BuddyGetHigh2
Member
I can understand the perspective of this piece on employers drafting marijuana policies into their employee handbooks. It makes sense to me in the same way the 2-beer-max on lunchbreaks makes sense. However, I feel like the article's tone is a bit heavy-handed. To be perfectly honest, I've showed up to work drunk and I've showed up stoned - no one really noticed the difference other than me being in a better mood. But I don't think weed affected my work performance anymore than the alcohol. While I believe employers should cover themselves, it makes sense to me that 81% aren't really that worried. There's nothing to worry about.