I used my Obama care and here are the facts...

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
i've answered your question many times over, you are apparently too dense to understand the reply though.

hence your rebuttal that you are a special little snowflake who will never need to pay for medical care. and, of course, the repeated references to wendy's, which you are also apparently too dense to understand are painfully unfunny.

it's super easy to say you'll just go ahead and die when an expensive medical procedure could save you from the comfort of the internet, rather than your soon to be death bed. it's almost easier to be that hero than it is to repeatedly declare victory and rest on the laurels of a future prediction which will inevitably prove false.

It is painfully unfunny when somebody shits all over property they do not own. We agree there. If you'd like I can switch it up and go back to gerbils, as you do have a point about the repetitive nature of the Wendy's thing...poopy pants.


You never answered why it is okay for one person or group of people to make another person or group associate with another under the threat of force when the aggressed against party is not the one initiating the force. Didn't you ever learn not to be the one that starts shit ?

Obviously initiated aggression thru legislation is STILL initiated aggression, unless people magically carve out a giant exception for coercive government to do things thru force that would be reprehensible if you or I did it.
You advocate this, yet you somehow think of your actions as a noble thing. Why?

It's super easy to hit the potty. Years ago when my sons were little boys they all learned how by the time they were 2 years old. Why can't you?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
are you talking about the "justly acquired land" that robroy acquired through genocide of native populations?
First, I did not kill any indigenous people. By the time that I acquired my property they had all been killed by people like you that thought it was okay to initiate aggression and call it something else.

Are you saying I should restitute long ago dead people for the actions of somebody else that killed them years ago ? How would I do that?
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
First, I did not kill any indigenous people. By the time that I acquired my property they had all been killed by people like you that thought it was okay to initiate aggression and call it something else.

Are you saying I should restitute long ago dead people for the actions of somebody else that killed them years ago ? How would I do that?
Lefty route to absolution:
•Vote Democrat
•Hate rich people
•Give it to the blacks

Only then you shall be absolved of your dirty racist sins.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Lefty route to absolution:
•Vote Democrat
•Hate rich people
•Give it to the blacks

Only then you shall be absolved of your dirty racist sins.

I prefer to treat people as individuals their actions speak louder to me than their skin color.

The dirtiest sin is taking another persons life in an act of initiated aggression. This can be done slowly while they are still alive via legislation of approved aggression or quickly by laying down a murderous landmine for them to unsuspectingly slip in while using a fast food establishments rest room.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
I prefer to treat people as individuals their actions speak louder to me than their skin color.

The dirtiest sin is taking another persons life in an act of initiated aggression. This can be done slowly while they are still alive via legislation of approved aggression or quickly by laying down a murderous landmine for them to unsuspectingly slip in while using a fast food establishments rest room.
Racist.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You never answered why it is okay for one person or group of people to make another person or group associate with another under the threat of force when the aggressed against party is not the one initiating the force.
i actually have many times, you seem to ignore the concepts of reality staring you in the fucking face.

we have told you many times that you are not forced to serve black people, princess. you can open a private club.

how many times have we told you this now? are you so senile that you just block out this advice?

how long is it gonna take your racist ass to see that we have tried it your way, and it caused harm?

are you ever gonna acknowledge that your model of denial of service caused lots of harm?

no, you won't acknowledge that.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
First, I did not kill any indigenous people. By the time that I acquired my property they had all been killed
that sounds perfectly justly acquired.

so can i send my dad to kill you and take your house, and then when he dies, i can just move into your house and call it justly acquired?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I prefer to treat people as individuals their actions speak louder to me than their skin color.
you keep saying you are not racist, but you are very, very racist.

one can not mention civil rights without you being unable to control your obvious disgust at the thought of having to serve black people equally with all others.

that, and you call the president by racial slurs repeatedly.

what kind of a person calls the president by racial slurs and rails against civil rights constantly?

a racist. that is you.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
My calls for equal rights, equally, for all people regardless of race, gender, sexuality and socioeconomic group are TOTALLY racist.
except that your posts scream the opposite.

do you really think you can make racist post after racist post, get called on it, say "but i'm not racist!" and people will actually believe you?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
imagine that, you post racist stuff all morning, i call it out as racist, you get asshurt, and resort to the same tactics that the white supremacy crew used to.

harrekin is 4'11'' and 11 years old.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
imagine that, you post racist stuff all morning, i call it out as racist, you get asshurt, and resort to the same tactics that the white supremacy crew used to.

harrekin is 4'11'' and 11 years old.
She certainly has a big mouth, did she eat ALL the cupcakes at the wedding?

 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
i actually have many times, you seem to ignore the concepts of reality staring you in the fucking face.

we have told you many times that you are not forced to serve black people, princess. you can open a private club.

how many times have we told you this now? are you so senile that you just block out this advice?

how long is it gonna take your racist ass to see that we have tried it your way, and it caused harm?

are you ever gonna acknowledge that your model of denial of service caused lots of harm?

no, you won't acknowledge that.

You accept the recreation of the meanings of words for your convenience or put on your cheer leader dress and get out the pom poms when your nanny state does it. Go Nanny Go !! (then you turn a cartwheel amidst a pyramid of flag waving red white and blue clad barking gerbils )

Also, you like to use the black person example, which is an attempt to narrow the conversation into your "you must be a racist argument" ...that's a lame trolling tactic and a false conclusion that lacks evidence.

Don't you think black people have the right to use their bodies and their property in ways that only they determine absent any threats of force? Do you think black people should be forced to serve somebody they do not want to have on their property ? I thought you were against enslaving people? Can't black people decide how they will use their bodies too?


Also private property is and can only be private property if the OWNER controls it, not some outside influence or not some pseudo thing that the legislation attempted to create. Dividing private property into classes of private property wherein the "owner" in some instances enjoys the rights of ownership and in other instances they don't changes the meaning of the word into two distinctly separate things. Government word smithing...you, like most sheep believe what you are told rather than critically examining things for logic and consistency.

So called private property is what you and the legislation have turned private property into when you remove the essential element of what private property is...control over an owned thing.

Denial of service is not an act of aggression. It is an exercise by an autonomous and free person to choose their associations based on mutual assent. Allowing one party to make anothers choices for them as to whether or not they will interact, removes freedom. Interactions, to be peaceful require MUTUAL ASSENT..... (no rapist tactics allowed). That concept is not a racial concept dum dum, it is a concept that applies to everybody equally.

You keep trying to embed the meaning of initiated aggression into an act of indifference, which is really not very logical or consistent on your part. If indifference causes harm, then you are responsible for my leaky roof, because your NOT fixing it has caused me harm....you fucking roof racist!
 
Last edited:
Top