Why do we feed, water, water with soil?

It seems to be generally accepted that plants being fed in soil should follow a schedule similar to this. Water with nutrients, then just water a couple times. We dont do this in coco or hydro, rather we give a steady consistent amount of nutrients that the plant is happy at. So why in soil? Would the plant not be just as happy or happier if given a steady feed every watering at lower amount? lets say normally you give 900ppm, then just straight water twice. Why not split it evenly into 300ppm every watering and be feeding them exactly the same amount? Those numbers are just an example, important part is just feeding at 1/3 strength every watering rather than feed, water, water. Is there an actual reason why they prefer a varying concentration? I dont see why hydro should be any different.

its not different. whoever told you to feed water water doesnt know what they're talking about. lighter feed every irrigation cycle is the better method, 420%.

I don't. I feed, feed, feed. I never just water unless the plant shows signs of nute burn or lock out.

in which case you should flush the medium with 3x the volume of water, and come in with a lower feed.. never just plain water.

DeGreenster said:

its not different. whoever told you to feed water water doesnt know what they're talking about. lighter feed every irrigation cycle is the better method, 420%.

Click to expand...

Really? For starters straight from the instructions on multiple nutrient brands, i literally see it all the time in posts, videos, grow journals, etc. You act like you've never even heard it before. Search feed, water water on google and read a couple threads of it being discussed. Literally like 90% of people recommend straight water between feedings

It's one of those bullshit bro-science things. good nutrient systems are made to be used with every fertigation. I've grown a lot of plants, with many different nutrient lines.. I always water in nutrients ..... always.

There is. however, an argument for water only during the last 2 weeks of flower. NOT for the purpose of flushing, but because your plant will finish the same with or without nutrients at that point, so you may as well save the money.. I myself still give nutes during those 2 weeks, cause i'd rather not shoot myself in the foot at the very end of such a long time period. There have been tests done though, and biomass is identical with or without feed during the last 2 weeks.

Coco/Hydro are typically grown in small pots, using less medium and plants are able to consume the available nutrients quickly.

Soil is typically grown in much larger containers, so it takes plants a longer time to consume the available nutrients and you are mostly just wasting nutrients by feeding it with every watering.

Its really best to just observe your plants and respond to their needs, instead of seeking a "one-size-fits-all" answer off a forum that have no idea about your setup.

waterproof808 said:

Soil is typically grown in much larger containers, so it takes plants a longer time to consume the available nutrients and you are mostly just wasting nutrients by feeding it with every watering.

Click to expand...

that's not true. you feed every watering for the same reason it's better to change out the rez instead of topping it off with fresh water. you keep your soil mineralization properly balanced. if you only add water, you're depleting whichever nutrient the plants using the most of.

Man people need to wake up to actual terminology. Hydro is wet, duh. And soil is but better medium when properly fed. Show me you are smarter than mother nature.

DeGreenster said:

It's one of those bullshit bro-science things. good nutrient systems are made to be used with every fertigation. I've grown a lot of plants, with many different nutrient lines.. I always water in nutrients ..... always.

There is. however, an argument for water only during the last 2 weeks of flower. NOT for the purpose of flushing, but because your plant will finish the same with or without nutrients at that point, so you may as well save the money.. I myself still give nutes during those 2 weeks, cause i'd rather not shoot myself in the foot at the very end of such a long time period. There have been tests done though, and biomass is identical with or without feed during the last 2 weeks.

Click to expand...

Well logically i would agree with you and see no reason why not to feed the correct amount every feeding, i was just curious why it seems to be such a common recommendation. There must be some kind of reasoning behind it.

As for no feed last 2 weeks, im familiar with the studies. As im sure you know it was mostly to disprove the myth that plants need starved near harvest to "use up excess nutes" to prevent them being left in the plant and consumed when smoked. I also feed to the end. Nutrients are relatively cheap vs the yeild you could lose by under feeding at the end.

“We” dont

waterproof808 said:

Coco/Hydro are typically grown in small pots, using less medium and plants are able to consume the available nutrients quickly.

Soil is typically grown in much larger containers, so it takes plants a longer time to consume the available nutrients and you are mostly just wasting nutrients by feeding it with every watering.

Its really best to just observe your plants and respond to their needs, instead of seeking a "one-size-fits-all" answer off a forum that have no idea about your setup.

Click to expand...

I still dont see the logic. Yes, you should read your plants and feed what they ask for, but why in an on/off schedule? Container size is irrelevant. If soil grows use larger container that hold more nutrients, then drop the ppm to match what the plant is consuming. Why alternate feed and water? If the plant shows its getting too much, drop the ppm of the solution you are feeding with every water. What am i missing?

DWCgrower406 said:

I still dont see the logic. Yes, you should read your plants and feed what they ask for, but why in an on/off schedule? Container size is irrelevant. If soil grows use larger container that hold more nutrients, then drop the ppm to match what the plant is consuming. Why alternate feed and water? If the plant shows its getting too much, drop the ppm of the solution you are feeding with every water. What am i missing?

Click to expand...

Learn to read your plants and they will only beg until granting your fantasy.

MICHI-CAN said:

Man people need to wake up to actual terminology. Hydro is wet, duh. And soil is but better medium when properly fed. Show me you are smarter than mother nature.

Click to expand...

What?

MICHI-CAN said:

Learn to read your plants and they will only beg until granting your fantasy.

Click to expand...

And again, what?

DWCgrower406 said:

Really? For starters straight from the instructions on multiple nutrient brands, i literally see it all the time in posts, videos, grow journals, etc. You act like you've never even heard it before. Search feed, water water on google and read a couple threads of it being discussed. Literally like 90% of people recommend straight water between feedings

Click to expand...

You watch YouTube growers don’t you?

DWCgrower406 said:

What?

Click to expand...

Water. And our views aren't natural. LOL.

bk78 said:

You watch YouTube growers don’t you?

Click to expand...

Wow, ok buddy. As i already said, its everywhere. Bottles of nutrients, many threads, grow journals, etc. Are you gonna tell me right now that there isnt highly skilled growers out there that follow a similar schedule?
Sorry you didnt like the word "we", obviously not you and the concept doesnt make sense to me either, but dont act like you've never heard it before.

MICHI-CAN said:

Water. And our views aren't natural. LOL. View attachment 4967280

Click to expand...

I still have no idea what you're talking about

DWCgrower406 said:

I still have no idea what you're talking about

Click to expand...

We assume omnipotence. Humans are ignorant and vane. Just help nature. Hydro falls short if not a lab.