Dow average plunges 513, worst drop since 2008

mame

Well-Known Member
The sky is falling!

The stock market has predicted nine of the last five recessions, after all. :roll:

Jobs report was better than expected, but expect a downward revision... I bet the final numbers end up 70-80k jobs and 9.2% unemployment rather than ~120k jobs and 9.1%. Either way, the employment to population ratio is moving downwards and we're on the verge of Deflation.
 

Charlie Ventura

Active Member
It matters very little to me, just like last time, I got my money out of stocks in the nick of time. If it crashes all the way back down to 7,000 I'll hop back in and ride it back up again. I just find it humorous that the liberal partisan hacks on this forum will bury their heads in the sand, all the while attacking and insulting anyone who doesn't hide from reality with them.

Our little state of NC is F L O O D E D with Democrats from the North East, ask any of them why...too expensive...too much taxes. The scariest thing about it is they still vote in the same manner that led to all that stupidity in the first place.
And this is exactly what Progressives do. They foist their economic BS on society and when everything fails, they just shrug their shoulders and say: "Oh well, that didn't work." Then they leave the smoldering ashes behind and look for greener pastures to destroy. Isn't this what parasites do ... move from one empty blood sucked host only to find another?
 

jeff f

New Member
The sky is falling!

The stock market has predicted nine of the last five recessions, after all. :roll:

Jobs report was better than expected, but expect a downward revision... I bet the final numbers end up 70-80k jobs and 9.2% unemployment rather than ~120k jobs and 9.1%. Either way, the employment to population ratio is moving downwards and we're on the verge of Deflation.
and your suggestion is to put more money in ? just wondering
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
it ain't just ugly here, the ugliness is worldwide right now.

we could have made a debt ceiling deal with twice the cuts and avoided a credit rating downgrade if the tea party fuckheads had accepted the modest revenue increases (corporate jets? c'mon, you fucking fucks).

but noooooooo.....

i personally do not give a shit. people will not stop wanting cannabis anytime soon. a lot of other people are taking it in the pooper, though.
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
The sky is falling!

The stock market has predicted nine of the last five recessions, after all. :roll:

Jobs report was better than expected, but expect a downward revision... I bet the final numbers end up 70-80k jobs and 9.2% unemployment rather than ~120k jobs and 9.1%. Either way, the employment to population ratio is moving downwards and we're on the verge of Deflation.
Hmmm..... (10char)

As is usually the case, there is far more than meets the eye to the Labor Department's report that the economy added 117,000 jobs last month and the unemployment rate fell to 9.1%. Let's start with the reality that fewer people actually were working in July than in June.
According to a Bureau of Labor Statistics breakdown, there were 139,296,000 people working in July, compared to 139,334,000 the month before, or a drop of 38,000.
But the job creation number was positive and the unemployment rate went down, right? So how does that work?
It's a product of something the government calls "discouraged workers," or those who were unemployed but not out looking for work during the reporting period.
This is where the numbers showed a really big spike—up from 982,000 to 1.119 million, a difference of 137,000 or a 14 percent increase. These folks are generally not included in the government's various job measures.
So the drop in the unemployment rate is fairly illusory—stick all those people back in the workforce and you wipe out the job creation and the drop in unemployment.
For once, some of the government's other tools of economic voodoo didn't help the count.
The vaunted birth-death model, a byzantine approximation of business creation and failure, actually subtracted 18,000 from the total job creation after a five-month run where it added a total of 741,000 positions to the count.
And the so-called "real" unemployment rate, which adds in discouraged workers and others not counted as part of the headline unemployment rate, actually pulled back one notch to 16.1 percent.
But there's plenty of bad news to go around otherwise.
The average duration of unemployment rose for the third straight month and is now at a record 40.4 weeks—about 10 months and now double where it was when President Obama took office in January 2009. The total number unemployed for more than half a year now stands at 6.18 million, 130 percent higher than when the president's term began.
Among the nuggets of good news—the jobless rate for blacks slipped to 15.9 percent and for Latinos to 11.3 percent, both at four-month lows.
But how good or bad the unemployment picture really may not come into view until next month, because of distortions from seasonal adjustments.
Including teachers and others who experience seasonal unemployment, total joblessness actually rose 1.23 million.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2011-08-05-cnbc-jobs-report_n.htm
 

sen.c

Active Member
You think that drop was bad wait until Monday and watch it sink after being down graded.
 

sen.c

Active Member
Stimulis my ass, that's the dumbest shit brained idea I have ever heard. I own 3 companies and I can tell you the government wouldn't help me out so why should they step in and help a company that is failing, they are failing for a reason. Let the bastards tank, someone with money and the management skills to make it operate correctly will be there to pick it up. Just another band-aid that accomplishes nothing.

The best stimulis is hunger, let those entitlement bastards starve long enough and I bet they come around and those who don't let nature take it's course, what nature doesn't get a hard working citizen with a gun will when they protect the fruits of their labor.
 

mame

Well-Known Member
I didn't say the jobs report was good, I said it was better than expected (and I actually expect a downward revision like always)... I watch the employment to population ratio mostly, which is down. I'll quote myself:
Either way, the employment to population ratio is moving downwards and we're on the verge of Deflation.


And yes, fiscal stimulus (or negative interest rates, defulat by inflation) are the only ways out - we're in a liquidity trap.

 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
It seems today's 635 point drop was a bit worse than Friday. Sen.c predicted exactly what would happen too.
 

Charlie Ventura

Active Member
I didn't say the jobs report was good, I said it was better than expected (and I actually expect a downward revision like always)... I watch the employment to population ratio mostly, which is down. I'll quote myself:
[/B]

And yes, fiscal stimulus (or negative interest rates, defulat by inflation) are the only ways out - we're in a liquidity trap.

Negative interest rates? Would you please explain what you mean by that? Are you saying that with new home mortgages and car loans, the banks will be paying US to take out the loans?
 

mame

Well-Known Member
Negative interest rates? Would you please explain what you mean by that? Are you saying that with new home mortgages and car loans, the banks will be paying US to take out the loans?
If interest rates are already at the zero-lower bound and you pursue further inflationary policies, say the Fed were to announce a 4% core inflation target for two years, it forces the inflation-adjusted interest rates below zero and this is supposed to pull an economy out of the dreaded liquidity trap... But of course there are risks associated with this option that makes fiscal stimulus much more appealing IMO.

On interest rates and how it'd effect the consumer... In this scenario the Fed would be charging banks to hold money on reserve; Beyond that I'm not 100% sure but I'd imagine interest rates would go UP for the average consumer because banks would want to recoupe their losses, but the important thing is that it forces banks to put their money into something rather than nothing (unless they want to hold physical bills to avoid the fees). Since interest rates are very low ATM anyway, that's not really an issue; The whole point is to force banks into investing, and investment creates economic growth and therefore jobs.
 

Charlie Ventura

Active Member
^^^ OK fine. But ... the mortgage rates are almost at all time lows. Programs for first time buyers are excellent. Banks ARE making real estate loans to qualified buyers. There is a real flood of inventory at bargain prices in the resale housing market. Why are those buyers not waiting in line to buy houses?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
They can't get any credit becasue they have no jobs.

Any idea how many soon to be foreclosed homes the banks are letting the previous owners live in for free? Hundreds of thousands. Know why? Because to actually foreclose would be to take bad debt onto your books, further reducing your reserves. Once your reserve ratio cannot be maintained the FDIC borrows a bunch of money to take you over and begin the process of insuring peoples money. The bank ceases to exist after it is liquidated.

They don't want to give anyone credit right now, they are safer earning interest on the reserves they keep with the Fed, which by the way is quite a bit more than they can borrow from the government. So what they do is to borrow from the Fed overnight at .25% interest, buy long term bonds at 4.5% and make the extra 4%+ in profit basically on the backs of the People who ultimately pay the bond yields...the US Taxpayer.
 

Cali chronic

Well-Known Member
^^^ OK fine. But ... the mortgage rates are almost at all time lows. Programs for first time buyers are excellent. Banks ARE making real estate loans to qualified buyers. There is a real flood of inventory at bargain prices in the resale housing market. Why are those buyers not waiting in line to buy houses?
Because we are tired of being taxed on every little thing with no representation. I wont buy another house unless it is cash and has land and no neighbors. (very unlikely in other words) It seems the banks like to throw anyone in a loan including next door and not care if it goes foreclosure or not.
I know they care up to the point of being insured. I am done borrowing money and financing houses. This comes from a guy who bought 5 houses in his lifetime and owned 3 at once. Who barely dumped his last one without getting hammered on credit. Now I am debating to even bother doing a tax filing as I own nothing but a car and have cash and not happy about the money being sent to the F.P.A Future Pirates of Africa in Somalia. These people on the hill are ruining America!
 

mame

Well-Known Member
They don't want to give anyone credit right now, they are safer earning interest on the reserves they keep with the Fed,
Exactly; Negative interest rates would solve this problem.
 

Charlie Ventura

Active Member
Exactly; Negative interest rates would solve this problem.
Fine, but the question was: ^^^ OK fine. But ... the mortgage rates are almost at all time lows. Programs for first time buyers are excellent. Banks ARE making real estate loans to qualified buyers. There is a real flood of inventory at bargain prices in the resale housing market. Why are those buyers not waiting in line to buy houses?
 

mame

Well-Known Member
It's not about housing so much as it is about getting loans to small businesses, etc... The government would NOT try to force liquidity into the housing market in this scenario, the government only forces money out of the Fed's coffers... After that the market can put the money wherever it wants pretty much.
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
We're headed for the second Great Depression. Things are going to be really tough for everyone. Both of my parents lived through the first Depression. The stories they tell are horrifying.
 
Top