Do you know somthing called water?

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
.
.................Water covers 71% of the Earth's surface and the earth is a big magnet is it not? theorists say that water takes on the imprint energy it come into contact with?


And the human brain is a bio reactor that produces the electricity your nervous system uses, but you cant run a computer on it. In theory it sounds like it hey maybe , but in practicality the magnitudes required would not even be close.
 

NnthStTrls

Well-Known Member
The only purpose of having something pass thorough a magnetic field is to induce a current. Non conductive materials would have little to no effect. Water is non conductive. Even when you add ions water its self is still non conductive. The oxygen atom is too electronegative for it to pass along electrons. If you put enough energy into water the water will give up a hydrogen but it still wont pass along electrons. The fact that mixing salts into water can complete a circuit does not mean water is conductive. what is happening is that the salts are free to float along and when they meetup with another one swimming around they can transfer electrons. this keeps happening until it reaches the other end of the pool. Water is a catalyst for this but not the cause. So to say that water can be magnetic just sounds silly because it cant pass a current.

A current can create a magnetic field & A magnetic field can induce a current. Both arguments must be followed ,a material can not do just one.

Water is non conductive????!!!!!?!?!??!!!
 

delvite

Well-Known Member
And the human brain is a bio reactor that produces the electricity your nervous system uses, but you cant run a computer on it. In theory it sounds like it hey maybe , but in practicality the magnitudes required would not even be close.
71% this is without adding what organic organisms have consumed it has been the same since earth was eventually formed, some of that ice has been there since we dont know when. it is said that water take on the molecular imprint of the energy it comes into contact with ( imprint not energy ) its has been found that moods n such have an impact on the energy humans release ( bad vibes for the hippies :) ) now somwhere along the line, water has been into contact with everything? therfore it has the print of every thing it comes into contact with, this has been going on from start of life to now:) is it a book that we dont know how to read :)
 

delvite

Well-Known Member
71% this is without adding what organic organisms have consumed it has been the same since earth was eventually formed, some of that ice has been there since we dont know when. it is said that water take on the molecular imprint of the energy it comes into contact with ( imprint not energy ) its has been found that moods n such have an impact on the energy humans release ( bad vibes for the hippies :) ) now somwhere along the line, water has been into contact with everything? therfore it has the print of every thing it comes into contact with, this has been going on from start of life to now:) is it a book that we dont know how to read :)
...................is this an advanced concept known as "Magneto Hydro Dynamic interaction".....??????????..............fujiwara_prayer.jpg4347553558_71a64d60d1_o.jpg
do not mistake these for snowflakes, these are energy inprinted water memorys < this is what im trying to understand? i think theres a way or putting this into a form or veiw that humans may under stand? does any one else get me here?:wall::wall::wall::wall:
 

delvite

Well-Known Member
.................................any helpful posts or points in the right direction such as studies/sites/info and such are welcome and +repped :) c'mon growers lets think ;)
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
it is said that water take on the molecular imprint of the energy it comes into contact with ( imprint not energy ) its has been found that moods n such have an impact on the energy humans release
You are not saying anything that holds meaning here. Like asking what color is Tuesday, it doesn't make sense.


Energy is a science word that means only one thing, the ability to do work. A measurable work potential. Energy can be used, it can be stored, but it can not be imprinted onto a house, or felt from negative thoughts. If ever you hear the word energy being used, reaplace it with the phrase "ability to do work" and see if it still makes sense. If not, then it's probably a meaningless statement. When someone is trying to explain a scientific concept, and misuses such a basic scientific word as energy, that person probably doesn't know what they are talking about.

Correct use:
These batteries have no energy.
These batteries have no ability to do work.


Incorrect use:
This old house is giving off a lot of negative energy.
This old house is giving off a lot of negative ability to do work.


So lets look at some statements about this water:

it is said that water take on the molecular imprint of the ability to do work it comes into contact with ( imprint not work potential ) its has been found that moods n such have an impact on the ability to do work humans release

do not mistake these for snowflakes, these are measurable work potential inprinted water memorys






Regardless whether this magnetic water works for plants or not, the mechanism proposed is not grounded in reality, or even sensible.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
This is interesting synergy of thought. Your dismissal is quite correct, Mr. H. And yet this illustrative word replacement has me on a new tangent.

I like tangents. Drop the "not", take it out of context entirely, we get this, a very interesting definition of snowflakes. The memories are the various crystallization patterns. Not necessarily a personal revelation but an interesting view of how work gets done on even the tiniest levels. Cheers!

snowflakes, these are measurable work potential imprinted water memory.

 

delvite

Well-Known Member
You are not saying anything that holds meaning here. Like asking what color is Tuesday, it doesn't make sense.


Energy is a science word that means only one thing, the ability to do work. A measurable work potential. Energy can be used, it can be stored, but it can not be imprinted onto a house, or felt from negative thoughts. If ever you hear the word energy being used, reaplace it with the phrase "ability to do work" and see if it still makes sense. If not, then it's probably a meaningless statement. When someone is trying to explain a scientific concept, and misuses such a basic scientific word as energy, that person probably doesn't know what they are talking about.

Correct use:
These batteries have no energy.
These batteries have no ability to do work.


Incorrect use:
This old house is giving off a lot of negative energy.
This old house is giving off a lot of negative ability to do work.


So lets look at some statements about this water:

it is said that water take on the molecular imprint of the ability to do work it comes into contact with ( imprint not work potential ) its has been found that moods n such have an impact on the ability to do work humans release

do not mistake these for snowflakes, these are measurable work potential inprinted water memorys






Regardless whether this magnetic water works for plants or not, the mechanism proposed is not grounded in reality, or even sensible.
....................so stay in your box :) this aint helping ;)
 

delvite

Well-Known Member
..............................................[video=youtube;3RDJEz_Iero]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RDJEz_Iero&amp;feature=fvwrel[/video]
 

delvite

Well-Known Member
This is interesting synergy of thought. Your dismissal is quite correct, Mr. H. And yet this illustrative word replacement has me on a new tangent.

I like tangents. Drop the "not", take it out of context entirely, we get this, a very interesting definition of snowflakes. The memories are the various crystallization patterns. Not necessarily a personal revelation but an interesting view of how work gets done on even the tiniest levels. Cheers!

snowflakes, these are measurable work potential imprinted water memory.

im thinking like this because you cant solve a problem with the wrong answer if you get my ways :) the greatest minds in history admitted their ways were not flawed but il-equiped to undersand yet - so..................we havent come far enough, but im learning ;)
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
"....................so stay in your box
this aint helping
.

I say it is helping. You are in our science forum. We expect science. Human mood is science. Magnetic effect is science.
Crockery is when un-related science is shoved together and "ah ha" is proclaimed. Show some evidence and propose
thoughts in a way that we can relate. Proposing that we just keep quiet is cult not science.
 

delvite

Well-Known Member
"....................so stay in your box
this aint helping
.

I say it is helping. You are in our science forum. We expect science. Human mood is science. Magnetic effect is science.
Crockery is when un-related science is shoved together and "ah ha" is proclaimed. Show some evidence and propose
thoughts in a way that we can relate. Proposing that we just keep quiet is cult not science.
Any living organism relies on an external source of energy&#8212;radiation from the Sun, you are talking chemical energy from consumation where im taking internal energry the kind that is in the centre of the what was/is life now ;) p.s sorry for snapping i do want help understanding this or trying to find a way to understand tis im just tired ;)
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
This is interesting synergy of thought. Your dismissal is quite correct, Mr. H. And yet this illustrative word replacement has me on a new tangent.

I like tangents. Drop the "not", take it out of context entirely, we get this, a very interesting definition of snowflakes. The memories are the various crystallization patterns. Not necessarily a personal revelation but an interesting view of how work gets done on even the tiniest levels. Cheers!

snowflakes, these are measurable work potential imprinted water memory.

To me snowflakes form different geometry based on physics. Crystallization is the release of energy and will follow the path of least resistance. Since no tiny piece of the atmosphere will ever be the same you will always get a different geometry. Not to mention as the grain begins to crystallize it will move along its own path through varying different conditions. Conditions like: ambient temperature, friction, pressure, airflow, density , ect... The simplest example can think of is temperature and airflow. If it is cold the snowflake would have large grains, if its hot it would have small grains. If the air flow is high then there would be more force pushing the conditioning water to the edges giving you long spindly snowflakes. If the pressure is high then there is theoretically more water vapor giving you an overall larger snowflake in size.


 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
Any living organism relies on an external source of energy&#8212;radiation from the Sun, you are talking chemical energy from consumation where im taking internal energry the kind that is in the centre of the what was/is life now ;) p.s sorry for snapping i do want help understanding this or trying to find a way to understand tis im just tired ;)

Energy from the sun is different then chemical energy.:spew::wall:
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
Dr. Emoto, who received his doctorate in alternative medicine from the Open International University for Alternative Medicine in India, which is listed between Hollywood Upstairs Medical College and the Correspondence College of Tampa on the international list of unaccredited diploma mills, achieved his fifteen minutes with an infamous experiment. He took samples of water and exposed them to a variety of words, sounds, and pictures, subjectively categorized as good, bad, ugly, beautiful, etc, etc, and then took pictures of the resulting ice crystals that formed when these samples were cooled sufficiently.


He discovered that the ice crystals exposed to good things were beautiful to look at and the ones exposed to bad things were ugly and deformed. He naturally figured that the words, pictures and sounds pass along information to the water via vibrations and an observer effect he bases on, wait for it, quantum physics (said in a booming and echoing voice). The stupid, it burns, vibrates, and is apparently quite a gossip.


What Emoto actually does in his unblinded experiments is take multiple pictures of the ice crystals and pick out the ones that support his hypothesis. I hope I didn&#8217;t ruin that for anyone. :???:

http://spacecityskeptics.wordpress.com/2008/12/23/more-water-woo-from-masaru-emoto/
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
Wait a minute... I've been saying nice things to my reservoirs all these years for NOTHING? Delvite, we been had!
 

delvite

Well-Known Member
To me snowflakes form different geometry based on physics. Crystallization is the release of energy and will follow the path of least resistance. Since no tiny piece of the atmosphere will ever be the same you will always get a different geometry. Not to mention as the grain begins to crystallize it will move along its own path through varying different conditions. Conditions like: ambient temperature, friction, pressure, airflow, density , ect... The simplest example can think of is temperature and airflow. If it is cold the snowflake would have large grains, if its hot it would have small grains. If the air flow is high then there would be more force pushing the conditioning water to the edges giving you long spindly snowflakes. If the pressure is high then there is theoretically more water vapor giving you an overall larger snowflake in size.


this is the kind of thing im talking about, great post on the right track but these are a puzzle ( like a chinese whisper passed down ) energy grades like: ambient temperature, friction, pressure, airflow, density , ect are added to the imprint on water. this is why there is no way of measuring this certain type of energy it is so unpridictable ( solar flare energy emittion) this is what confused our greatest minds - our science / physics ect is run by mathmatical syncronicity ;) how can i look at an uncertain problem with so many vaviables in so much depth in so many different levels with a basis that is not finished or flawed? <-----im talking about?
 

delvite

Well-Known Member
Dr. Emoto, who received his doctorate in alternative medicine from the Open International University for Alternative Medicine in India, which is listed between Hollywood Upstairs Medical College and the Correspondence College of Tampa on the international list of unaccredited diploma mills, achieved his fifteen minutes with an infamous experiment. He took samples of water and exposed them to a variety of words, sounds, and pictures, subjectively categorized as good, bad, ugly, beautiful, etc, etc, and then took pictures of the resulting ice crystals that formed when these samples were cooled sufficiently.


He discovered that the ice crystals exposed to good things were beautiful to look at and the ones exposed to bad things were ugly and deformed. He naturally figured that the words, pictures and sounds pass along information to the water via vibrations and an observer effect he bases on, wait for it, quantum physics (said in a booming and echoing voice). The stupid, it burns, vibrates, and is apparently quite a gossip.


What Emoto actually does in his unblinded experiments is take multiple pictures of the ice crystals and pick out the ones that support his hypothesis. I hope I didn&#8217;t ruin that for anyone. :???:

http://spacecityskeptics.wordpress.com/2008/12/23/more-water-woo-from-masaru-emoto/
does he pick or sort what he knows to be an inprint of the certain protonal discharge (mood)? this is what i think is the universal language :) its just in a form we dont understand :)
 
Top