Why don't you like Ron Paul?

Parker

Well-Known Member
looks like you are using lies and strawmen to ease the pain of cognitive dissonance in your little brainwashed mind.
You aren't man enough to admit your candidates policies stink. So instead troll and lie about other candidates. Why listen to you, you're wrong too often and display all the logic and reason of a 6 year old. Cousins shouldn't marry. Its not your fault really.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
It is, look it up. The morning after pill is an abortifacient. It will force a woman's body to flush out even a fertilized egg (zygote) before it attaches to the uteran wall. It's a very early stage chemical abortion.
You have described what the pill does but technically you dont know if there is actually an egg much less a fertilized one.
 

kelly4

Well-Known Member
but don't distort facts and say that you are quoting me.
That should ONLY be done by the pros.....the liberals.

Wow, sounds exactly like what I told YOU a couple weeks ago.

Once again Abandon says, "Do as I say, not as I do." LOL! I love me a hypocrite!

I wonder what the response will be?........I hope I didn't make a spelling error!:lol:
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
You have described what the pill does but technically you dont know if there is actually an egg much less a fertilized one.
Who will buy this wonderful feeling? I'm so high, I swear I could fly. Me oh my, I don't want to lose it.

Where is the man with all the money? He's cheap at half the price.

Somehow I'll be strong, as long as he needs me.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
You are incorrect, Re-read my post as you completely missed the point.
"You confuse Ron Pauls beliefs with Ron Pauls duty as an elected official.

Wanting the state to decide instead of the Federal government has nothing to do with his personal beliefs on the topic of abortion. It has everything to do with the topic of the role of the Federal government.
No, you are wrong and you don't know what your candidate's policies are. I bet you assume to know who I am going to vote for too. Ron Paul wants unborn children protected constitutionally. He opposes Roe vs. Wade. It has everything to do with his personal beliefs. He is an obstetrician so he thinks he knows more than everyone else.
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
I was a young adult when MTV first aired. I have to admit I got kind of hooked on the big hair bands videos because they had the skankiest hottest women in them.

This was before the days of Internet porn.

What ever happened to MTV it use to play music, sigh .... now its pregnant 14-year olds, and Jersy shore cornballs
 

InCognition

Active Member
People against Ron Paul:

  • Want something for free
  • Think that life is fair (refer to bullet #1: getting things for free makes life more "fair")
  • Think that it's ethical to obligate others to work for someone else (refer to bullet #2: life is fair, even if you have to extort/rob people to make it fair)
  • Don't understand basic math (cannot/refuse to understand basic economics or monetary policy)
  • Can't read their native language (the constitution is written in English)
  • Don't understand natural rights and/or unalienable rights (refer to bullet #5)
  • Don't understand the first amendment
  • Don't understand property rights
  • Think statutes are lawful even if they violate an amendment (cannot/refuse to acknowledge that laws aren't just, if they break an amendment)
  • Manipulate the adherence to the constitution, into a form of radicalism
  • Trolls (those that know he makes sense, but just don't want to acknowledge it, thus they spew hatred towards those with a logical thought process - ignorance causes this)

Now that about sums it up. Anyone who is against Ron Paul likely falls under at least one, of the above categories, in regards to their specific disagreement(s). If one falls under one of the above categories, it's not so much a result of one's disagreement, rather it's a result of ignorance that causes the disagreement to begin with. It's pretty simple.

Following a written law (constitution) doesn't leave room for ignorance, and that is all Ron Paul wants to do. The other candidates want to do everything in their power to test written law, which is ignorant. That's pretty simple too.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
People against Ron Paul:

  • Want something for free
  • Think that life is fair (refer to bullet #1: getting things for free makes life more "fair")
  • Think that it's ethical to obligate others to work for someone else (refer to bullet #2: life is fair, even if you have to extort/rob people to make it fair)
  • Don't understand basic math (cannot/refuse to understand basic economics or monetary policy)
  • Can't read their native language (the constitution is written in English)
  • Don't understand natural rights and/or unalienable rights (refer to bullet #5)
  • Don't understand the first amendment
  • Don't understand property rights
  • Think statutes are lawful even if they violate an amendment (cannot/refuse to acknowledge that laws aren't just, if they break an amendment)
  • Manipulate the adherence to the constitution, into a form of radicalism
  • Trolls (those that know he makes sense, but just don't want to acknowledge it, thus they spew hatred towards those with a logical thought process - ignorance causes this)

Now that about sums it up. Anyone who is against Ron Paul likely falls under at least one, of the above categories, in regards to their specific disagreement(s). If one falls under one of the above categories, it's not so much a result of one's disagreement, rather it's a result of ignorance that causes the disagreement to begin with. It's pretty simple.
cult members often like to put the "non-believers" into categories.

:clap:
 

mccumcumber

Well-Known Member
People against Ron Paul:

  • Want something for free
  • Think that life is fair (refer to bullet #1: getting things for free makes life more "fair")
  • Think that it's ethical to obligate others to work for someone else (refer to bullet #2: life is fair, even if you have to extort/rob people to make it fair)
  • Don't understand basic math (cannot/refuse to understand basic economics or monetary policy)
  • Can't read their native language (the constitution is written in English)
  • Don't understand natural rights and/or unalienable rights (refer to bullet #5)
  • Don't understand the first amendment
  • Don't understand property rights
  • Think statutes are lawful even if they violate an amendment (cannot/refuse to acknowledge that laws aren't just, if they break an amendment)
  • Manipulate the adherence to the constitution, into a form of radicalism
  • Trolls (those that know he makes sense, but just don't want to acknowledge it, thus they spew hatred towards those with a logical thought process - ignorance causes this)

Now that about sums it up. Anyone who is against Ron Paul likely falls under at least one, of the above categories, in regards to their specific disagreement(s). If one falls under one of the above categories, it's not so much a result of one's disagreement, rather it's a result of ignorance that causes the disagreement to begin with. It's pretty simple.

Following a written law (constitution) doesn't leave room for ignorance, and that is all Ron Paul wants to do. The other candidates want to do everything in their power to test written law, which is ignorant. That's pretty simple too.
I don't really think I fit into any of your categories, nor do I think you understand what mathematics/logic is. Though Econ relies on "math" (if you've taken discrete mathematics or any higher course, specifically number and game theory, it's pretty easy to understand that stating Econ=Math is a bunch of bullshit), it's not really a math. Human's patterns can be estimated by algorithms, which in turn dictate some basic "rules" in Econ. However, if you really want to delve into this field you ought to take a programming/cog sci/mathematics graduate level class, not an econ class.

It annoys me how pompous most Ron Paul fans are. They criticize liberals by saying they're pseudo intellectuals, but the phrase: "Point one finger at me, you're pointing four at yourself" really applies here. I think everyone can agree that politicians are corrupt. I don't think Ron Paul is the answer. I've been a Nader (who, by the way, commends Ron Paul on his honesty and thinks he brings up some good issues) fan my entire voting career, and if I could, I would have voted for Frank Zappa in '92. More often than not, rage and calling everyone a dipshit who doesn't agree with you will not motivate people to agree with your political opinion. In fact it will motivate them to find reasons to call you a dipshit, which you gave plenty.

I've already stated my reason for disliking Ron Paul, and again, I do not think it follows your anti paul guidelines. Understand that peoples' opinions differ, and instead of offering groups and guidelines and stating them in a "matter of fact" attitude; offer them some issues that you would like to discuss and debate. What's the point in making 20k+ Ron Paul threads if the same message reiterates throughout all of them: "Ron Paul is the best, if you don't think so you're dumb, I'm smarter than you, you're a dumbass." I think I'm actually giving people too much credit by using "you're" correctly, but we'll ignore that. In short, don't present people with something as condescending as your post AND expect them to take you seriously.
 

FilthyFletch

Mr I Can Do That For Half
Because he is a crazy liberal who doesn't understand basic reality. To believe you do not a strong military with bases around the world for first response is just nuts. To even think legalizing all drugs is a good idea makes him a looney basterd with no concept. Yes big government like Obama and dems like is bad and he wants less but he wants to basically turn the country into hippy land which leaves us way to open. He will give you 5 minutes of clarity then he goes off to looney land for the next 50 minutes. He claims to be republican but is actually a liberal with small government wants.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So you just categorized me as a "cult member"? By your definition that would make you a cult member as well. Welcome to the club.

What's wrong with being a cult member?
i can't be in your ron paul cult, i'm a non-believer who does not worship at the altar of paul.
 
Top