bernie and jane are lawyering up!

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Calling me an idiot because I know my rights and exercise them? Okay...

Look, I don't know what it's like where you live, but where I live if you give a cop a "reason" to get out of his car he's going to use any excuse he can yo punch you in the mouth. My response is to say nothing and comply with any orders given. I'd rather have my shit confiscated or broken than get put in the back of the car cause I said something I shouldn't have.
What the fuck are you doing when stopped?

If you're not doing anything illegal give them their 5 min power trip, bullshit them about how you understand and appreciate the difficult work they do, etc.

Next time you get pulled over by that officer he won't even bother you.

Most cops do a "dickhead exam", your first reaction is crucial to establish you are not a dickhead.

I'm all for "exercising my rights" but that's a jump to extremes if you're not actually doing anything wrong.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
"Hey officer"

"Licence and registration."

"No problem"

"Where you going tonight?"

"Home"

"Have a good night"

"Thanks Officer"
"i saw you were coming from area X Y or Z. it's known for problem A, B or C. what were you doing there"

"my lawyer has advised me that i do not have to answer that"

"well do you mind if i search the car for A B or C?"

"my lawyer has advised me not to consent to any searches. i'll be happy to if you have a warrant"

"have a good night"

"thanks officer"
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
"i saw you were coming from area X Y or Z. it's known for problem A, B or C. what were you doing there"

"my lawyer has advised me that i do not have to answer that"

"well do you mind if i search the car for A B or C?"

"my lawyer has advised me not to consent to any searches. i'll be happy to if you have a warrant"

"have a good night"

"thanks officer"
That's fair enough, I thought we were just talking about the usual "stop and check".
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Donald said to the voters I'm better than her. She's worse than me.
he also ran a well-coordinated disinformation campaign with the russians (fake news, collusion, espionage, data sharing with the kremlin). it worked very well for putin in ukraine too.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
he also ran a well-coordinated disinformation campaign with the russians (fake news, collusion, espionage, data sharing with the kremlin). it worked very well for putin in ukraine too.
There's so little there that Russians "not involved" in the "nothing" are suffering a lot of mysterious accidents.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I think a child's abacus would be too many numbers for these.
i'm not sure if the electoral weight of their votes is actually 3x, but they get two whole senators for the 500,000 or so retards who live there.

california gets the same number of senators for the 40 million productive liberals who rule that state.

so it really is worse than 3x in terms of representation. it's more like 80x.

we really should update the states to a zonal type of parliamentary system.
 

ArcticGranite

Well-Known Member
i'm not sure if the electoral weight of their votes is actually 3x, but they get two whole senators for the 500,000 or so retards who live there.

california gets the same number of senators for the 40 million productive liberals who rule that state.

so it really is worse than 3x in terms of representation. it's more like 80x.

we really should update the states to a zonal type of parliamentary system.
IMG_7075.PNG
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You literally just proved his point, lol!
i expressed doubt about remembering the number right. he has the numbers in front of him that not only prove me right, but show that i am more right than i originally thought.

what is that saying again? something about "it is a shame that the wise are so full of doubt, while the stupid are so certain"
 
Top