your favorite religious propaganda

His lame. cn

This to me is the most disgusting piece of religious propaganda ever created, i cant believe i forgot to mention it in my first post because i have been preaching my rhetoric against it since i saw Fight Club,


"In God We Trust" eh? So i am supposed to believe the supposed creator of all life on this planet who made all men equal, endorses money? The few pieces of worthless paper that are the difference between being shit on and being "the shit", the difference between having a home and living under a bridge in the middle of winter? I mean come on people does any one have common sense, it doesn't take much critical thinking to realize that it is a complete contradiction and should be removed from the dollar bill, and what ever happened to the separation between church and state? I don't believe in the christian god or any others in particular, and i don't mind religious people they can believe in what ever they want, what i cant stand is people who try and convert me specially when they are usually such fucking self righteous hypocrites, i understand that pretty much all of these people grew up with it and so they were conditioned to believe in it but they also grew up with Santa Clause and the tooth ferry and they don't believe in them any more.

Religion is a method of control that has been institutionalized upon almost all of us, if these people wanna waste there lives feeling guilty and being indentured to a life of servitude for there savior for no reason that's fine with me, morality is subjective and i choose to live my life knowing that if there is a god that gives a fuck about me, i don't have to accept Jesus into my heart, i will be in a better place because i am a reasonably good person.

And enough with the self righteousness already, "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing” ― Socrates

dont forget we even have the more subtle form of God indoctrination weve been exposed to ,just take a look at the old pledge of allegiance.

I didn't know they had changed it but yeah i remember it being that way when i was in elementary school i refused to do it.

rainman36 said:

But mines have to be the christian religion,that's classic shit right their,the whole hell thing,and burning for eternity,I'm like how? so if the physical body is flesh,bones,nerves and can be burned and feel pain right? so how can the soul feel anything,let alone burn for an eternity,how is that possible? and another thing is the pastors,and their big fancy churches,they know their wrong for what they are doing,bcuz if you are teaching the word of god,then you don't need a big church,fancy glass mirrors,to feel the spirit of god,learn to live the right way,and have to give up cash in the collection plate,what I'm saying is if the blind is leading the blind,then how and the fuck can we as a people get anywhere,and expect to go to heaven,when these people put money before the the word of god,bcuz if you aint giving up that cash,they damn sure as hell aint gonna be preaching shit,you think they are doing it bcuz they love it.

I believe in god,but I can't follow a religion,and I don't wanna offend anybody who may be a christian or whatever on this site,but you really have to ask yourself,is religion just another trap another way of control,and I said this before,if it was one true religion,then I think that it would be instilled in us from birth.If you know deep down that yopu are a good person,then you don't need to be stamped with a religion for it to be certified,and a preacher who sins trying to tell you how the fuck you need to live.only he without sin can tell me if my means justify my end.

Click to expand...

i actually asked a friend at work , who told me i was going to hell , how would i burn if i had no bones or flesh , and i was just a spirit, his answer was ( and he said it with sincerity ) 'the devil has a different kind of fire that can burn souls.'

see io thought this was gonna be actual religious propaganda,, not a bunch of whiney psuedo-atheists pissing about somebody not believing like you do.

this is how you post your favorite religious propaganda:

What's a pseudo-atheist?

mindphuk said:

What's a pseudo-atheist?

Click to expand...

atheists who adopt that stance because it's trendy, and ohh so very rebellious.

kind of like the 12 year old emo kid psuedo-anarchist numbskulls who think noam chomsky is a genius.

basically, twats.

Dr Kynes said:

atheists who adopt that stance because it's trendy, and ohh so very rebellious.

kind of like the 12 year old emo kid psuedo-anarchist numbskulls who think noam chomsky is a genius.

basically, twats.

Click to expand...

By what criteria can you distinguish a pseudo-atheist from the real deal? I would agree that atheism is trending, but not necessarily trendy.

mindphuk said:

By what criteria can you distinguish a pseudo-atheist from the real deal? I would agree that atheism is trending, but not necessarily trendy.

Click to expand...

just like in political theories, those who are unable to elucidate WHY they believe a particular way, and are unable to form a rational defense of their position are generally the poseurs and trend followers, the psuedo-_________ists.

an "anarchist" who cannot explain why anarchy would be a good thing is a psuedo-anarchist
an "atheist" who can only spout tired memes and weak ass quotes dot com bullshit is not really an atheist, he is simply adopting the beliefs of people who are actual atheists, thus placing his faith in the ideology of the "religion of atheism"
these atheist adherents follow the guidelines laid out by the high priests of their new faith, and follow the teachings of their gurus just like any religion. the irony is, the gurus arent trying to be gurus.

the worst kind of fake atheists though, are the part-time atheists. the ones who deride and assail every whispered rumor of christian encroachment on the pure and sacred "wall of separation" but express their admiration for islam, sikhism, sufism, buddhism, new age crystal worship, primitive fetishism, animism and pretty much any religion which is not the familiar christians and jews. they are opposed not to religious belief, but to religious beliefs which they view as conformist. they are halfassed satanists who are just too chicken to put on the mascara and pentagrams of the real deal douchenozzles who scream "LOOK AT ME! I'M REBELLING!" through the ear gauging, faux-tribal tatoos (seriously, WHAT TRIBE??) and elaborate hairstyles of the angsty teen stereotype.

Dr Kynes said:

just like in political theories, those who are unable to elucidate WHY they believe a particular way, and are unable to form a rational defense of their position are generally the poseurs and trend followers, the psuedo-_________ists.

an "anarchist" who cannot explain why anarchy would be a good thing is a psuedo-anarchist
an "atheist" who can only spout tired memes and weak ass quotes dot com bullshit is not really an atheist, he is simply adopting the beliefs of people who are actual atheists, thus placing his faith in the ideology of the "religion of atheism"
these atheist adherents follow the guidelines laid out by the high priests of their new faith, and follow the teachings of their gurus just like any religion. the irony is, the gurus arent trying to be gurus.

the worst kind of fake atheists though, are the part-time atheists. the ones who deride and assail every whispered rumor of christian encroachment on the pure and sacred "wall of separation" but express their admiration for islam, sikhism, sufism, buddhism, new age crystal worship, primitive fetishism, animism and pretty much any religion which is not the familiar christians and jews. they are opposed not to religious belief, but to religious beliefs which they view as conformist. they are halfassed satanists who are just too chicken to put on the mascara and pentagrams of the real deal douchenozzles who scream "LOOK AT ME! I'M REBELLING!" through the ear gauging, faux-tribal tatoos (seriously, WHAT TRIBE??) and elaborate hairstyles of the angsty teen stereotype.

Click to expand...

Well Fucking said, bravo sir, so poignant and clear! ^^^

Dr Kynes said:

just like in political theories, those who are unable to elucidate WHY they believe a particular way, and are unable to form a rational defense of their position are generally the poseurs and trend followers, the psuedo-_________ists.

an "anarchist" who cannot explain why anarchy would be a good thing is a psuedo-anarchist
an "atheist" who can only spout tired memes and weak ass quotes dot com bullshit is not really an atheist, he is simply adopting the beliefs of people who are actual atheists, thus placing his faith in the ideology of the "religion of atheism"
these atheist adherents follow the guidelines laid out by the high priests of their new faith, and follow the teachings of their gurus just like any religion. the irony is, the gurus arent trying to be gurus.

the worst kind of fake atheists though, are the part-time atheists. the ones who deride and assail every whispered rumor of christian encroachment on the pure and sacred "wall of separation" but express their admiration for islam, sikhism, sufism, buddhism, new age crystal worship, primitive fetishism, animism and pretty much any religion which is not the familiar christians and jews. they are opposed not to religious belief, but to religious beliefs which they view as conformist. they are halfassed satanists who are just too chicken to put on the mascara and pentagrams of the real deal douchenozzles who scream "LOOK AT ME! I'M REBELLING!" through the ear gauging, faux-tribal tatoos (seriously, WHAT TRIBE??) and elaborate hairstyles of the angsty teen stereotype.

Click to expand...

That last paragraph is so awesome I want to get it framed. I don't know why I detest the emo/goth people so much, some of the chicks are kinda hot though if you can get passed all the underlying issues they have (trust me I know, I've dated a couple).

edit: Rant- I guess I just hate the total lack of self esteem they have. Ever notice how they carry themselves? The majority of them are pale mother fuckers who hide at home in their dark bedroom and when they go in public they're hunched over. If you're going through all that trouble to stand out with your shitty make-up, dyed black hair, black elevator combat boots and all black clothing why are you trying to hide yourself when you're in public, you are obviously ashamed of yourself. I give some small respect to the ones who stand up straight and just enjoy the punk rock culture or whatever it is they like, just have some fucking self confidence. I see someone hunching over and my instincts start telling me to rip them apart. -End rant.

who doesnt like to snare a girl with daddy-issues?

[video=youtube;pP4aI18XODA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pP4aI18XODA[/video]

my favorite religious propaganda is the Saudi nonsense that pretends there is advanced science in the quran.

[video=youtube;is2x7QTZ8AI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=is2x7QTZ8AI#![/video]

It's our fault that kids get shot at school.

this one still cracks me up, Fundie logic is baffling.






a Creation Museum....

Heisenberg said:

[video=youtube;is2x7QTZ8AI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=is2x7QTZ8AI#![/video]

It's our fault that kids get shot at school.

Click to expand...

What a fucking douche bag,

1700s
The earliest known United States shooting to happen on school property was the Pontiac's Rebellion school massacre on July 26, 1764, where four Lenape American Indians entered the schoolhouse near present-day Greencastle, Pennsylvania, shot and killed schoolmaster Enoch Brown, and killed nine or ten children (reports vary). Only three children survived.[SUP][18][/SUP]


1800s

• November 2, 1853: Louisville, Kentucky A student, Matthew Ward, bought a self-cocking pistol in the morning, went to school and killed Schoolmaster Mr. Butler for excessively punishing his brother the day before. Even though he shot the Schoolmaster point blank in front of his classmates, he was acquitted.[SUP][19][/SUP]

• An April 30, 1866 editorial in the New York Times argued against students carrying pistols, citing "...pistols being dropped on the floor at balls or being exploded in very inconvenient ways. A boy of 12 has his pantaloons made with a pistol pocket; and this at a boarding-school filled with boys, who, we suppose, do or wish to do the same thing. We would advise parents to look into it, and learn whether shooting is to be a part of the scholastic course which may be practiced on their boys; or else we advise them to see that their own boys are properly armed with the most approved and deadly-pistol, and that there may be an equal chance at least of their shooting as of being shot."[SUP][20][/SUP]

• June 8, 1867: New York City At Public School No. 18, a 13 year old lad brought a pistol loaded and capped, without the knowledge of his parents or school-teachers, and shot and injured a classmate.[SUP][21][/SUP]

• December 22, 1868: Chattanooga, Tennessee A boy who refused to be whipped and left school, returned with his brother and a friend, the next day to seek revenge on his teacher. Not finding the teacher at the school, they continued to his house, where a gun battle rang out, leaving three dead. Only the brother survived.[SUP][22][/SUP]

• March 9, 1873: Salisbury, Maryland After school as Miss Shockley was walking with four small children, she was approached by a Mr. Hall and shot. The Schoolmaster ran out, but she was dead instantly. Hall threw himself under a train that night.[SUP][23][/SUP]

• May 24, 1879: Lancaster, New York As the carriage loaded with female students was pulling out of the school's stables, Frank Shugart, a telegraph operator, shot and severely injured Mr. Carr, Superintendent of the stables.[SUP][24][/SUP]

• March 6, 1884: Boston, Massachusetts As news of Jesse James reached the east coast, young kids started to act in the same manner. An article from the New York Times reads, Another "Jesse James" Gang - Word was brought to the Fifth Police Station to-night that a number of boys were using the Concord-street School-house for some unknown purpose, and a posse of officers was sent to investigate. The gang scattered at the approach of the police, and in their flight one drew a revolver and fired at Officer Rowan, without effect, however. William Nangle, age 14, and Sidney Duncan, age 12, were captured, but the other five or six escaped, among them the one who did the shooting. The boys refused to disclose the object of their meeting, but it is thought that another "Jesse James" organization has been broken up.[SUP][25][/SUP]

• March 15, 1884: Gainesville, Georgia In the middle of the day, a group of very drunk Jackson County farmers left the Jug Tavern drinking and shooting their revolvers as they headed down the street driving people into their homes. As they approached the female academy, the girls fled the schoolyard into the school where the gang followed swearing and shooting, firing several rounds into the front door. No one was hurt.[SUP][26][/SUP]

• July 4, 1886: Charleston, South Carolina During Sunday school, Emma Connelly shot and killed John Steedley for "circulating slanderous reports" about her, even though her brother publicly whipped him a few days earlier.[SUP][27][/SUP]

• June 12, 1887: Cleveland, Tennessee Will Guess went to the school and fatally shot Miss Irene Fann, his little sister's teacher, for whipping her the day before.[SUP][28][/SUP]

• June 13, 1889: New Brunswick, New Jersey Charles Crawford upset over an argument with a school Trustee, went up to the window and fired a pistol into a crowded school room. The bullet lodged in the wall just above the teacher's[SUP][vague][/SUP] head.[SUP][29][/SUP]

The first known mass shooting in the U.S. where students were shot, was on April 9, 1891, when 70 year old, James Foster fired a shotgun at a group of students in the playground of St. Mary's Parochial School, Newburgh, New York, causing minor injuries to several of the students.[SUP][30][/SUP] The majority of attacks during this time period by students on other students or teacher, usually involved stabbing with knives, or hitting with stones.

[video=youtube;6Qvo4_hMrF4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6Qvo4_hMrF4[/video]

Published on Dec 29, 2012
A Wahhabi religious cleric in Saudi Arabia, Muhammed al-Arifi, who is very influential in Jihadi circles, has recently issued a fatwa (religious edict) that permits all Jihadist militants in Syria to engage in short-lived marriages with Syrian women that each lasts for a few hours in order to satisfy their sexual desires and boost their determination in killing Syrians. He called the marriage as 'intercourse marriage'. It requires that the Syrian female be at least 14 years old, widowed, or divorced.

Dr Kynes said:

just like in political theories, those who are unable to elucidate WHY they believe a particular way, and are unable to form a rational defense of their position are generally the poseurs and trend followers, the psuedo-_________ists.

an "anarchist" who cannot explain why anarchy would be a good thing is a psuedo-anarchist
an "atheist" who can only spout tired memes and weak ass quotes dot com bullshit is not really an atheist, he is simply adopting the beliefs of people who are actual atheists, thus placing his faith in the ideology of the "religion of atheism"
these atheist adherents follow the guidelines laid out by the high priests of their new faith, and follow the teachings of their gurus just like any religion. the irony is, the gurus arent trying to be gurus.

Click to expand...

Who are you to define the meaning of being an atheist?
Being an atheist don't require anything from you. It's just the label we have put on people who don't believe in a god. The only defense anyone need for being atheist is "I don't believe it because I don't see enough evidence to do so", nothing more. Your whole idea of psyuedo-atheists are, sorry to say, retarded.