COVID-19 WILL SEIZE YOUR RIGHTS & DESTROY OUR ECONOMY

The Hippy

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I sense that you may have wet your pants. Would you like a brief recess so that you may put on clean undergarments?
Click to expand...
Isn't there a shopping cart handle or doorknob you could go lick somewhere? Just kidding...don't really do that.
 
redi jedi

redi jedi

Well-Known Member
Sorry Hippy, huge difference between a right and a privilege. Privileges can be revoked but rights cannot...supposedly anyways. Your right to freedom hasnt been revoked officially, but try leave the country, lol.

If your scared of getting covid than you should stay home, but for people like me that are not concerned, why should I not carry on as normal?
 
jimihendrix1

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
Because you a are potential carrier, and can infect those who do not want to be infected.

A Potential Typhoid Mary cant just walk around freely. Everyone has to sacrifice for the better good of their fellow Americans. To not do so is selfish, and short sighted.

If you have it and dont know it, youre basically giving older people with preexisting conditions a death sentence. Also most older people have multiple preexisting conditions. Its selfish, and all about Me Me Me. But what about ME???

So what about the senior citizens?

I guess like LT Governor from Texas said.

Theres more important things than living.

Id like to know what they are??? Your rights end, when you violate mine.

I dont want my older relatives in the hospital dying alone, and I cant see them for the last time.
 
redi jedi

redi jedi

Well-Known Member
jimihendrix1 said:
Because you a are potential carrier, and can infect those who do not want to be infected.

A Potential Typhoid Mary cant just walk around freely. Everyone has to sacrifice for the better good of their fellow Americans. To not do so is selfish, and short sighted.

If you have it and dont know it, youre basically giving older people with preexisting conditions a death sentence. Also most older people have multiple preexisting conditions. Its selfish, and all about Me Me Me. But what about ME???

So what about the senior citizens?

I guess like LT Governor from Texas said.

Theres more important things than living.

Id like to know what they are??? Your rights end, when you violate mine.

I dont want my older relatives in the hospital dying alone, and I cant see them for the last time.
Click to expand...
Like I said, if you dont want to be infected than quarantine yourself. If Im not worried about getting infected, let me and all the other people not concerned carry on as normal. Putting everyone in quarantine is a financial death sentence IMO...
 
kotobide

kotobide

Well-Known Member
The fact of the matter is this is affecting the old and infirm. Over 80% of them are over 65 and we should do right by them and quarantine them and those at risk and allow the rest of the free word to get back to normalcy. New studies of antibody testing is showing we have millions who have already been sick without even knowing it driving down the death toll to less than 1% we no longer need to lock down over 350 million people at this point.
 
jimihendrix1

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
People have to go to the store to get food.

Also some who have had the virus, have no antibodies. Its also not know as of now if antibodies are a guarantee you cant get the virus again.

Not enough is known.

Its affecting everone. Just some more than others. Many young people are overweight, making them have a preexisting condition.
 
TheRealDman

TheRealDman

Well-Known Member
jimihendrix1 said:
Because you a are potential carrier, and can infect those who do not want to be infected.

A Potential Typhoid Mary cant just walk around freely. Everyone has to sacrifice for the better good of their fellow Americans. To not do so is selfish, and short sighted.

If you have it and dont know it, youre basically giving older people with preexisting conditions a death sentence. Also most older people have multiple preexisting conditions. Its selfish, and all about Me Me Me. But what about ME???

So what about the senior citizens?

I guess like LT Governor from Texas said.

Theres more important things than living.

Id like to know what they are??? Your rights end, when you violate mine.

I dont want my older relatives in the hospital dying alone, and I cant see them for the last time.
Click to expand...
Canada has done 380,000 tests with only 6% being positive, and less than 1% of those needing hospitalization, and even less needing ICU. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of a few. In this case...the few being .001% (or less) of the population.
 
jimihendrix1

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
Agree the current USA Administration is fucking dangerous, and a laughing stock

Anyone want to have a Bleach Injecting Party?

Drink some Lysol??

Stick a UVA/B bulb up your ass?? Sounds like a plan.

Fauci Warns: Antibody Tests Aren’t Fully Validated Yet

Will expanded testing capacity be needed to get Americans back into the public square — and if so, what kind of testing? Dr. Anthony Fauci told ABC’s George Stephanopolous on Good Morning America that viral-identification testing has enough capacity to handle a Phase 1 start, although Fauci would like to see more of it and more efficient access by states to capacity now. However, the talk about antibody testing and by extension “immunity certificates” based on it is way too early.

SEE ALSO: FDA: Beware all those COVID-19 antibody tests we just unleashed

In the first place, Fauci says, we aren’t even sure that exposure to COVID-19 confers immunity yet. If not, antibody testing might end up being superfluous even if it proved reliable — and we’re not there yet on that point either (via CNN):


The problem is that these are tests that need to be validated and calibrated, and many of the tests out there don’t do that. So even though you hear about companies flooding the market with these antibody tests, a lot of them are not validated,” Fauci told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos.
“There’s an assumption – a reasonable assumption – that when you have an antibody that you are protected against reinfection, but that has not been proven for this particular virus. It’s true for other viruses,” said Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
“But we don’t know how long that protection, if it exists, lasts. Is it one month? Three months? Six months? A year? So the assumption that with the tests that are out there, if you have an antibody positivity, you’re good to go – unless that test has been validated and you can show there’s a correlation between the antibody and protection, it is an assumption to say that this is something that we can work with,” Fauci said. “We still have a way to go with them.”
Click to expand...
Fauci intends this as a warning specific to the antibody tests that are set to flood the marketplace now. Until they are validated and calibrated, there’s not a lot of value in them, unlike the viral-identification tests that show acute infection of COVID-19. The New York Times also offers a big warning to those hoping that antibody testing is the shortcut out of our economic thicket. They’re not accurate, they’re not being used properly, and there aren’t enough of them to matter in terms of making go/no-go decisions.
 
jimihendrix1

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
Not elderly people that live in rural america, and dont even have a car. Some places where I live in East Kentucky have to drive 30+ minutes to even get to a store. Some have to drive an hour to get to a hospital.

Aint no online stores in my area dude. NONE. As in ZERO.
 
redi jedi

redi jedi

Well-Known Member
jimihendrix1 said:
Not elderly people that live in rural america, and dont even have a car. Some places where I live in East Kentucky have to drive 30+ minutes to even get to a store. Some have to drive an hour to get to a hospital.

Aint no online stores in my area dude. NONE. As in ZERO.
Click to expand...
Well if they dont have a car, they have someone doing their shopping already so whats the problem?

Who lives in a rural setting without transportation in the first place?
 
Last edited:
TheRealDman

TheRealDman

Well-Known Member
jimihendrix1 said:
Not elderly people that live in rural america, and dont even have a car. Some places where I live in East Kentucky have to drive 30+ minutes to even get to a store. Some have to drive an hour to get to a hospital.

Aint no online stores in my area dude. NONE. As in ZERO.
Click to expand...
Maybe Mitch should be lobbying the Governor of Kentucky or the Feds to be helping more. Oh wait...the GOP is scared of Trump!
 
jimihendrix1

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
They hire someone to drive them, or have someone in the family, if they have any family take them. Same for the post office.

Anything the Governor wants to do, has to go through the Republican Controlled House, and Senate in Ky. Ds do not have control of those 2 bodies.

Beshear cant do anything without going through Moscow Mitch.

MFr has over 380 bills sitting on his desk he wont let come up for a vote, or review.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top