Still proving yourself wrong. Also corporations can't vote, just in case you're too stupid to know that.....never mind.
and this excludes any capital gains. sickening isn't it? and dodd frank amendment, tooYour graph shows highest homeownership rate in 2005, when taxes were lowest, so once again you have proven yourself wrong. You are truly an idiot.
Still can't vote. Were you trying to argue, or just posting irrelevant stuff for no reason?
your savior thinks corporations are people..just setting the record straight.Still can't vote. Were you trying to argue, or just posting irrelevant stuff for no reason?
My savior? So your defense of your statement that corporations can vote is Mitt told you so? (When he clearly didn't.)your savior thinks corporations are people..just setting the record straight.
i'm alluding to the typical GOP mindset, obviously.My savior? So your defense of your statement that corporations can vote is Mitt told you so? (When he clearly didn't.)
corporations ARE people. You aren't a PERSON, you HAVE a person..your savior thinks corporations are people..just setting the record straight.
How would you know if anything is being taken out of context unless you read any of the bill?Ok, so now I got to read the whole 1600 pages? You know, to make sure it is in context? TL;DR
No, corporations are not people, they're corporationscorporations ARE people. You aren't a PERSON, you HAVE a person..
Its fun trying to explain legal terms to people that have no idea what is being said.
yes stupid girl i am..not part of the almost to 1%; like you.corporations ARE people. You aren't a PERSON, you HAVE a person..
Its fun trying to explain legal terms to people that have no idea what is being said.
You just said that Romney was claiming corporations are people. Romney was just repeating what the supreme court decision wasyes stupid girl i am..not part of the almost to 1%; like you.
So now the statement YOU made you try to ascribe to someone else?i'm alluding to the typical GOP mindset, obviously.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/person?s=tsYou just said that Romney was claiming corporations are people. Romney was just repeating what the supreme court decision was
"Corporate personhood is an American legal concept that a corporation, as a group of people, may be recognized as having some of the same legal rights and responsibilities as an individual."
Do you understand they aren't claiming that corporations are flesh and blood people, they are just saying that Corporations have a person, just as you do.
Corporations are people, but they aren't human beings.
We are discussing LEGAL terms, not dictionary references.http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/person?s=ts
Go find where 'corporation' fits and get back to me
Pad, you were just bitching about corporations buying politicians (where's the outrage of politicians accepting bribes btw?).http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/person?s=ts
Go find where 'corporation' fits and get back to me
Whose fault is it?It isnt the fault of the politicians that they accept the money and favors.
It is the politicians fault as they were the ones that took an oath of office and swore to uphold and defend the constitution. If they reported bribes rather than accepted them the circle would be broken.Whose fault is it?