green_nobody
Well-Known Member
it would be nice if a cigarette would hold only 200, a Marlboro bland holds more than 600 chemical additives to it...
...and who takes 20-40 hits from the bong a day???
ain't me at leased
Does Marijuana Cause Cancer?
- Thread starter PUFF DADDY
- Start date
it would be nice if a cigarette would hold only 200, a Marlboro bland holds more than 600 chemical additives to it...
...and who takes 20-40 hits from the bong a day???
ain't me at leasedpurple bLaZe!!!
Active Member
u told him
skunkushybrid
New Member
If you smoke the cannabis leaf then this can have as much tar in it as a cigarette.
skunkushybrid
New Member
Yeah, stick to the bud and trim the leaf.
leonphelpss11
Well-Known Member
sure u can, ever seen final destination uno, dos, y tres?
lmao, I'm jk but I'm sure in the future once cloning is legalized and the protestors are on their death beds bitching to someone to save their life by cloning them a new heart or whatever that we'll escape death, but then the world will be overpopulated and we'll have to find a new planet or die. Don't pay me any attention, I'm just bored and been watchin too much of the sci fi channel. this was just to lighten peoples moods
To read my 2 cents on the matter, check out the following link: Cannabis & Cancer: On the carcinogenicity of marijuana smoke.
Here's an excerpt (I didn't want to take up too much space):
"To date, no animal study has demonstrated the carcinogenicity of marijuana smoke. Future studies would, ideally, be conducted with animal models that reflect the stages of both initiation and progression observed in human cancer, but no such model currently exists (Khanna et al. 2005). In vivo studies on the neoplastic properties of cannabinoids have typically been conducted with BALB/cJ, B6C3F1, and C57BL/6J murine [mouse] strains, which are not susceptible to chemically-induced SCCL [Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Lungs]. Even the most susceptible strains do not develop SCCL as the result of exposure to tobacco smoke (Wang et al. 2004), the definitive benchmark for human carcinogens....
In evaluating the carcinogenicity of any type of smoke, it might help to remember that it was epidemiology, rather than animal research, that first incriminated tobacco smoke as a carcinogen (Proctor 2004). While there have been lurid case-reports of tobacco-related cancers among young and middle-aged marijuana smokers (Sridhar et al. 1994), a large cohort study found no evidence of precocious tobacco-related cancers among middle-aged marijuana smokers (Sidney et al. 1997).
As tobacco-related cancers develop increasingly with age and exposure, the cohort study did not follow its participants for long enough to ascertain the relationship between marijuana smoking and tobacco-related cancers. Small hospital-based case-control studies have inconsistently found an association (Chacko et al. 2006, Hsairi et al. 1993, Llewellyn et al. 2004a, Llewellyn et al. 2004b, Sasco et al. 2002, Voirin et al. 2006, Zhang et al. 1999), whereas population-based case-control studies -- especially those with a large number of cases and/or randomly selected controls -- tend to suggest, if anything, an inverse association (Ford et al. 2001, Hashibe et al. 2006, Rosenblatt et al. 2004, Zhu et al. 2002).
The question as to whether heavy prolonged marijuana smoking causes tobacco-related cancer has recently been addressed by a large case-control study that included significant numbers of heavy long-term marijuana smokers (Hashibe et al. 2006). Evidence from this study -- the largest case-control study to date -- suggests that even heavy prolonged marijuana smoking does not appreciably increase the risk of tobacco-related cancers. One way or the other, if marijuana smoking affects the risk of cancer, it may do so to an extent revealed only by large-scale epidemiologic consortia, such as those under the auspices of the International Association for Research on Cancer (q.v., The International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium)."
Peace
Here's an excerpt (I didn't want to take up too much space):
"To date, no animal study has demonstrated the carcinogenicity of marijuana smoke. Future studies would, ideally, be conducted with animal models that reflect the stages of both initiation and progression observed in human cancer, but no such model currently exists (Khanna et al. 2005). In vivo studies on the neoplastic properties of cannabinoids have typically been conducted with BALB/cJ, B6C3F1, and C57BL/6J murine [mouse] strains, which are not susceptible to chemically-induced SCCL [Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Lungs]. Even the most susceptible strains do not develop SCCL as the result of exposure to tobacco smoke (Wang et al. 2004), the definitive benchmark for human carcinogens....
In evaluating the carcinogenicity of any type of smoke, it might help to remember that it was epidemiology, rather than animal research, that first incriminated tobacco smoke as a carcinogen (Proctor 2004). While there have been lurid case-reports of tobacco-related cancers among young and middle-aged marijuana smokers (Sridhar et al. 1994), a large cohort study found no evidence of precocious tobacco-related cancers among middle-aged marijuana smokers (Sidney et al. 1997).
As tobacco-related cancers develop increasingly with age and exposure, the cohort study did not follow its participants for long enough to ascertain the relationship between marijuana smoking and tobacco-related cancers. Small hospital-based case-control studies have inconsistently found an association (Chacko et al. 2006, Hsairi et al. 1993, Llewellyn et al. 2004a, Llewellyn et al. 2004b, Sasco et al. 2002, Voirin et al. 2006, Zhang et al. 1999), whereas population-based case-control studies -- especially those with a large number of cases and/or randomly selected controls -- tend to suggest, if anything, an inverse association (Ford et al. 2001, Hashibe et al. 2006, Rosenblatt et al. 2004, Zhu et al. 2002).
The question as to whether heavy prolonged marijuana smoking causes tobacco-related cancer has recently been addressed by a large case-control study that included significant numbers of heavy long-term marijuana smokers (Hashibe et al. 2006). Evidence from this study -- the largest case-control study to date -- suggests that even heavy prolonged marijuana smoking does not appreciably increase the risk of tobacco-related cancers. One way or the other, if marijuana smoking affects the risk of cancer, it may do so to an extent revealed only by large-scale epidemiologic consortia, such as those under the auspices of the International Association for Research on Cancer (q.v., The International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium)."
Peace
HighPhi
Well-Known Member
Coulnt agree more.
I like your perspective shaman
The real question is. Does cancer cause marijuana smoker's
Desired User Name
Well-Known Member
No,man. Marijuana causes peace.
leonphelpss11
Well-Known Member
lmfao................................................................
SuperDaveJr712
Well-Known Member
vaporize.10
skunkushybrid
New Member
He's been banned... it's just for some reason it doesn't appear under their names anymore.
blazinraleigh
Active Member
Does anyone know if the study included people smokng bowls, bongs, vaporizors, joints or blunts??? Just wondering, I know it said "marijuana cigatettes" so I'm assuming joints.... but I wasn't sure...
stoner_kiddie
Well-Known Member
weed is in the bible, god said we are allowed use it as we please....
"I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.
In God we trust." genesis 1:29
"I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.
In God we trust." genesis 1:29
stoner_kiddie
Well-Known Member
by the way, thats one page ONE!!!!!! the beginning
Yes but people shouldn't ask such a retarded question, this is by far the most stupid question I've heard in a long time... You've got to be American, or 10 years old. Marijuana has been made into some type of bad drug through years and years of propaganda. Marijuana is a sacred plant, don't you think its here for a reason?
Cannabis will save us all.
Cannabis will save us all.