ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
Those aren't my words. You're false quoting me.
Instead of assassinating my character yours just committed suicide my misattributing a quote to me.
Donald Trump Named in Lawsuit for Raping Teenage Girl
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
Instead of assassinating my character yours just committed suicide my misattributing a quote to me.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Bill has been speaking and campaigning for Hillary for quite some time now, In case you didn`t know, He is still married to her.
So out the window with your foolish statement. Man you are stupid today.
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
There is a difference between lying and saying something that is inaccurate.
I suppose youre referring to the case made by W. to invade Iraq. We never found much in the way of wmd did we?
But every intelligence agency in the world swore that Iraq had a stockpile and a r&d program for developing more.
It is entirely possible that Saddam took the six months of advanced warning to eliminate his weapons.
More than that, Bush was following the law when he invaded. The UN had made numerous resolutions that Saddam. Also, according to international law, a state loses its sovereignty under several conditions. Supporting terrorism, genocide, and proliferation among them. Saddam was guilty on all three of those charges.
Take 30 minutes and listen to the case Christopher Hitchens made on the invasion. His argument for the invasion is compelling.
Elwood Diggler
Well-Known Member
jesus christ scooter.....go look up the fucking post yourself. you can't really be this fucking stupid
Elwood Diggler
Well-Known Member
wrong again scooter. the cia, the british, the mossad as well as the un inspectors said no wmds. you talk out of both sides of your neck so in your mind you can make a claim of being right. i suspect it's a lack of self worth and confidence that has you projecting like this but it's clear you're a fucking idiot
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
I can't look up what isn't there. I have never mentioned Clinton being tried for a blowjob without leaving out the legal cause of action being lying about said blowjob.
Those are not my words. Liar.
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
On this, you're not arguing with me. You're arguing with perhaps the best and brightest person of our time. Though he may be dead, his wisdom is saved for posterity.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2007/03/so_mr_hitchens_werent_you_wrong_about_iraq.html
FIGHTING WORDS
A WARTIME LEXICON.
MARCH 19 2007 1:53 PM
Should it not have been known by Western intelligence that Iraq had no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction?
The entire record of UNSCOM until that date had shown a determination on the part of the Iraqi dictatorship to build dummy facilities to deceive inspectors, to refuse to allow scientists to be interviewed without coercion, to conceal chemical and biological deposits, and to search the black market for materiel that would breach the sanctions. The defection of Saddam Hussein's sons-in-law, the Kamel brothers, had shown that this policy was even more systematic than had even been suspected. Moreover, Iraq did not account for—has in fact never accounted for—a number of the items that it admitted under pressure to possessing after the Kamel defection. We still do not know what happened to this weaponry. This is partly whyallWestern intelligence agencies, including French and German ones quite uninfluenced by Ahmad Chalabi, believed that Iraq had actual or latent programs for the production of WMD. Would it have been preferable to accept Saddam Hussein's word for it and to allow him the chance to re-equip once more once the sanctions had further decayed?
Last edited:
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
... Continued.
Could Iraq have been believably "inspected" while the Baath Party remained in power?
No. The word inspector is misleading here. The small number of U.N. personnel were not supposed to comb the countryside. They were supposed to monitor the handover of the items on Iraq's list, to check them, and then to supervise their destruction. (If Iraq disposed of the items in any other way—by burying or destroying or neutralizing them, as now seems possible—that would have been an additional grave breach of the resolutions.) To call for serious and unimpeachable inspections was to call, in effect, for a change of regime in Iraq. Thus, we can now say that Iraq is in compliance with the Nonproliferation Treaty.Moreover, the subsequent hasty compliance of Col. Muammar Qaddafi's Libya and the examination of his WMD stockpile (which proved to be much larger and more sophisticated than had been thought) allowed us to trace the origin of much materielto Pakistan and thus belatedly to shut down the A.Q. Khan secret black market
Could Iraq have been believably "inspected" while the Baath Party remained in power?
No. The word inspector is misleading here. The small number of U.N. personnel were not supposed to comb the countryside. They were supposed to monitor the handover of the items on Iraq's list, to check them, and then to supervise their destruction. (If Iraq disposed of the items in any other way—by burying or destroying or neutralizing them, as now seems possible—that would have been an additional grave breach of the resolutions.) To call for serious and unimpeachable inspections was to call, in effect, for a change of regime in Iraq. Thus, we can now say that Iraq is in compliance with the Nonproliferation Treaty.Moreover, the subsequent hasty compliance of Col. Muammar Qaddafi's Libya and the examination of his WMD stockpile (which proved to be much larger and more sophisticated than had been thought) allowed us to trace the origin of much materielto Pakistan and thus belatedly to shut down the A.Q. Khan secret black market
bluntmassa1
Well-Known Member
That would just be fun.
bluntmassa1
Well-Known Member
Hillary Clinton voted for the war in Iraq which makes her no better than Bush whatsoever... How about her role in Libya? What was that justified? You do know ISIS is now in Libya right? Ghadaffi wouldn't have had that shit nor would Saddam.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Come on man. That's some weak thinking there. It makes her a part of the Congress's act to approve so yes her hands are dirty. The White House fabricated lies to justify the vote.
Tell me, what role in Libya did she play?
bluntmassa1
Well-Known Member
Benghazi, the no fly zone which ensured the US armed Islamic extremists could kill Ghaddafi. Now some how.... ISIS is in Libya. Gee I wonder how that happened....
Maybe a bit like Syria we armed moderate Islamic Extremists which turned out to be ISIS. We also armed the Kurds who are not such great people they are communists and want to be gifted a nation.
Every single thing we do in the middle east does nothing but cause more problems.
Rrog
Well-Known Member
This, I agree with
see4
Well-Known Member
Bill Clinton is not running for President of the United States. He already made America great for 8 years. Obama did it for another 8 years. And now it's Bernie or Hillary's turn.
Though I have less faith in Hillary making America more great. But Bernie can. Trump, definitely, with 100% confidence, will not make America greater than it already is.
Focus on the candidates. Don't be a hypocrite.