Charlotte..

S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
Or yall could try reading the whole article I linked you. Plain clothes cops unmarked car to serve warrant is pretty common actually. They turned the other cheek when they saw him rolling the blunt and went back to looking for their suspect.

Jumping to conclusions like "killed for smoking weed" is the kinda thing that led to riots and another man dead during.
Click to expand...
The media colluded with DWS and the DNC to smear Sanders..do you believe everything you read?..I'm not one for conspiracy theory..I'm for factual theory and right now the facts don't add up.

I'm supposed to believe, this guy was rolling a dube with a gun on the seat next to him and an ankle holster empty..waiting for his kid off the bus?

1. WTF rolls outside (off your own property)? Do any of you do this? I sure as hell don't..the people I know don't, millennials as well as weed smokers from the 60s, all smoke at home and they don't take ANY shit with them.

2. No way in HELL they got any DNA back 'and it matches'. They're lying.

3. They're lying.

4. Why not release all the vid?

5. They're lying.
 
Last edited:
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick said:
I also found this disturbing. The only concern was their own safety. Yes, they rendered assistance, but it was the last thing on their minds. These cops are pussies. Talk to a retired cop. Ask them how many times they actually took a punch in the line of duty - it was plenty. These poor fuckers never had a chance - they get gunned down from 20 feet.

These people never should have been police.


Hey, maybe it is just me, there are so many shootings it is hard to keep track - but wasn't one of this week's cop murders supposed to be by a black cop?

These folks are being murdered for lack of respect to the po-po. Fuck the po-po.
Click to expand...
It's not that its hard to keep track..its being sensationalized..we have become 'the Hunger Games' thanks to the web and social networking. Things that would have suppressed in the past have now come to light and are being reported.

Ratings, ratings and more ratings gotta keep those advertisers happy.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Wilderb said:
I was thinking the exact same thing. The body cam guy puts his camera behind the truck just as the shots are fired. I would be curious what department policy is on body cams. And if they are used as "training tools". Who wears them, who doesn't.
Not really surprising I guess. They now seem to have a policy that we are all guilty if they accuse us and they will punish us if we try to stand up for our rights.
If they really thought he had a gun, why the fuck were they feet away? Why wouldn't you pull back and deescalate?
Because that's not seen as powerful, and these fucks have to believe they are powerful.
Any one of us could have been that guy.
Reminds me of watching more than one guy get pummeled by the cops in days past. Back then they shouted "stop resisting" as they were beating you.
Not they shout "drop the gun" before they shoot you.
Glad I don't deal with cops anymore.
WE
Click to expand...
Not to mention that the guy cuffing the now deceased Scott..appeared to struggle with the dead mans wrists..I wonder if they are gonna add 'resisting' to the charges?
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
A lab that can do it in 30 days is doing a great job. 60 days is acceptable. This still seems like a long time for one test, doesn't it? Except that it's not one test - it's several tests. And it's not one piece of evidence. To conserve overall time and cost, labs batch together cases and test them simultaneously. (Trust me, without batching, it would take even longer.)

http://intrensic.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-does-dna-testing-take-so-long.html

FTW..NOTE: no pieces of the ankle holster was missing for extraction portion of DNA.

They're lying.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
Or yall could try reading the whole article I linked you. Plain clothes cops unmarked car to serve warrant is pretty common actually. They turned the other cheek when they saw him rolling the blunt and went back to looking for their suspect.

Jumping to conclusions like "killed for smoking weed" is the kinda thing that led to riots and another man dead during.
Click to expand...
STFU birther
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
A lab that can do it in 30 days is doing a great job. 60 days is acceptable. This still seems like a long time for one test, doesn't it? Except that it's not one test - it's several tests. And it's not one piece of evidence. To conserve overall time and cost, labs batch together cases and test them simultaneously. (Trust me, without batching, it would take even longer.)

http://intrensic.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-does-dna-testing-take-so-long.html

FTW..NOTE: no pieces of the ankle holster was missing for extraction portion of DNA.

They're lying.
Click to expand...
"Trust you"...?

You don't even know how to vote, wtf do you know about DNA tests?
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
The media colluded with DWS and the DNC to smear Sanders..do you believe everything you read?..I'm not one for conspiracy theory..I'm for factual theory and right now the facts don't add up.

I'm supposed to believe, this guy was rolling a dube with a gun on the seat next to him and an ankle holster empty..waiting for his kid off the bus?

1. WTF rolls outside (off your own property)? Do any of you do this? I sure as hell don't..the people I know don't, millennials as well as weed smokers from the 60s, all smoke at home and they don't take ANY shit with them.

2. No way in HELL they got any DNA back 'and it matches'. They're lying.

3. They're lying.

4. Why not release all the vid?

5. They're lying.
Click to expand...
No, I don't. Eyewitness testimony is fact, until its not. For example of a non-witness Lyric Scott: "“The police just shot my daddy four times for being black,” she says. “They Tased him first and then shot him.” "They shot my daddy 'cause he's black," she said. "He was sitting in his car reading a mother******* book. So they shot him. That's what happened."

Turns out he wasn't shot for being black and there was no taser.
But this seems to be your kind of "facts" on this matter.

An actual fact is that Keith Scott was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and evading arrest with a vehicle in Texas.

I rolled outside all the time in the South. Only bring what you might need for the day though in case it gets confiscated, always film the police encounter. Its just a misdemeanor traffic ticket.

Let me be clear, so far I think Bentley Vinson overreacted. I can see how a new cop might see an "imminent threat" perhaps but I think if a shot was involved here, MAYBE ONE SHOT in the leg or something would have sufficed, unless a gun was without a doubt pointed directly at him, in which case; unload the whole mag on him.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
No, I don't. Eyewitness testimony is fact, until its not. For example of a non-witness Lyric Scott: "“The police just shot my daddy four times for being black,” she says. “They Tased him first and then shot him.” "They shot my daddy 'cause he's black," she said. "He was sitting in his car reading a mother******* book. So they shot him. That's what happened."

Turns out he wasn't shot for being black and there was no taser.
But this seems to be your kind of "facts" on this matter.

An actual fact is that Keith Scott was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and evading arrest with a vehicle in Texas.

I rolled outside all the time in the South. Only bring what you might need for the day though in case it gets confiscated, always film the police encounter. Its just a misdemeanor traffic ticket.

Let me be clear, so far I think Bentley Vinson overreacted. I can see how a new cop might see an "imminent threat" perhaps but I think if a shot was involved here, MAYBE ONE SHOT in the leg or something would have sufficed, unless a gun was without a doubt pointed directly at him, in which case; unload the whole mag on him.
Click to expand...
Lyric Scott has been widely discredit due to his association with MSM.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top