Some are more equal than others...

[Dr Kynes]

That's why I don't declare him an "idiot" like you did Krugman, he's clearly a smart person, Krugman himself even says so, but he's wrong and history shows us that



Same old tired reply "whatever I disagree with is wrong!".. I guess to people like you, reality has a liberal bias..



My argument was very clear to anyone without comprehension issues; You're a partisan hack, each and every one of your posts demonstrates that. Any idea coming from anywhere left of where you reside on the political spectrum is wrong because you say it's wrong. I've got news for you, in order for an idea to be wrong you need to demonstrate why it's wrong, not just declare it so. That's how debate works. I've explained my position and backed it up with historical context. All you've done is piss your pants and call 'foul!'. You can sit in your pissy-pants all day long, it doesn't change the facts and it doesn't change the numbers.

i have repeated HOW YOU ARE WRONG many times.

if outgoings exceed income, Debt, when Debt exceeds assets, Bankruptcy.

the only thing that makes large economies different from small ones is the amount of time and debt needed to tip over the canoe.

this is simple shit, nobody can say its not true, except keynesian "economists" who make the claim based on idiotic theories that have NEVER worked ever.

you ignore these simple facts, pretend that theres some magickal formulae that make macro economics immune to the immutable laws of economics, then with a little handwaving and some fallacies, you proceed to pretend you proved your claims.

THAT is not how debates work.

you havent offered any facts, merely opinions based on assumptions which are fundamentally flawed, and can be refuted by anyone who ever had to balance a checkbook (lol wutz a checkbook?)

you are engaging in argumentum ad populum, appeal to authority, texas sharpshooter, post hoc ergo propter hoc, red herring, strawman, and reductio ad absurdum, with more than a little Baron Munchhausen's Trilemma thrown in for good measure.

 

[UncleBuck]

i have repeated HOW YOU ARE WRONG many times.

NUH UH! BULLSHIT!

wanna debate the price of a dozen eggs in vallejo, sweetheart?

you can't even get that right, and you live there. and presumably buy eggs.

 

[Padawanbater2]

if outgoings exceed income, Debt, when Debt exceeds assets, Bankruptcy.

I'm sure a nobel prize winning economist doesn't know shit about this magical equation you've brought to the table.. Just like NASA doesn't know shit about water vapor or the significance of CO2...

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm sure a nobel prize winning economist doesn't know shit about this magical equation you've brought to the table.. Just like NASA doesn't know shit about water vapor or the significance of CO2...

kynes doesn't even know what a dozen eggs cost in his own home town. he's as stupid as they come.

 

[UncleBuck]

kynes doesn't know how to calculate a fucking exponent.

he really is that fucking stupid.

 

[UncleBuck]

kynes thinks philippe rushton is a "respected academic" but nobel winners know less than him.

about as stupid as it gets.

 

[Dr Kynes]

I'm sure a nobel prize winning economist doesn't know shit about this magical equation you've brought to the table.. Just like NASA doesn't know shit about water vapor or the significance of CO2...

and you jump right back into Appeal To Authority, reductio ad absurdum, and of course, the ever popular Red Herring.

 

[Dr Kynes]

kynes thinks philippe rushton is a "respected academic" but nobel winners know less than him.

about as stupid as it gets.

kynes doesn't know how to calculate a fucking exponent.

he really is that fucking stupid.

kynes thinks philippe rushton is a "respected academic" but nobel winners know less than him.

about as stupid as it gets.

rapid fire shitposts

Aaaand... bucklefucke has shot his bolt.

 

[UncleBuck]

rapid fire shitposts

Aaaand... bucklefucke has shot his bolt.

what's 10^4?

 

[Padawanbater2]

and you jump right back into Appeal To Authority, reductio ad absurdum, and of course, the ever popular Red Herring.

You think Krugman, a nobel prize winning economist, doesn't know how to balance a checkbook

Nothing more needs to be said, your sheer stupidity speaks for itself

 

[Padawanbater2]

@ Dr Kynes, why do you defend economic policies that keep you in the lower income bracket? This is like a battered wife supporting her abusive husband. Your party is keeping you down, so why do you do it?

 

[UncleBuck]

You think Krugman, a nobel prize winning economist, doesn't know how to balance a checkbook

Nothing more needs to be said, your sheer stupidity speaks for itself

i believe krugman's $2.5 million positive balance speaks otherwise, much to kynes' dismay.

and i bet krugman knows how much eggs cost in vallejo.

 

[NoDrama]

@ Dr Kynes, why do you defend economic policies that keep you in the lower income bracket? This is like a battered wife supporting her abusive husband. Your party is keeping you down, so why do you do it?

Some people do not derive their happiness from the amount of zeroes on the end of that pay check.

 

[Padawanbater2]

Some people do not derive their happiness from the amount of zeroes on the end of that pay check.

Well, you certainly used a bad example in Kynes to make that point, because he and other conservatives on the forum do exactly that

 

[Dr Kynes]

Well, you certainly used a bad example in Kynes to make that point, because he and other conservatives on the forum do exactly that

my conservative policies are based on PRINCIPLES, not self interest, or a desire to get somebody else's shit.

my bank account balance is none of your business, and unlike yourself i dont boast of imaginary prosperity to try and win the internet.

if krugman used his own espoused policies in his own finances he would be penniless or in prison with bernie madoff. that makes him a hypocrite.

anyone who can balance a checkbook can see the obvious flaws in his schemes, if he CAN balance a checkbook then he is not merely an ignorant dolt, but rather a despicable con man.

two choices, either krugman is a fool who doesnt understand how budgets work, or he is a lying sack of crap trying to sell us a bill of goods.

there is no third option.

 

[NoDrama]

Well, you certainly used a bad example in Kynes to make that point, because he and other conservatives on the forum do exactly that

And liberals use it as a measure of intelligence. In other words, Krugman has a net worth of more than $2.5 Million = he is really smart.
Wasn't that your example?

 

[UncleBuck]

my conservative policies are based on PRINCIPLES, not self interest, or a desire to get somebody else's shit.

my bank account balance is none of your business, and unlike yourself i dont boast of imaginary prosperity to try and win the internet.

if krugman used his own espoused policies in his own finances he would be penniless or in prison with bernie madoff. that makes him a hypocrite.

anyone who can balance a checkbook can see the obvious flaws in his schemes, if he CAN balance a checkbook then he is not merely an ignorant dolt, but rather a despicable con man.

two choices, either krugman is a fool who doesnt understand how budgets work, or he is a lying sack of crap trying to sell us a bill of goods.

there is no third option.

i put $1000 on my credit card when i was unemployed and near broke to build my first grow. it paid me back several times over and is now the basis of my entire economy.

debt spending on infrastructure worked, and according to you, household finances are exactly like a nation's finances.

so how is krugman wrong then?

 

[ChesusRice]

my conservative policies are based on PRINCIPLES, not self interest, or a desire to get somebody else's shit.

my bank account balance is none of your business, and unlike yourself i dont boast of imaginary prosperity to try and win the internet.

if krugman used his own espoused policies in his own finances he would be penniless or in prison with bernie madoff. that makes him a hypocrite.

anyone who can balance a checkbook can see the obvious flaws in his schemes, if he CAN balance a checkbook then he is not merely an ignorant dolt, but rather a despicable con man.

two choices, either krugman is a fool who doesnt understand how budgets work, or he is a lying sack of crap trying to sell us a bill of goods.

there is no third option.

Name a company without a line of credit

 

[Padawanbater2]

my conservative policies are based on PRINCIPLES, not self interest, or a desire to get somebody else's shit.

my bank account balance is none of your business, and unlike yourself i dont boast of imaginary prosperity to try and win the internet.

if krugman used his own espoused policies in his own finances he would be penniless or in prison with bernie madoff. that makes him a hypocrite.

anyone who can balance a checkbook can see the obvious flaws in his schemes, if he CAN balance a checkbook then he is not merely an ignorant dolt, but rather a despicable con man.

two choices, either krugman is a fool who doesnt understand how budgets work, or he is a lying sack of crap trying to sell us a bill of goods.

there is no third option.

Where have I "boasted" about my prosperity? I wasn't aware simply stating the fact I don't live with my mom is now "boasting" about my lifestyle.. Even funnier since another conservitard brought it up in the first place, I was simply defending my position

You're not in a position to make such a retarded claim. How would you know how Krugman balances his finances? Exactly, you wouldn't. Such statements make you look stupid

The third option (and the more likely one) is that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. I think I'll go with that one..

And liberals use it as a measure of intelligence. In other words, Krugman has a net worth of more than $2.5 Million = he is really smart.
Wasn't that your example?

No, Kynes said Krugman couldn't balance a checkbook. I brought up his net worth because it clearly says otherwise. If a man who won the nobel prize in economics can't balance a checkbook, how would you suppose he'd accumulate a net worth of $2.5 million?

 

[Dr Kynes]

Where have I "boasted" about my prosperity? I wasn't aware simply stating the fact I don't live with my mom is now "boasting" about my lifestyle.. Even funnier since another conservitard brought it up in the first place, I was simply defending my position

You're not in a position to make such a retarded claim. How would you know how Krugman balances his finances? Exactly, you wouldn't. Such statements make you look stupid

The third option (and the more likely one) is that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. I think I'll go with that one..



No, Kynes said Krugman couldn't balance a checkbook. I brought up his net worth because it clearly says otherwise. If a man who won the nobel prize in economics can't balance a checkbook, how would you suppose he'd accumulate a net worth of $2.5 million?

how do i know how krugman runs his personal finances?
easy.

1: IF he in fact does have 2.5 mil in the bank, then he is not broke.
2: not bein broke demonstrates clearly that he isnt using his own "Spend Every Dime, Then Spend More On Credit" programme in his personal life
3: THEREFORE he does not use his own theories himself, but instead proposes those schemes for use only with Other People's Money
4: thus he is a typical lefty. just like you.

i said, and i quote:

neither of those clowns could balance a household budget using their wacky schemes, and if they tried it they would be in the poorhouse.

l

so it's not that they CANT balance a checkbook, but rather, their crazy inane theories make such a task impossible for them, unless, like typical lefties, their schemes are only for use with Other People's Money, not their own.

it's not that subtle a distinction, everyone who doesnt have a metal bar through their head could see it, 'cept you.