ZOMG! Rand Paul hates drones killing terrorists, but is ok to use on Americans

Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
wha?...Executive Priv. not in the Constitution...but but but

Lets talk about Executive Privilidge being used on Fast and Furious.

Well, a spell checker helps, I got it. You said you wanted to talk about...never mind.

Thesaurus...what was the other word for that word?:)
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
He was talking about using them without cause.

If you don't see the distinction, you should just go back to your lady-boy.
Click to expand...
“I will speak until I can no longer speak,” Paul said as he began. “I will speak as long as it takes, until the alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our Constitution is important, that your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty by a court.”
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-03-06/politics/37497854_1_modern-filibuster-filibuster-end-debate

NO I ThINK HE WAS COMPLAINING ABOUT USING THEM ON US SOIL THAT WAS UNTIL YESTERDAY WHEN HE SAID WE COULD USE THEM TO BLOW UP A LIQOUR STORE ROBBERY SUSPECT

"I've never argued against any technology being used when you have an imminent threat, an active crime going on," Paul said. "If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and fifty dollars in cash. I don't care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him."
http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/04/23/ron_paul_fans_furious_over_rand_pauls_drone_flip_flop
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
Harrekin said:
Dude, someone in the process of committing a crime is different to someone googling how bombs are made out of curiosity.

Opossum head was protesting in defense of the latter, I don't even like the faux-Libertarian Paul family but lets not talk complete bullshit.

Wanna talk about something significant? Lets talk about Executive Privilidge being used on Fast and Furious.
Click to expand...
According to MSNBC that didn't happen can't find anything but an opinion piece... On aother totally unrelated note, O'dogz will be speaking at the planned parenthood conference on Friday...
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
You mean to tell me CNN took something a politician who does not share the current admin agenda, and took it out of context to make that person look like an idiot????


And Cheezusisfuckingdumb took the story and ran with it? totally believing everything he was just told by the same news agency that has been caught multiple times making shit up?

Nothing unusual about that.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Sen. Rand Paul’s scramble this week to clarify his remarks on whether drone killings should be allowed on American soil underscores a key challenge facing the ambitious Kentucky politician: translating his libertarian principles into clear policy positions.
Mr. Paul, a likely 2016 contender for the Republican presidential nomination, said Tuesday that “I don’t care” if drones are used to kill gun-toting liquor store thieves — a comment that sparked an outcry from some of the small-government advocates and strict constitutionalists who have championed the Kentuckian.
They dubbed him a “traitor” and wondered how he could be OK with the government targeting common criminals with drone strikes just weeks after arguing in his high-profile 13-hour filibuster earlier this year that “no American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty by a court.”


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/24/rand-paul-sticking-with-drone-stance-after-mistake/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS#ixzz2RT6nRxNT
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Balzac89 said:
Americans are killed on American soill by police everyday. Why does it matter if it is a gun or a missle?
Click to expand...
So you are in favor of militarizing the police even more? And I am pretty sure that a missle might have some problems with "over blast"

Kinda makes Rand paul a hypocrite of the highest order doesn't it?
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
So you are in favor of militarizing the police even more? And I am pretty sure that a missle might have some problems with "over blast"

Kinda makes Rand paul a hypocrite of the highest order doesn't it?
Click to expand...
Nope, it makes you an idiot for not understanding context.

Go on, speak some more and remove all doubt, me so horny.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Nope, it makes you an idiot for not understanding context.

Go on, speak some more and remove all doubt, me so horny.
Click to expand...
ChesusRice said:
“I will speak until I can no longer speak,” Paul said as he began. “I will speak as long as it takes, until the alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our Constitution is important, that your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty by a court.”
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-03-06/politics/37497854_1_modern-filibuster-filibuster-end-debate

NO I ThINK HE WAS COMPLAINING ABOUT USING THEM ON US SOIL THAT WAS UNTIL YESTERDAY WHEN HE SAID WE COULD USE THEM TO BLOW UP A LIQOUR STORE ROBBERY SUSPECT

"I've never argued against any technology being used when you have an imminent threat, an active crime going on," Paul said. "If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and fifty dollars in cash. I don't care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him."
http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/04/23/ron_paul_fans_furious_over_rand_pauls_drone_flip_flop
Click to expand...
Whatever why dont you go Mcfuck yourself
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Balzac89 said:
Americans are killed on American soill by police everyday. Why does it matter if it is a gun or a missle?
Click to expand...
It's not he killing, we don't mind that. It is a matter of the Law.

Now,I myself, can shoot the perp coming out a liquor store firing his weapon. If I was in the store the rules are even more lax.

For a cop the rules are more strict. He has public safety and custody in mind for the perp, I don't. I have mind only for personal safety and the safety of others around. And I'm not wearing a vest. I'll shot first if I can't get close enough to club him.

So, if the drone is a cop's gun and the cop is operating the gun, the same rules apply. It doesn't matter if it's a drone or a 9mm handgun.

Now Paul stepped on his dick in public, the bane of politics. He linked in an orthogonal argument about robbery, that left him wide open....was it in response to a press question, he fell for?
 
Balzac89

Balzac89

Undercover Mod
Doer said:
It's not he killing, we don't mind that. It is a matter of the Law.

Now,I myself, can shoot the perp coming out a liquor store firing his weapon. If I was in the store the rules are even more lax.

For a cop the rules are more strict. He has public safety and custody in mind for the perp, I don't. I have mind only for personal safety and the safety of others around. And I'm not wearing a vest. I'll shot first if I can't get close enough to club him.

So, if the drone is a cop's gun and the cop is operating the gun, the same rules apply. It doesn't matter if it's a drone or a 9mm handgun.

Now Paul stepped on his dick in public, the bane of politics. He linked in an orthogonal argument about robbery, that left him wide open....was it in response to a press question, he fell for?
Click to expand...
Tell that to the police in Boston who fired wildly on suburban streets. They were lucky no one was killed.

What if we put guns on drones? Problem solved. lol
 
ricky1lung

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
I heard some bonehead the other day say the Privilege was not in the Constitution.

Fools. We have a very detailed Constitution, that grants rights to govt, not the other way, just get over it.

It's our Lord or the Flies Island and we run it ourselves. It ain't as easy as blame the King, I'll tell you that.
Click to expand...

WTF Doer....
You say this, and yet you argue the right to bear arms.
Do you even read what you post?
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
You seem to have a comprehension problem

this is consistent. What logic flaw?

exec privilege is in the C
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
You mean to tell me CNN took something a politician who does not share the current admin agenda, and took it out of context to make that person look like an idiot????


And Cheezusisfuckingdumb took the story and ran with it? totally believing everything he was just told by the same news agency that has been caught multiple times making shit up?

Nothing unusual about that.
Click to expand...
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
(CNN) - Some members of Sen. Rand Paul’s loyal group of Libertarian followers were outraged Tuesday after the Kentucky Republican said he would be fine with a drone strike killing an American citizen robbing a liquor store with a gun.
“We shouldn’t be willy-nilly, looking into their backyard at what they’re doing. But if there is a killer on the loose in a neighborhood, I’m not against drones being used to search them out, heat seeking devices being used,” Paul said in an interview on Fox Business Network.

“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and $50 in cash, I don’t care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him,” he added later.
Click to expand...
Consider the source, this is coming from a guy who still believes in perms..
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
The strange thing about politics is the more outrageous they are, the more love they get from their base.
Click to expand...
The outrageous award typically goes to the right wingers..but we have new contender, Anthony Weiner and his weiner..politics is THE single best reality show out there!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top