An Open And Civil Debate Before 11:00 AM

Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
Failed logic my friend.
Like all government agencies, sometimes they'r right and sometimes they're wrong, doesn't mean they're right all the time or wrong all the time.
Are there any scientists that have been wrong about their predictions on climate change?
Click to expand...
Padawanbater2 said:
You're making a scientific claim about the environment from a source that makes a scientific claim about the climate. So if you accept one that attempts to use science to back up your claim, you have to accept the other scientific claim from that same source otherwise it would be intellectually dishonest of you to use it.
Click to expand...
 
Dadioski

Dadioski

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
Seriously, what's the big deal about not wanting the Keystone pipeline?
Click to expand...
Well because only un-american assbites want to let some other country pump there fucking nasty ass shale oil across our farm land and major aquifer so it can be sold to other countries and only employ 35 people after it is installed. It's a no brainer, if you have one. Pump it across your own fucking land, now that's the good old American response. Sadly Fox news and others have sold the lemmings a completely different story. Sad really.
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
You guys are weak, read the study again.
35 permanent jobs in pipeline maintenance and inspection.
That's why neither of you ever win an argument, you're easily misled and can't understand what you read.
I'll bet you thought you could keep your doctor if you wanted.:lol:
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Dadioski said:
Well because only un-american assbites want to let some other country pump there fucking nasty ass shale oil across our farm land and major aquifer so it can be sold to other countries and only employ 35 people after it is installed. It's a no brainer, if you have one. Pump it across your own fucking land, now that's the good old American response. Sadly Fox news and others have sold the lemmings a completely different story. Sad really.
Click to expand...
Fox news again.:lol:
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
You guys are weak, read the study again.
35 permanent jobs in pipeline maintenance and inspection.
That's why neither of you ever win an argument, you're easily misled and can't understand what you read.
I'll bet you thought you could keep your doctor if you wanted.:lol:
Click to expand...
That's what your own State Dept. study said, and the 3 sources I cited said as well. 35 PERMANENT jobs, 41,000 TEMPORARY jobs (total, not at the same time).

So tell me more about how this will "create American jobs" you dipshit

You like it because Mitch McConnell and the rest of the republicans like it because they get paid by the fossil fuel industry to push bullshit like this, even though it won't do anything for the Americans paying for it
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
that's what we said and what you disputed all along, moron.
Click to expand...
Common trend with these people, Kynes' butchered summary of Keynesian economics, now this dummy who can't even read his own sources correctly.. Do these people make up the less than 1% of illiterate adults in our country?
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
That's what your own State Dept. study said, and the 3 sources I cited said as well. 35 PERMANENT jobs, 41,000 TEMPORARY jobs (total, not at the same time).

So tell me more about how this will "create American jobs" you dipshit
Click to expand...
Your original argument was that the pipeline would be detrimental to the environment, I supplied a citation from the state department that counters your claim, are you refuting it?

Now you jump to the subject of jobs since your environmental argument fell flat on it's face.

So lets look at your job claim argument.

Anyone with a little common sense could figure out that "37 permanent jobs in maintenance and inspection"
refers to just those specific jobs in maintaining and inspecting the pipeline itself.

The 37 permanent job meme doesn't account for residual jobs.

The pipeline ends in Houston TX where it will be refined.
Adding 500,000 barrels a day of crude oil that needs to be refined.
That alone creates thousands of permeant jobs, dipshit
 
nitro harley

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
That's what your own State Dept. study said, and the 3 sources I cited said as well. 35 PERMANENT jobs, 41,000 TEMPORARY jobs (total, not at the same time).

So tell me more about how this will "create American jobs" you dipshit

You like it because Mitch McConnell and the rest of the republicans like it because they get paid by the fossil fuel industry to push bullshit like this, even though it won't do anything for the Americans paying for it
Click to expand...
Pada.

Sense when is 41,000 jobs a bad thing? I don't get it. It sounds like it will be built whether the Dems like it or not because most of it is done already. I happen to burn fuel for a living so I hope it floods the market and keeps the price down for everybody. Win/Win.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
Your original argument was that the pipeline would be detrimental to the environment, I supplied a citation from the state department that counters your claim, are you refuting it?

Now you jump to the subject of jobs since your environmental argument fell flat on it's face.

So lets look at your job claim argument.

Anyone with a little common sense could figure out that "37 permanent jobs in maintenance and inspection"
refers to just those specific jobs in maintaining and inspecting the pipeline itself.

The 37 permanent job meme doesn't account for residual jobs.

The pipeline ends in Houston TX where it will be refined.
Adding 500,000 barrels a day of crude oil that needs to be refined.
That alone creates thousands of permeant jobs, dipshit
Click to expand...
i posted 5 reasons why, CR obliterated someone's claim that it doesn't leak and fracking chemicals are not used..it does and they do.

the only thing left is the cancer clusters..want to refute that as well?
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Dadioski said:
Well because only un-american assbites want to let some other country pump there fucking nasty ass shale oil across our farm land and major aquifer so it can be sold to other countries and only employ 35 people after it is installed. It's a no brainer, if you have one. Pump it across your own fucking land, now that's the good old American response. Sadly Fox news and others have sold the lemmings a completely different story. Sad really.
Click to expand...
b-r-a-v-o

:clap:

++rep
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
That's what your own State Dept. study said, and the 3 sources I cited said as well. 35 PERMANENT jobs, 41,000 TEMPORARY jobs (total, not at the same time).

So tell me more about how this will "create American jobs" you dipshit

You like it because Mitch McConnell and the rest of the republicans like it because they get paid by the fossil fuel industry to push bullshit like this, even though it won't do anything for the Americans paying for it
Click to expand...
i do love your brain!

+rep

:clap:
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
nitro harley said:
Pada.

Sense when is 41,000 jobs a bad thing? I don't get it. It sounds like it will be built whether the Dems like it or not because most of it is done already. I happen to burn fuel for a living so I hope it floods the market and keeps the price down for everybody. Win/Win.
Click to expand...
Nitro -
yeah, thanks, obama! dems win/win:wink:

IMG_0787.jpg
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
i posted 5 reasons why, CR obliterated someone's claim that it doesn't leak and fracking chemicals are not used..it does and they do.

the only thing left is the cancer clusters..want to refute that as well?
Click to expand...
I don't have to refute it sky, the state departments environmental impact studies did it for me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top