Which is the most valuable to protect?

What needs the most protection?

  • Money

  • Politicians

  • Children

  • Jewelry

Results are only viewable after voting.
A

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
Bad metaphor.

You’re not a cop. You’re trying to bring an argument, which is the daily bread of the academic world.
In that world, anywhere on the globe, you reference all your premises in the peer-reviewed periodical literature. Each discipline has its handful of trusted publications.

It is your duty to bring references to known-good links.
Failure to fully reference is a peremptory total concession of the argument.
Similarly, using nonacademic links. I am always surprised when posters imagine a video has any reference value.

There are rules.

You’re pretty badly on the hind foot in terms of cleanliness of work. You’re not showing the appropriate loss of attitude.
Click to expand...
Correct, I'm not the cop. I'm the turnip picker. The cop claims to have a source that says I can't pick turnips and I am asking to see the relevant verbiage in the entire source..

The trusted publications in this case would be all the current legislation on the books or in the works, which is also on the books or it's not "in the works" since Roe was overturned.

Which was presented as an article and linked to back a claim.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
ActionianJacksonian said:
Correct, I'm not the cop. I'm the turnip picker. The cop claims to have a source that says I can't pick turnips and I am asking to see the relevant verbiage in the entire source..

The trusted publications in this case would be all the current legislation on the books or in the works, which is also on the books or it's not "in the works" since Roe was overturned.

Which was presented as an article and linked to back a claim.
Click to expand...
in which case, it is your job to link to the relevant page.

Defining the trusted information space is not the same as linking to the meat of the matter.

You continue to violently distort the rules of argument, which is expected from a shape-guarding troll.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
ActionianJacksonian said:
That's not how any of this works. Here's what you said pages ago.



Nothing. We have a right to travel freely and unmolested. You can go smoke weed in some states, fuck a prostitute in others and face no consequences when you return. You are trying to muddy the waters with murder, and that's exactly the reason I am betting you can't highlight an example.

Now, find in your article of current and proposed legislation where this is or may be the case. Please include the extradition.
Click to expand...
Look up the law yourself, it was a newspaper article and most of it concerned with proposed laws. They already tried to charge a woman with murder over abortion in Texas FFS.
 
shimbob

shimbob

Well-Known Member
ActionianJacksonian said:
In Ohio, this example is under the exception. So the story is bogus either way you want to look at it, ad there was no need to seek care out of state. The larger issue is of course to sew seeds of division, and it seems to be working well.
Click to expand...
www.indystar.com

Ohio man charged in rape of 10-year-old that led to Indiana abortion

Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis OB-GYN, told IndyStar a 10-year-old came to Indiana for abortion access. A man was charged in Franklin County court.
www.indystar.com
 
A

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
in which case, it is your job to link to the relevant page.

Defining the trusted information space is not the same as linking to the meat of the matter.

You continue to violently distort the rules of argument, which is expected from a shape-guarding troll.
Click to expand...
The relevant link was already posted by the one obliged to do so. It already happened. In the opposite way your saying it should have. Because you have it backwards.

I claimed the sky is red.

You say no its not

I post an article proving it

You notice there's no proof in it

You ask where the proof is in the article

Person C chimes in and says the burden of proof is on you because that's the rules of argument.

You are Person C.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
ActionianJacksonian said:
The relevant link was already posted by the one obliged to do so. It already happened. In the opposite way your saying it should have. Because you have it backwards.

I claimed the sky is red.

You say no its not

I post an article proving it

You notice there's no proof in it

You ask where the proof is in the article

Person C chimes in and says the burden of proof is on you because that's the rules of argument.

You are Person C.
Click to expand...
If you mean where you say a flintlock is not a firearm, your opinion here is suitably weighted.
 
A

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
shimbob said:
www.indystar.com

Ohio man charged in rape of 10-year-old that led to Indiana abortion

Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis OB-GYN, told IndyStar a 10-year-old came to Indiana for abortion access. A man was charged in Franklin County court.
www.indystar.com
Click to expand...
And it still falls under Ohio exception "serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function."

Any Ohio doctor who would not perform that procedure should be prosecuted for malpractice.

And Biden still lied saying she had to go out of state.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
ActionianJacksonian said:
And it still falls under Ohio exception "serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function."

Any Ohio doctor who would not perform that procedure should be prosecuted for malpractice.

And Biden still lied saying she had to go out of state.
Click to expand...
I think he read the papers like everybody else, republicans were denying it until the rapist was busted. Good for Ohio, some places make no exceptions or will when they pass the laws, or amend existing ones.

1657759528181.png
 
A

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
If you mean where you say a flintlock is not a firearm, your opinion here is suitably weighted.
Click to expand...
It's exactly the same as that time. In the firearms act, a flintlock is not a firearm. The person I was talking to knew what we were talking about and gave me an opinion on it. The even mentioned the firearms act so there was no need to link it.

Then you linked it anyway in a strange "get off my lawn" moment just like now.

You interjected about something already agreed upon as evidenced by the conversation moving forward without a hitch about the nuance you were nit picking because it wasn't yet linked, but named and so it was understood.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
ActionianJacksonian said:
It's exactly the same as that time. In the firearms act, a flintlock is not a firearm. The person I was talking to knew what we were talking about and gave me an opinion on it. The even mentioned the firearms act so there was no need to link it.

Then you linked it anyway in a strange "get off my lawn" moment just like now.

You interjected about something already agreed upon as evidenced by the conversation moving forward without a hitch about the nuance you were nit picking because it wasn't yet linked, but named and so it was understood.
Click to expand...
But what I linked proves that it is a firearm.
 
A

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED said:
I think he read the papers like everybody else, republicans were denying it until the rapist was busted. Good for Ohio, some places make no exceptions or will when they pass the laws, or amend existing ones.

View attachment 5162998
Click to expand...
I buy that. That he read the papers like everyone else. It's not like the president can't say any thing that's false. Trump did enough of that for at least a generation though so people are a little more sensitive to it.
 
A

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
]
cannabineer said:
But what I linked proves that it is a firearm.
Click to expand...
Ok I agree your link says that.
That a flintlock is a firearm that is classed as "antique firearm" and falls out of the scope of "firearm".

I concede that this link of yours is unequivocal proof that a flintlock is a firearm, to anyone but the ATF.
 
injinji

injinji

Well-Known Member
bam0813 said:
We no longer have press. We have bought and payed for partisan channels for both parties. Pick one and enjoy your personal kind of propaganda regardless of party. Just like how your convinced from across an ocean that its not easy to vote here.
how is it that twenty news channels all repeat, verbatim, the exact same script word for word in many cases.Especially those “ key” phrases we all know and love. Only one way, entirely scripted
Click to expand...
While it it free for viewing on yt or your local pbs channel, it is paid for by the viewers, so they are the special interest group that has to be pleased. You do not have to watch click driven news. I haven't looked at fox, cnn or msnbc in years.

 
injinji

injinji

Well-Known Member
bam0813 said:
Everyone screaming for fact checking but do none.
need examples, the horrible story that everyone was rightfully outraged about you know the ten yr old who was raped and had to travel to a dif state for abortion? Media ate it up. Even the president told the story. Guess what turns out thats a completely fabricated story too…..anything to trigger and divide
Click to expand...
Bro, you need to take a good hard look at the people you are listening to. Maybe ask yourself why they are lying to you. And now that you know they are lying to you, are you going to change your sources of information?
 
injinji

injinji

Well-Known Member
bam0813 said:
The bottom line is we don't know if the story was true or false, the author did not use standard journalistic practices of confirming with more than one source

And why do you think that is? Maybe because these authors and journalists are really neither. I know if i don’t follow standard practices at my job i wont have one
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top