beenthere, let me assist you in understanding the meaning of "answer questions". This thread is your chance to showcase who you are, what you believe (esp. politically), and why. You are in complete control of your responses here.
But an answer, in order to qualify as such, must generate substantive, consistent information about ... who you are, what you think and why. Most of the questions are posed to probe just that. What I find unfortunate 9bordering on offensive) is that you are striving mightily to not provide answers while engaging in jesuitry sich as claiming "did too!".
You promised to answer questions in this thread. Answers are substantive things in which you commit a real opinion to the audience. I wonder if you'll begin playing by these rules. Otherwise, imo you are duty-bound to rescind your pledge to ... answer questions. cn
<add> Note, for instance, lifegoesonbrah's post above. The simple fact that I do not agree with it means that he has provided substantive, discussible information about what he thinks. And as such, i respect his post even as I disagree with it, because he has at least provided enough meat for me to sink my teeth into it. If you provide answers with which one cannot even disagree, you're only showcasing your penchant for evasion.