How the right is actually killing free speech

UncleBuck · May 27, 2015

TBoneJack said:
I'm not upset at all Buck. In fact, if you'd like to put our differences behind us and become friends, consider me willing to give it a try...

you're pretty upset there, murdoch.

UncleBuck · May 27, 2015

TBoneJack said:
No Pada, I don't think so.

Just because something happens occasionally in nature doesn't make it intended as natural by the age old natural force of desire to procreate.

I don't hate gays. But I don't want to see their lifestyle advertised as just fine and dandy for our kids. It's much better for a person to be hetero than homo. And I think that's undeniable.

tell me more about how nature has intents.

TBoneJack · May 27, 2015

UncleBuck said:
you're pretty upset there, murdoch.

But I'm calm now. And I'm inviting you to become my friend.

UncleBuck · May 27, 2015

TBoneJack said:
Infertile hetero couples are infertile for various reasons, none of them being that they want to deposit their sperm in a place where it can't create another of the species.

Which may be an intended dead end for gays: that they don't pass on their genes to the gene pool.

Seems logical.

are you too stupid to realize that it is straight couples who are responsible for the existence of gay people?

Padawanbater2 · May 27, 2015

TBoneJack said:
Yes they do.

You're just willing to promote perversion in an attempt to strike back at the right you so hate.

What evidence do you have that suggests that a kid needs a female mother and a male father to be successful?

TBoneJack said:
And please realize, I don't hate gays. I think gays should have civil rights protection, and be allowed to marry.

But their unnatural lifestyle should not be promoted as "equal" to heterosexual (i.e. natural) lifestyle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separate_but_equal

Pick up a fuckin' history book. You can shove your new Jim Crow laws for homosexuals right up your ass, buddy

TBoneJack · May 27, 2015

UncleBuck said:
tell me more about how nature has intents.

Nature has intents and "desired" outcomes.

Case in point: you eat a bad Wendy's hamburger and get sick. You decide Wendy's is responsible, so you go in the bathroom and take a huge dirty runny shit all over the floor. And then you have the fucking nerve to brag about it on RIU.

Nature thus intends for you to eat shit.

UncleBuck · May 27, 2015

TBoneJack said:
There's one example for every time a person becomes heterosexual. Their lives can proceed as nature intended. They can procreate with the opposite sex, so their children can have both a (real) mom (female) and (real) dad (male).

And their children won't need to read some fucked up book like "Heather Has Two Mommies" to understand the fucked up living situation of their parents.

Kids need a mom (female) and dad (male). And none of the fucked up 21st century babble speak will change that.

TBoneJack said:
But their unnatural lifestyle should not be promoted as "equal" to heterosexual (i.e. natural) lifestyle.

TBoneJack said:
But I'm calm now. And I'm inviting you to become my friend.

no thanks, i don't befriend retarded bigots.

UncleBuck · May 27, 2015

TBoneJack said:
Yeah, and for Down's Syndrome babies as well, you extra dumb fucking shithead.

are you comparing gays to retarded people, murdoch?

still want to tell me you're not a bigot?

Padawanbater2 · May 27, 2015

Oh, OK, so no evidence then? Gotcha

Homosexuals lives are difficult because people like you make it difficult

TBoneJack · May 27, 2015

UncleBuck said:
are you comparing gays to retarded people, murdoch?

still want to tell me you're not a bigot?

I'm saying that just because a certain mutation exists, doesn't mean that it's natural. You big tall ugly dumb Wendy's bathroom floor shitter.

UncleBuck · May 27, 2015

TBoneJack said:
the rush to GLORIFY homosexuality is wrong.

the bill in tennessee that kills free speech doesn't ban the glorification of homosexuality, murdoch, it bans the mention of homosexuality altogether.

UncleBuck · May 27, 2015

TBoneJack said:
I'm saying that just because a certain mutation exists, doesn't mean that it's natural. You big tall ugly dumb Wendy's bathroom floor shitter.

is it natural to have red hair and green eyes, murdoch?

TBoneJack · May 27, 2015

UncleBuck said:
the bill in tennessee that kills free speech doesn't ban the glorification of homosexuality, murdoch, it bans the mention of homosexuality altogether...

Well although I wouldn't personally go that far, I wouldn't want to impose my beliefs on others...

TBoneJack · May 27, 2015

UncleBuck said:
is it natural to have red hair and green eyes, murdoch?

Hell no, and I wouldn't eat lunch with anyone like that...

Padawanbater2 · May 27, 2015

TBoneJack said:
Well although I wouldn't personally go that far, I wouldn't want to impose my beliefs on others...

You are imposing your beliefs on others when you label something unnatural that occurs in nature

UncleBuck · May 27, 2015

TBoneJack said:
Well although I wouldn't personally go that far, I wouldn't want to impose my beliefs on others...

so you're OK with limiting free speech as long as it fits your brand of bigotry.

TBoneJack · May 27, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
Oh, OK, so no evidence then? Gotcha

Homosexuals lives are difficult because people like you make it difficult

No Pada, it's not just me that makes it difficult. It's human nature.

And I know you hate that. As does my liberal friend at work. But both of you are wrong. Human nature welcomes heterosexuality, and rejects homosexuality.

Don't think so? Just ask the "male homo defenders" you know if they would mind if you introduced them as homosexual at the next party you throw...

Homos should be accepted as equal human beings, but not their lifestyles. And that's just so fucking obvious that a fucking blonde daughter of @UncleBuck and Rosie O'Donnel could understand it.

TBoneJack · May 27, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
You are imposing your beliefs on others when you label something unnatural that occurs in nature

No sir Pada, I'm just telling the truth.

You're ever so close to breaking out in a surprising but natural goose step...I just wanted to inform you as a person who wishes the best on everyone...

Padawanbater2 · May 27, 2015

TBoneJack said:
No Pada, it's not just me that makes it difficult. It's human nature.

And I know you hate that. As does my liberal friend at work. But both of you are wrong. Human nature welcomes heterosexuality, and rejects homosexuality.

Don't think so? Just ask the "male homo defenders" you know if they would mind if you introduced them as homosexual at the next party you throw..

I don't give a shit if every other human on Earth hated homosexuals as much as you do, "human nature" or being "unnatural" or "they can't have kids" still isn't justification to treat them any different than a heterosexual person.

The fact you judge people based on who they like is what's abhorrent. Why don't you just stay the fuck out of their lives like you profess everyone else does? How bout that?

TBoneJack said:
Homos should be accepted as equal human beings, but not their lifestyles.

"Black people should be accepted as equal human beings, but not their lifestyles."

Shut the fuck up Jim Crow

TBoneJack · May 27, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
I don't give a shit if every other human on Earth hated homosexuals as much as you do, "human nature" or being "unnatural" or "they can't have kids" still isn't justification to treat them any different than a heterosexual person.

The fact you judge people based on who they like is what's abhorrent. Why don't you just stay the fuck out of their lives like you profess everyone else does? How bout that?

"Black people should be accepted as equal human beings, but not their lifestyles."

Shut the fuck up Jim Crow

I don't hate ANYONE. It's you fucking extreme leftist wierdo freak head liberals that hate.

And it makes me laugh.

Blacks are natural. Gays are not. Ask 97% of blacks. They would agree, because 97% of blacks profess to be Christian.

How the right is actually killing free speech

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member