Sorry, but for all that didn't vote in Florida---- you S_ _ K !!!!***!!#!!##*

[Red1966]

Because I believe gay people have the same civil rights as anyone else?
Which you obviously dont becuase you wish to impose your religous beliefs on others?

How does your forcing your beliefs on others equate to him forcing his on others? You are the one demanding others compromise their beliefs by partaking in an action they are philosophically opposed to, not he.

 

[Red1966]

yay another religious fucktards who doesn't understand the main tenent of marriage in the civilized world is CONSENT you know as in "I do"

Now you might love fido and your coffee table very much but you'll struggle to prove they consent to marrying you.....

Hey, it was the coffee table that asked me, not me asking the coffee table.

 

[UncleBuck]

the forcing of marriage of gay couples in that chapel is a bad thing for liberty

they're not being forced to marry anyone. they are being forced to comply with civil rights. they also have the option to shut down if they want to deny basic civil rights.

are you saying civil rights is anti-liberty?\

the single word of marriage is what has you upset.

nope, that's you. otherwise you wouldn't be arguing for a "separate but equal" institution.

where have we heard that before?

are the two of you for the right for someone to marry an animal or inanimate object.

once toaster ovens and horses can consent, i'll gladly fight for your right to stick your dick into one.

 

[UncleBuck]

Dr. Keynes sent me a PM warning me to change it or they would crucify me for it.

you bible thumping racist fucktards really do stick together.

 

[UncleBuck]

I would agree, but isn't the definition of marriage as a holy union between man and woman?
I'm not against Gay marriage at all, but government has seen fit to tax married people differently and to give married people additional privileges in certain legal, circumstances, compared to single people that is.

So, with marriage now being mostly a government sanctioning scheme and divorce being nothing more than a lawyer filling out some paperwork, you don't really have to be gay, nor in love, nor even have any religious ceremony to get all the benefits of married people.

I can see college guys getting married just so they can use the marital benefits, especially when it comes to government assistance. Hell I can see guys getting married just so that one won't be compelled to bear witness against the other in a court of law.

Traditionally, marriage was a religious union, now the religion has been removed and replaced with rules and benefits that other people do not get, merely because they don't have the government paper that licenses them to get married.

This is more complicated than men in love so much that they want to spend the rest of their lives with one another.

If government all of a sudden removed itself from marriage and nullified all the laws and exceptions between single and married, would gays still want to be married officially?

another factually challenged bigot steps up to the plate and exposes himself as a bigot. hardly surprising.

 

[NoDrama]

another factually challenged bigot steps up to the plate and exposes himself as a bigot. hardly surprising.

Wouldn't a bigot be against gay marriage?

You sure are stupid today.

 

[Mindmelted]

Wouldn't a bigot be against gay marriage?

You sure are stupid today.

Today!

 

[ChesusRice]

Wouldn't a bigot be against gay marriage?

You sure are stupid today.

She is againt gay marriage

 

[ginjawarrior]

But you idiots keep pushing liberty. so answer the question.

fido and coffee table can't consent so no I do not support them as marriage material...

And the main tenant of marriage is not consent, but that it must be between man and woman. That's why we are having this debate.

Note I said "civilised world" we could rid marrage of your bigoted view and still have a wedding... Try removing "I do" see what you have left

And I love how all of my questions have been avoided. Great job all.

Your question was answered you were just too dumb to notice

 

[Figgy]

fido and coffee table can't consent so no I do not support them as marriage material...

Note I said "civilised world" we could rid marrage of your bigoted view and still have a wedding... Try removing "I do" see what you have left

Your question was answered you were just too dumb to notice

Lol. Great way to bring up consent again! It's the only thing you have to use to try to avoid the question. You still are an idiot.

"Civilized" world? Sure thing buddy.

You can't answer my question because it points to your argument as being presented falsely as a liberty argument. I love word games, but they do not work against me.

Keep trying though. You're getting no closer to cohesion.

Now come back and bash Christianity like all the other mindless morons here, or just google a picture so you can feel better about yourself. It seems to work for the others.

 

[Figgy]

Here's a conundrum for ya. If government got out of marriage all together what would the gay community do? Marriage would then continue to be only between man and woman with no option of a same sex marriage at all. So what would you do then?

 

[ginjawarrior]

Lol. Great way to bring up consent again! It's the only thing you have to use to try to avoid the question.

Edit: here's a question - are the two of you for the right for someone to marry an animal or inanimate object.

fido and coffee table can't consent so no I do not support them as marriage material...

Note I said "civilised world" we could rid marrage of your bigoted view and still have a wedding... Try removing "I do" see what you have left

Your question was answered you were just too dumb to notice

"Civilized" world? Sure thing buddy.

Consent is key where I'm from

You can't answer my question because it points to your argument as being presented falsely as a liberty argument. I love word games, but they do not work against me.

already answered dumb arse

Now come back and bash Christianity

well if you didn't make it so easy.....

 

[ginjawarrior]

Here's a conundrum for ya. If government got out of marriage all together what would the gay community do? Marriage would then continue to be only between man and woman with no option of a same sex marriage at all. So what would you do then?

Marriage without official backing is meaningless any way...

 

[Figgy]

Marriage without official backing is meaningless any way...

Official backing? Lmao!!!!! Best response ever!!!!

Looks like I just screwed up someone's world real quick!

Edit: Is "official backing" also a liberty? lol!!! I thought this can't get better, but it just did!

 

[ginjawarrior]

Official backing? Lmao!!!!! Best response ever!!!!

Looks like I just screwed up someone's world real quick!

want to know the funniest part? Its true...


you seem to have gone all quiet about that stupid fucking question of yours I was thinking you had some special trap waiting for us

 

[Figgy]

want to know the funniest part? Its true...


you seem to have gone all quiet about that stupid fucking question of yours I was thinking you had some special trap waiting for us

True? Ok buddy.... It's only real if the government says it is? Genius thinking there!

I'm not quiet, just waiting for a logical response which has not been presented.

Thank you, come again.

 

[ginjawarrior]

True? Ok buddy.... It's only real if the government says it is? Genius thinking there!

I said "meaningless"...
The governments role in marriage is that its a legally binding contravt . remove governments role and you have nothing more than an elaborate " pinky swear" with cake and drunk relatives

Either party could wake up one day, declare marriage over with zero recourse from otherside

I'm not quiet, just waiting for a logical response which has not been presented

You asked if we supported it or not, I do not...

You were looking for an answer that fits with your churches echo chamber, your lost with anything else.......

 

[NoDrama]

Marriage without official backing is meaningless any way...

Most people get married because they love each other and want to be life partners. Not because they will get some official government benefits. Which is why many gays want to get married,benefits, not love.

 

[ginjawarrior]

Most people get married because they love each other and want to be life partners.

"pinky swear"

There's a reason why People use a church or registry's office or somebody legally able to perform ceremony. If they just want to be life partners "pinky swear" is all they need

Not because they will get some official government benefits.

not everyone in the world is as reliant on government benefits as you are

Which is why many gays want to get married,benefits, not love.

You talking from experience on this one? Have you been hurt before?

AKA "your bigotry is showing"

 

[NoDrama]

"pinky swear"

There's a reason why People use a church or registry's office or somebody legally able to perform ceremony. If they just want to be life partners "pinky swear" is all they need


not everyone in the world is as reliant on government benefits as you are


You talking from experience on this one? Have you been hurt before?

AKA "your bigotry is showing"

When I read your posts I always use the accent of a coal miner from Virginia.