

To me, you seem like a really curious kid with no knowledge of a library. Dude, the knowledge is there, it's so far beyond what you are thinking now, what I am thinking now, it's insane! I urge you to look into reading about this stuff, Isaac Newton, Einstein, start with the big players, through that you will pick up other names of other scientists to look into, it'll stretch way past physics, most likely into chemistry and biology, and once you understand the connection between each of the different sciences, you will be even more curious than you are now, it's awesome!


Stop posting here with things like this, instead, spend that time READING about these theories, it'll get you waaaaay farther than any idiot posting here could ever hope to achieve.
He wouldn't even have to read much, as there are a LOT of great PBS shows like NOVA that can explain much in very little time. I suggest starting with these:

1. Becoming Human (3 part series on evolution by natural selection) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qc3QIk__aJw

2. Fabric of the Cosmos (4 part series on spacetime) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUtVw7NMYoY

3. Quantum Leap (1 hour program on quantum mechanics) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGhQmNZhlqw

4. NOVA's Making Stuff (many programs on today's technological advances, you'll esp. like the invisibility stuff. Here's a link to making stuff smarter) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALA_4o3Wj_I

I can give you more once you finish with these. It may be a good idea to keep a notebook to jot down highlights and things that interest you, George. These series are fast paced, and have cool music and CGI to keep your interest. What I listed is the equivalent of hundreds of hours of reading (though you'll miss some details from actually reading books). As Pad said, your ideas will be much more worthwhile with actual knowledge behind them. Enjoy!
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
pretty sure the equator is larger than the poles because the poles are axises....plants take solar energy and turn it into mass.....funny, my grows require more than light....water for example and fert.
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
Insolation heats the planet.
Thermal radiation dissipates this. Energy budget and thus mass budget are balanced, net = zero.
The energy's mass is not being converted to matter but simply reradiated.
You are missing something, a fifth grade science education. That is not a theory, just an ignorant idea you pulled from your ass. Seriously, George, if you spent time reading science books instead of posting here, you could easily learn basic science facts. Another one-starred thread...
I was going to say the exact same thing TD said. You spend a lot of time thinking about this stuff, why don't you actually read about the real theories and problems that people have come up with, there are literally hundreds of different books I could recommend for you to read that would only make you smarter and make anything you thought of hold that much more weight behind it.

To me, you seem like a really curious kid with no knowledge of a library. Dude, the knowledge is there, it's so far beyond what you are thinking now, what I am thinking now, it's insane! I urge you to look into reading about this stuff, Isaac Newton, Einstein, start with the big players, through that you will pick up other names of other scientists to look into, it'll stretch way past physics, most likely into chemistry and biology, and once you understand the connection between each of the different sciences, you will be even more curious than you are now, it's awesome!


Stop posting here with things like this, instead, spend that time READING about these theories, it'll get you waaaaay farther than any idiot posting here could ever hope to achieve.
agree with the others, philosphy is fun and all, but its much better with a good foundation. and uhhhhhh yeah the earth is growing, TONS and TONS of space debris falls here every single day. sure we shoot some back up there, but i bet more falls down overall.
He wouldn't even have to read much, as there are a LOT of great PBS shows like NOVA that can explain much in very little time. I suggest starting with these:

1. Becoming Human (3 part series on evolution by natural selection) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qc3QIk__aJw

2. Fabric of the Cosmos (4 part series on spacetime) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUtVw7NMYoY

3. Quantum Leap (1 hour program on quantum mechanics) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGhQmNZhlqw

4. NOVA's Making Stuff (many programs on today's technological advances, you'll esp. like the invisibility stuff. Here's a link to making stuff smarter) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALA_4o3Wj_I

I can give you more once you finish with these. It may be a good idea to keep a notebook to jot down highlights and things that interest you, George. These series are fast paced, and have cool music and CGI to keep your interest. What I listed is the equivalent of hundreds of hours of reading (though you'll miss some details from actually reading books). As Pad said, your ideas will be much more worthwhile with actual knowledge behind them. Enjoy!
pretty sure the equator is larger than the poles because the poles are axises....plants take solar energy and turn it into mass.....funny, my grows require more than light....water for example and fert.









Most of you guys are more knowledgeable about science then little old Me. I'm a science aficionado but I don't study it much.

But My counterpoint to you all is this;

Why are the dinosaur bones buried deep beneath many layers of soil or rock?

Why are are the fossil fuels buried deep beneath the earth? Where did all this dirt and rock come from to go on top of these fossil fuels?

Why are there many layers of soil and rock from different times in earths history? Why are there so many layers?

I believe this is all the evidence you need to see that the earth is indeed growing. Is this another one of My logical fallacies?

I just did a quick youtube search and this is what I have come up with. Are these also logical fallacies?

Neal Adams' Conspiracy ~ The Earth is Growing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmVTEFX0RwQ

A general search for "the earth is growing".

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=the+earth+is+growing

Can anyone refute these videos?

These videos are proof that the earth is indeed growing, but My theory is that the earth is growing because M=E/C^2 and the plants are the catalyst to induce this growth. This is My novel theory, I'm not saying its right but I'm not saying its wrong either.

In Einsteins equation- E=MC^2, it shows the dichotomy that there are only two possibilities, its either energy or mass. There is no other variable in Einsteins equation. We know its a fact that Mass can be converted to Energy, i.e. nuclear bombs, but why not turn energy into mass like I'm postulating? People tend to forget that M=E/C^2 too. Granted, it will take a shit load of energy to create a small amount of mass, but regardless, it seems possible to Me.

Tyler, I'm very curious to watch your videos/links but I only have an hour a day (or so) to go on the internet each day. I'm at a club house right now. My mother stopped paying for the internet at our house so I'm at a disadvantage compared to you guys that can go online all day long.

So now, who can answer My questions now? Is My logic still flawed or are you guys overlooking something?

Do all of you have your foot in your mouth? or maybe I do?

~PEACE~
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
Most of you guys are more knowledgeable about science then little old Me. I'm a science aficionado but I don't study it much.
If you are an aficionado of science, why don't you study it? How can you call yourself a fan if you know so little about it?

But My counterpoint to you all is this;

Why are the dinosaur bones buried deep beneath many layers of soil or rock?

Why are are the fossil fuels buried deep beneath the earth? Where did all this dirt and rock come from to go on top of these fossil fuels?

Why are there many layers of soil and rock from different times in earths history? Why are there so many layers?

I believe this is all the evidence you need to see that the earth is indeed growing. Is this another one of My logical fallacies?
Cannibineer was nice enough to answer your question. Dude, how do you think land is created? Most of it is made from magma that is spewed from deep inside the planet. That mass was already here, it simply went from the interior of the planet to the exterior. Also, as plant and animal life perish, that creates more sediment layers, and that mass was also created from what was already here...

I just did a quick youtube search and this is what I have come up with. Are these also logical fallacies?

Neal Adams' Conspiracy ~ The Earth is Growing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmVTEFX0RwQ

A general search for "the earth is growing".

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=the+earth+is+growing

Can anyone refute these videos?
Aren't these from a comic book dude? You love science, but you use a comic book artist's asinine ideas as your source of knowledge? There were ancient super continents such as Gondwana and Pangaea that split and drifted into today's land masses, what is so hard to understand?

These videos are proof that the earth is indeed growing, but My theory is that the earth is growing because M=E/C^2 and the plants are the catalyst to induce this growth. This is My novel theory, I'm not saying its right but I'm not saying its wrong either.

In Einsteins equation- E=MC^2, it shows the dichotomy that there are only two possibilities, its either energy or mass. There is no other variable in Einsteins equation. We know its a fact that Mass can be converted to Energy, i.e. nuclear bombs, but why not turn energy into mass like I'm postulating? People tend to forget that M=E/C^2 too. Granted, it will take a shit load of energy to create a small amount of mass, but regardless, it seems possible to Me.
If I were you, I'd leave Einstein's ideas for later. You have enough Newtonian physics to learn first. Walk before you run, lest you constantly stumble and keep making an ass of yourself...

Tyler, I'm very curious to watch your videos/links but I only have an hour a day (or so) to go on the internet each day. I'm at a club house right now. My mother stopped paying for the internet at our house so I'm at a disadvantage compared to you guys that can go online all day long.
I suggested them because you don't like to read, and because you can learn a lot in very little time...

So now, who can answer My questions now? Is My logic still flawed or are you guys overlooking something?
Your logic is flawed, learn basic geology...

Do all of you have your foot in your mouth? or maybe I do?
Your feet are constantly in your mouth and your head is in your ass, get an elementary school education, I beg you. This is getting hard to watch...

P.S. Please do some actual research from established, peer reviewed sources before posting. It is better for everyone if we can discuss actual science facts. It's not cool to ask others to correct your errors and to do your homework for you. You need to develop a sense of shame...
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Are you assuming fossil fuels are only from animals? I think 90 something % of fossil fuel is actually plant matter.....and if I find a video that says that is it really proof?
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
nope hope for OP i am out
There's no hope for Me, I am stubborn. But honestly, if I'm wrong, I will relent and admit defeat; but I still think I'm right at this point. There will always be critics to every NEW THEORY! I can be a critic too.

I want what the OP is smoking !!!!!
I'm not smoking anything at this point besides cigarettes.

But if you want to see the things I came up with while I smoked weed then I will give you a couple of links.

This is a pretty long thread below and it starts out slow but picks up speed.

https://www.rollitup.org/spirituality-sexuality-philosophy/600992-i-found-like-dozen-videos.html

The next link is much more curtailed, if you don't want to read a lot then just read from page 19-21. (EDIT- there are 6 videos of Me on page 20, you can see Me and hear My crazy prophecies if you really want to.)

https://www.rollitup.org/spirituality-sexuality-philosophy/671505-what-would-make-future-christ-19.html

The above link is My beliefs in a nutshell.

Enjoy.

If you are an aficionado of science, why don't you study it? How can you call yourself a fan if you know so little about it?
I love science and I intend to study more of it in the future. I'm a fan of science because I went to school for (electronic) engineering and I learned a lot about it, but I also forgot a lot too. Science is the gateway to more advanced technology and I appreciate technology. Technology is the ability to advance. I'm a big fan of advancements.

Cannibineer was nice enough to answer your question. Dude, how do you think land is created? Most of it is made from magma that is spewed from deep inside the planet. That mass was already here, it simply went from the interior of the planet to the exterior. Also, as plant and animal life perish, that creates more sediment layers, and that mass was also created from what was already here...
I agree that magma/lava can produce new lands, like islands and whatnot, but there are only so many volcanoes around the earth.

I also agree that animals and mostly plants create new sedimentary layers over the existing soil, but the difference in our beliefs is that I believe its extra- from NEW material.

Aren't these from a comic book dude? You love science, but you use a comic book artist's asinine ideas as your source of knowledge? There were ancient super continents such as Gondwana and Pangaea that split and drifted into today's land masses, what is so hard to understand?
I gave you links to many videos about why the earth is growing, not just one. Although, I only watched one of them because of My limited time of the club house computer.

You should watch more of the "conspiracy videos" that try to explain that the earth is growing. I'm sure most of them are not from a comic book, dude.

If I were you, I'd leave Einstein's ideas for later. You have enough Newtonian physics to learn first. Walk before you run, lest you constantly stumble and keep making an ass of yourself...
I the biggest ass on Rollitup, you should know that Tyler; you're one of My biggest critics. According to you, most of My theories and prophecies are ludicrous and impossible. You have read a lot of what I have written and you think most of what I have posted is simply drivel and asinine.

I suggested them because you don't like to read, and because you can learn a lot in very little time...
I would love to watch your videos but I only have about an hour on the internet each day for now. I'm going to get a smart phone for Christmas though, at least I plan on it.

And you're right, I would rather watch science videos then read. I have ADD and its hard to pay attention for Me because of it.

Your logic is flawed, learn basic geology...
Maybe My logic is flawed, but its still a theory that I came up with. I don't see you coming up with any new theories. I very well could be wrong but it was worth a try and I do have a chance of being right, at this point. Unless you can demonstrably prove that I'm wrong.

Your feet are constantly in your mouth and your head is in your ass, get an elementary school education, I beg you. This is getting hard to watch...
Your so sweet to Me, My sweetheart.

P.S. Please do some actual research from established, peer reviewed sources before posting. It is better for everyone if we can discuss actual science facts. It's not cool to ask others to correct your errors and to do your homework for you. You need to develop a sense of shame...
I was hoping to get some peer review from you guys, you're all scientists on here, right? At least most of you pose as scientists.

You don't have to do My homework for Me, you could simply read what I wrote and make your deductions from that. Its not called a debate for nothing.

play nice now children..
Tyler loves to debase everything I say. He thinks I'm the biggest ignoramus on here. And I admit to not being the most intelligent person, I'm about average in intellect.

Are you assuming fossil fuels are only from animals? I think 90 something % of fossil fuel is actually plant matter.....and if I find a video that says that is it really proof?
I never said fossil fuels are only from animals.

What really is proof? Some people don't except proof anyways. Of course there is proof of many things, but people sometimes just believe what they want.

~PEACE~
 

Indagrow

Well-Known Member
what makes you think the equator has the most amount of plants on it? its actually a harsh area where plants don't exactly thrive.. wouldn't you think there are more plants in the northern hemisphere where there is more land? I understand what you are saying with Einsteins equations but you need to remember the earth as a whole is much more complex and as CN pointed out in a balanced state as of now. You wanna talk about theories!? well my theory is our solar system is getting smaller! i mean we already lost Pluto whats next?
 

New Age United

Well-Known Member
Yes what you are saying has merit, photons however are near massless and are not capable of converting into any other form, unlike neutrons, protons and electrons, which are interchangeable and will always change according to their mass. Neutrinos as you may know are capable of passing right through the earth because of their extremely small size and density. Keep in mind that the earth may also be giving off mass as it expends energy through space, which is a fabric and is ultimately the governor of all space-time.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
I think maybe you are denying gravity a little in this theory also honestly.......reason I bring up fossil fuels being mostly plants is because the next new deposits buried deep under those new layers of rock soil and other crusty things is all around you right now and came from what is already sloshing about on the surface and from what was spewed from within......which is also what was once on the surface......gravity.....iron has a lot of it.....so the matter in plants comes from earth and the catalyst is the suns radiation.....you make it like the radiation creates matter.....my point is photosynthesis doesn't create new matter......and that the equator is a larger diameter than the poles because of acceleration......ever been to the drag strip and seen the top fuel dragsters light up the big back tires during a burnout??? think of the tires as the equator and the axle as the poles.....the tires dont weigh more when they're spun up, hope that helps.

[youtube]ghs8qoYPSjY[/youtube]
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
I agree that magma/lava can produce new lands, like islands and whatnot, but there are only so many volcanoes around the earth.
Really? How many volcanoes? Just ONE super-volcano (there are six, like the one under Yellowstone Park) has the potential to erupt spilling millions of tons of debris across the ENTIRE planet. It will block out the sun for decades, killing much of the plant life, hence animal life, on Earth. There are about 600 active volcanoes on Earth, and an unknown amount of submarine volcanoes. There have been millions of erupting volcanoes since the birth of our planet, it shouldn't be so hard to believe they are the source of our land masses...

I also agree that animals and mostly plants create new sedimentary layers over the existing soil, but the difference in our beliefs is that I believe its extra- from NEW material.
Your beliefs are erroneous: look at the specious conspiracy theorist data, then look at the overwhelming expert, peer reviewed data. It's not even close to being in question. You choose beliefs based on feeling, not evidence, so of course you will be wrong most of the time. Learn to evaluate credible data instead of what sounds cool to you...


I gave you links to many videos about why the earth is growing, not just one. Although, I only watched one of them because of My limited time of the club house computer.

You should watch more of the "conspiracy videos" that try to explain that the earth is growing. I'm sure most of them are not from a comic book, dude.
I see two links you posted. The fact that you post links that you, yourself have not even bothered to view tells us all we need to know about your integrity and credibility, which seems to be zero. That's what I mean about asking others to do your homework for you, "Here guys! Watch this shit and attempt to debunk it, for I cannot be bothered..." How lazy can one be?

I the biggest ass on Rollitup, you should know that Tyler; you're one of My biggest critics. According to you, most of My theories and prophecies are ludicrous and impossible. You have read a lot of what I have written and you think most of what I have posted is simply drivel and asinine.
Yes, and I'm sure most share my assessment of you...


I would love to watch your videos but I only have about an hour on the internet each day for now. I'm going to get a smart phone for Christmas though, at least I plan on it.

And you're right, I would rather watch science videos then read. I have ADD and its hard to pay attention for Me because of it.

Maybe My logic is flawed, but its still a theory that I came up with. I don't see you coming up with any new theories.
It is NOT a theory, it is an idea you had based on ignorance. Please familiarize yourself with what a scientific theory is. It is the highest form of knowledge we possess, made up of many laws and facts, that has great predictive power. Your idea is not based on facts or physical laws, and has zero predictive power, so it is NOT a theory. What is the big deal of coming up with new theories or ideas? Just because something is novel doesn't make it valuable or credible. I am not intelligent or educated enough to come up with new theories, do you know how arduous it is to do that? No, of course you don't. You don't even know what goes into the process. Leave it to the adults, George...

I very well could be wrong but it was worth a try and I do have a chance of being right, at this point. Unless you can demonstrably prove that I'm wrong.
Any credible geology source proves you wrong, you just don't know that because the only 'research' you've done is of wacky YT conspiracy videos...



Your so sweet to Me, My sweetheart.
You make it so easy, darling...

I was hoping to get some peer review from you guys, you're all scientists on here, right? At least most of you pose as scientists.

You don't have to do My homework for Me, you could simply read what I wrote and make your deductions from that. Its not called a debate for nothing.
You have your peer review, everyone here is telling you the same thing. This is not a debate, it is a child yelling out for attention by spewing false crap, and the adults attempting to educate you (and you shitting all over that) telling you to settle down.


Tyler loves to debase everything I say. He thinks I'm the biggest ignoramus on here. And I admit to not being the most intelligent person, I'm about average in intellect.
It seems that the rest of us are of average intellect, you are WELL below average...


What really is proof? Some people don't except proof anyways. Of course there is proof of many things, but people sometimes just believe what they want.
Yes, YOU simply believe what you like. The proof is there, you will simply not review or acknowledge it...
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
What of the sun's mass? Do you think the mass of the sun grows or shrinks as a result of the nuclear fusion reaction that provides the light which seems to be the source for your theory? That's the theory right, that sunlight = NEW mass?
 
Top