Cure For Cancer

RavenMochi

Well-Known Member
so when you say oil, you mean hash oil?! as in when I soak bud in everclear for several days and then evaporate off the alc hash oil?! I had heard indica's are better for this (against cancer) do you know if thats true, or will both sativa and indica strains produce the desired result? We are starting a garden here, not just mj, but food and herbs to be used as medicine, so I know after this crop I'll be adding hash oil to the medicine cabinet just in case, hell cancer killed off a large number of my family, and took my wifes mother, so I'd just as soon be keeping some on hand just in case.... :)
 

lowryder666

Active Member
so when you say oil, you mean hash oil?! as in when I soak bud in everclear for several days and then evaporate off the alc hash oil?! I had heard indica's are better for this (against cancer) do you know if thats true, or will both sativa and indica strains produce the desired result? We are starting a garden here, not just mj, but food and herbs to be used as medicine, so I know after this crop I'll be adding hash oil to the medicine cabinet just in case, hell cancer killed off a large number of my family, and took my wifes mother, so I'd just as soon be keeping some on hand just in case.... :)
7 days!! With naphtha you shouldn't stir for more than 3 minutes or you start extracting the nasties (chlorophyll etc). Is everclear any different? What about the 99% Isopropyl Alcohol?
 

RavenMochi

Well-Known Member
never stirred it that long, I just put the material in a jar, cover it with a little over with the everclear, seal up and put in fridge for about 3 days, filter out the plant matter, and put in a dish to evaporate the alc off...I don't do more than that because having done both, I didn't notice a significant difference in potency. I also only do one time, some people soak the matter 3 time, but all 2nd and 3rd do imo is dilute the overall product. it'll make more, but I stick with the first run, the most potent... I wont use Iso, but there are people that swear by it, we had a whole thread on it somewhere in the great sea of threads...
 

whiteflour

Well-Known Member
vaporize to prevent lung cancer . . . . edibles to potentially cure most forms of internal cancers . . .


smoking is a mixture of cannabinoids that kill most cancer, and carcinogens . . . if you smoke, you're only allowing cannabis resistent cancer to survive in your lungs . . . . theoretically you're killing all cancer not resistent to cannabis, but if you ever get lung cancer, theoreteically cannabis wont be able to cure it do to constant exposure to cannabinoids + carcinogens . . . so yeah I'd stop smoking entirely if I were you and actually worried about that.
Vaporize.... to avoid lung cancer. Are you hearing yourself right? If they can make you "vaporize" it, they can make you take the "freebase" form. You'll better wake up before government pulls the wool over your eyes. They are simply looking for a new cash cow. Right on the backs of a new breed of "smoker".

Why don't we smarten up and learn we are responsible for our own health and safety? I never needed a scientist to tell me what was bad.
 

poplars

Well-Known Member
Vaporize.... to avoid lung cancer. Are you hearing yourself right? If they can make you "vaporize" it, they can make you take the "freebase" form. You'll better wake up before government pulls the wool over your eyes. They are simply looking for a new cash cow. Right on the backs of a new breed of "smoker".

Why don't we smarten up and learn we are responsible for our own health and safety? I never needed a scientist to tell me what was bad.
eh, what are you trying to say here?

that I shouldn't vaporize because it's one different from smoking? did the government invent this so I could break away from cannabis 'smokers' ? wtf are you trying to say dude seriously.
 

GreatwhiteNorth

Global Moderator
Staff member
Vaporize.... to avoid lung cancer. Are you hearing yourself right? If they can make you "vaporize" it, they can make you take the "freebase" form. You'll better wake up before government pulls the wool over your eyes. They are simply looking for a new cash cow. Right on the backs of a new breed of "smoker".

Why don't we smarten up and learn we are responsible for our own health and safety? I never needed a scientist to tell me what was bad.
Huhh?? Is vaporizing the new Govt conspiracy?
 

kronic1989

Well-Known Member
Lol I didnt get the point of his post either....Whos MAKING them vaporize? whos gonna MAKE them take it in "freebase" form?

LOL Ive read the post over 10 times now. I still dont see were he was sitting in his head when he wrote that... What side of the fence are you on? it seems you've dug yourself underneath the fence and got your head caught.
 

kronic1989

Well-Known Member
In the media such as news broadcasting, billboards, newspapers, EVERYWHERE...... this isn't a joke.. if everyone knew about the cure there isn't anything the corporations can do about it. unless they wanna arrest the percentage of the population who grow because they themselves have cancer or know someone who does. In short spread the word... a quickly as you can.

okay guys, i have some more info... you don't need to necessarily make the oil, you can make edibles with the hemp such as cookies or brownies and they still contain nearly as much thc as the oil itself. But ofcourse the oil is always better since it's concentrated.
Hey fiveoh, you dont happen to be from ontario do you? that cop car looks like a toronto cop car.
 

poplars

Well-Known Member
Lol I didnt get the point of his post either....Whos MAKING them vaporize? whos gonna MAKE them take it in "freebase" form?

LOL Ive read the post over 10 times now. I still dont see were he was sitting in his head when he wrote that... What side of the fence are you on? it seems you've dug yourself underneath the fence and got your head caught.
lmfao couldn't have said it better myself +rep
 

whiteflour

Well-Known Member
The E-Cig has been around for ages, was "patented" in the 30s. The point is we have "dangerous product" that now creates and cures cancer. Sounds like the perfect marketing plan to me. Taxes?
 

poplars

Well-Known Member
sorry but its been scientifically proven to be better. many people prefer it. it would not have been adopted if people didn't truly find it better, so calm down on the conspiracy bro.
 

kronic1989

Well-Known Member
Okay, this thread started out as "cure for cancer" talking about weed curing cancer, in the oil form, and other forms.

What are you trying to say?

I still dont get what point ur pushing..

Whats is this "dangerous product" that creates and cures cancer?
 

whiteflour

Well-Known Member
My point is Big Tobacco (a bunch of little guys, and a few big guys - like us) were always looking out for the consumers. They always led innovations to make things "safer". The same innovations we rely on today. Big Govt and Big Pharma have taken that over. They've killed our economy with it, and now we're about to give them ABSOLUTE control of cannabis.

Nobody knows what they believe anymore about the hazards of "smoking". We've only been "smoking" tobacco, easy to point figers then huh? So they hushed them up for 20 years now they're about to cram a bunch of shit down out throat with the other plant we all loved. Expect Fire Safe Joints in the not so distant future, since we all love to smoke Carpet Glue.

I'm seriously about ready to move off grid. Vote No on 19.
 

poplars

Well-Known Member
lol sorry bro but you're just trippin. I don't really feel the need to dissect every point of your statement because it's all your own heresay bs. or heresay bs you got from someone else. as long as it's still legal to breed, there will be no control taken over cannabis.

and if you don't think smoke is bad for your lungs you lack common sense. if you ever tried vaporizing for a month you would notice a dramatic difference on how much bud you need, and the high. but hey, keep spreading your bs. it is a free country after all.
 

highflyby

Active Member
Vaporize.... to avoid lung cancer. Are you hearing yourself right? If they can make you "vaporize" it, they can make you take the "freebase" form. You'll better wake up before government pulls the wool over your eyes. They are simply looking for a new cash cow. Right on the backs of a new breed of "smoker".

Why don't we smarten up and learn we are responsible for our own health and safety? I never needed a scientist to tell me what was bad.
Thanks....need help putting up your propaganda?
 

whiteflour

Well-Known Member
lol sorry bro but you're just trippin. I don't really feel the need to dissect every point of your statement because it's all your own heresay bs. or heresay bs you got from someone else. as long as it's still legal to breed, there will be no control taken over cannabis.

and if you don't think smoke is bad for your lungs you lack common sense. if you ever tried vaporizing for a month you would notice a dramatic difference on how much bud you need, and the high. but hey, keep spreading your bs. it is a free country after all.
You are totally taking this the wrong way. Smoking is bad, I agree. It also causes cancer. We've known that since 1700s when people smoked Opium, Tobacco, Hemp, Everything.

We only need scientists to tell us there is a Cure. Well gee, that's a miracle drug if you can both Smoke it, and freebase it to cure cancer. Guess who has a monopoly on it? Not Us. I'm being a realist. There have been rumors that this had benefits to cancer for ages.... It's probably true. But is it really any surprise we only find out now? Right after the FDA finally got a grip on Tobacco, and CA is ready to Double Tax MJ? Repeat of 1990?

My old man works in tobacco, he's a mechanic, he knows the blueprints, and the factory. For years he has said if any "chemcials" were going into cigarettes, they were coming from the Paper or Menthol, both Gov approved. No big surprise then when we have FSC laws getting forced on ALL tobacco products, yet Menthol cigarettes weren't banned under "flavors"? Don't you think if the Government made them go All Natural, like they used to be, the cancer rates might just drop?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rebecca-brooks/fire-safe-cigarette-laws_b_519867.html
 
Top