$1200 dollar budget for 8'x4', strips or Cobs?

Serva

Well-Known Member
What kind of efficiency are you guys getting from the strips?
What's it take to hit 60% efficiency with strips?
What do you mean? EB strips (gen2) will hit 190 lm/w and Samsung F series will hit 200 lm/w, if run softly. Q series can hit 220 lm/w, but it‘s not affordable to run them that soft with the currently avaible designs.

2 EB strips, 2ft = 1 F series, 2ft

So F series or any other LM561C build is only a better choice atm when you want to beat 190 lm/w. F series costs twice as much. 2x EB strips will have 3x more diods than 1x F strip. This will give a better light, because it‘s more diffuse.

If you do strips you'll just have to train and scrog more to get more dense buds
A more diffuse light can penetrate deeper, a special training as mentioned isn‘t necessary so much, than with single source lights.

about 1100 to light 2 4x4s up with 700W each of cobs. youd have to do the math on the strips to compare
For 1200$ you can cover 5/6 of the canopy completly with EB strips running them at nearlly 190 lm/w, and 500-600w (max) would be sufficient without co2.
 
Last edited:

CobKits

Well-Known Member
For 1200$ you can cover 5/6 of the canopy completly with EB strips running them at nearlly 190 lm/w, and 500-600w (max) would be sufficient without co2.
do you want to cover 5/6 of the canopy or do you want to cover all of the canopy?
 

nfhiggs

Well-Known Member
EB strips (gen2) will hit 190 lm/w and Samsung F series will hit 200 lm/w,
I think it might be tough to hit that with the EB strips. They are rated for 175 lm/W but the rated test current is only 42 mA per diode. They already run them really soft to hit that. The Samsung F series, OTOH, actually run pretty hard at their rated test current of 125 mA per diode for 171 lm/W
 

nfhiggs

Well-Known Member
can we see the math on that? (# of strips and current per strip).
24 of the 4 ft strips running at rated current of 700 mA at 39V is 655W at a cost of $325 for the strips plus the driver cost. No heatsinking needed, just a basic frame. That get you to 175 lm/W and about 115k total lumens. To get them to 190 lm/W you would have to double the number of strips and run them at 350 mA. That puts you at 100 strips for both tents at a cost of $1300 just for the strips. Its doable at their spec, but IMO, its not worth the cost trying to get 190 lm/W out of them.
 

Cold$moke

Well-Known Member
Sorry if its off topic are the parts list for the strip builds suitable on the led gardener site?

I dont think i have any problems with the build itself i just need a good parts list
 

Serva

Well-Known Member
do you want to cover 5/6 of the canopy or do you want to cover all of the canopy?
Sorry, my mother tongue isn‘t english, and it‘s alread hard enough to write sentences, someone can understand... so yes, I guess you already noticed it, „completely“ was wrong.

But if this wasn‘t a rhetorical question, no I don‘t want cover all possibilities for air exchangement... 5/6 of he canopy seems pretty ok though.
 

Serva

Well-Known Member
thanks higgs.
24 of the 4 ft strips running at rated current of 700 mA at 39V is 655W at a cost of $325 for the strips plus the driver cost. No heatsinking needed, just a basic frame. That get you to 175 lm/W and about 115k total lumens. To get them to 190 lm/W you would have to double the number of strips and run them at 350 mA. That puts you at 100 strips for both tents at a cost of $1300 just for the strips. Its doable at their spec, but IMO, its not worth the cost trying to get 190 lm/W out of them.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/bridgelux-eb-series-build.928676/page-94#post-14050509

I run nearlly all my EB strips at half current. I don‘t see any reason to run them at nominal current?! The spread is way better this way... 2x better spread than F-series, and 3x more diods... sounds reasonable to pay 16% more for the EB strips.

And if you want to save some money, don‘t get than many strips, run them for 180 lm/w, but also for 1000$ you will have nearlly 2x more EB strips than F to spread. Covering atleast half of the canopy will give such a great uniformity and penetration. While lowering the distance between light and canopy will increasy efficiency...
 

Serva

Well-Known Member
24 of the 4 ft strips running [...] That puts you at 100 strips for both tents [...]
Actually, what you mean is 50 not 100 strips? Why 24 strips before?

To be more accurate for a 4x8 we need around 1000w (31 w/sqft), running 70x EB strips at 350ma will match this: 950$

Or

35x F-series for same efficiency, but only 1/3 diods, and 1/2 spread: 720$ (-25%)
 
Last edited:

Randomblame

Well-Known Member
What kind of efficiency are you guys getting from the strips?

LM561C - A1/S6 - 3000K @65mA
VF: 2.9V (max)
Flux: 34.5 lm (min)
QER: 321.6 lm/W
LER: 4.86 µmol/J
-> 2.766 µmol/J

F-Series Gen3 3000K@1120mA
Flux: 4335lm, 168lm/w
QER=4.86 µmol/J
LER=321.60 lm/W
= 2.54 µmol/J
25.8W * 2.54 µmol/J / 14.48$ = 4.53 µmol/$

4000°k F-strips @525mA(~58mA per diode) delivers ~12w with +200lm/w which means ~2,8μMol/J.
3000°k strip would be in the 195lm/w range..
 

wietefras

Well-Known Member
@Randomblame I got a LER of 323,4 for the 3000K LM561C. QER is 4.69 for the 400-700nm PAR range (4.85 for the full range).

Convert from lumen to par PPF by dividing by 69. For the YPF divide by 78.
 
Last edited:
Top