Ask beenthere here!
- Thread starter mr2shim
- Start date
newatit2010
Well-Known Member
Damn I feel old lmfao.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hush up, boy.
mccumcumber
Well-Known Member
How do you feel about Romney's foreign policy?
I constantly see it argued that dems will make government bigger.. etc. However, Raegan made more government jobs than Obama has. http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/06/paul-krugman-ronald-reagan-barack-obama-keynesian-economics.php?m=1
What do you think is an acceptable amount of government jobs, if any? Do you think that a tax raise is ever warranted, note that Raegan also implemented the highest tax increase in history (at the time) in 1986. http://mises.org/freemarket_detail.aspx?control=488
Adjusted to inflation, our minimum wage is lower than it was in 1968. If it were to be adjusted to equal of 1968, it would be at $10.25 +/- $0.25 (I don't remember the exact amount). What do you think ought to be done about this?
The tea party is one of the largest government "entities," for lack of a better word. If you align with the tea party, how do you respond to Nader's questions: https://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/10/22-9.
I constantly see it argued that dems will make government bigger.. etc. However, Raegan made more government jobs than Obama has. http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/06/paul-krugman-ronald-reagan-barack-obama-keynesian-economics.php?m=1
What do you think is an acceptable amount of government jobs, if any? Do you think that a tax raise is ever warranted, note that Raegan also implemented the highest tax increase in history (at the time) in 1986. http://mises.org/freemarket_detail.aspx?control=488
Adjusted to inflation, our minimum wage is lower than it was in 1968. If it were to be adjusted to equal of 1968, it would be at $10.25 +/- $0.25 (I don't remember the exact amount). What do you think ought to be done about this?
The tea party is one of the largest government "entities," for lack of a better word. If you align with the tea party, how do you respond to Nader's questions: https://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/10/22-9.
mccumcumber
Well-Known Member
Claiming that you're old, but still using dumb acronyms such as lmfao seems contradictory. I'm not even thirty yet (close though) and I find that shit to be immature.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
There, I fixed it for you. You had the first sentence right, you should have just stopped there.
REMEMBER THE SPOTTED OWL©
I've already answered that a few times canndo, please quit be disingenuous, I thought you were above that?
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Remember my little essay about answers? The brown-highlighted text wasn't one. I would definitely refrain from using the word "disingenuous" in your case, since it does look as if you're projecting the term as a diversion from your own ... unwillingness to shoot straight. cn
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yep. the guy who thinks minority rights should be put to a majority vote is also the guy who has uncovered a decades in the making conspiracy involving thousands of scientists in dozens of countries that even the skeptics now have joined in on.
be proud of yourself. remember, lemmings, eco loons, spotted owl, suicidal, rinse, repeat.
canndo
Well-Known Member
How much does the federal government spend on PR beenthere? Because I "can't see" what you are lead to believe does not make me clueless. Again, how much does the government of the united states spend on PR?
- you have yet to answer my question actually, you believe that misinterpreting it and answering your misinterpetation is answering my question. it is is not.
And I believe there are more questions for you to answer - I agreed to post only one at a time and wait until you answered the previous one first.
You claim that you always answer questions and that we who say you are not are wrong - in fact you scoffed at the idea that you never answer questions. So far you have answered very few and given a host of reasons why you have not. Is it posible for you to simply answer? there are folks other than me waiting.
First I will disagree with you calling the Tea Party a government entity, not even close Sparky!
And you posted a bad link.
mccumcumber
Well-Known Member
Actually, Reagan raised the spending on the department of education, which he promised to abolish, and social security. Not to mention "drought relief," Medicare, and Federal entitlement. All of which you're against I assume?
When I said acceptable amount of Govt jobs I meant a percentage, should have clarified that.
There's a reason I said for lack of a better word. I don't know what to call the tea party, they are an entity that has to do with government... So that's where I got that phrase. What would you call them. Also, of you actually want to see the article, just google Nader 10 questions tea party. Something ought to show up.
When I said acceptable amount of Govt jobs I meant a percentage, should have clarified that.
There's a reason I said for lack of a better word. I don't know what to call the tea party, they are an entity that has to do with government... So that's where I got that phrase. What would you call them. Also, of you actually want to see the article, just google Nader 10 questions tea party. Something ought to show up.