lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
your edit does not fix your contradiction, it only leads us to see that the same damn thing probably happened in iowa.
you tried to omit part of the truth by leaving out the part where ron paul won that caucus, which is not telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. i assume that if you have to lie to me just to get my attention, everything else you say is steer manure.
i am kind of offended at this insult to intelligence, you trying to mislead us by omitting the truth.
This is the problem that I have with these forums, people nitpicking at the wording people use instead of addressing the issue. The Nevada caucus was suspicious IMO for the following reasons:
-Ron Paul's numbers didn't substantially grow like EVERY other caucus/primary we have had so far
- Gingrich's multi-million dollar supporter (Adelson) held a late night caucus on his property and limited entrance to those of a certain religious affiliation.
- People voted for Gingrich
- The number of precincts kept changing w/o explanation
- The only recorded caucus that I have seen, Ron Paul won by a huge margin.
- The results weren't reported until Sunday night.
- A recount was issued w/o the release of original tallies.
- The turnout was significantly low
- The winner was claimed without majority of the populous count, Clark County wasn't even included.
- Certain precincts were thrown out
- Different sources all reported different results.
- The percentage counted went backwards on several occasions.
That is all I can think of, that was a shady caucus if you watched it.