BudMcLovin
Active Member
Before I get going in to many directions here heres the point of my post. Im sure I have misconceptions about liberals, conservatives, those in the middle and even crazy libertarians like myself. (please lets keep this civil I want to try to understand and compare each others beliefs and opinions)
I think I finally understand why liberals think the way they do. They see society, as a whole, more important than the individual for the most part. Thats why they think its ok for the government to mandate all sorts of laws and regulations that control the individual to behave the way the liberals deems appropriate. Like in the case of the Arizona shooter they see not only the shooter as responsible but all those who do not see the world through their world view.
Conservatives on the other hand see the individual more so than liberals but they to want to use the government to force people live a moral life. No weed or butt love for the people.
Im more of a libertarian. So I try to as Neil Boortz likes to default to freedom. So heres what I think: The government should stay out of the way as much as possible. We dont need a bunch of bullshit laws, all we need is common sense laws. For example why cant destruction of public and private property laws apply to environmental damages instead of creating big bureaucracies to control and police every aspect of business. I believe unions used to play the role of the labor board and OSHA giving the worker a way to confront dangerous and unjust situations but today they dont.
So what do you think about my assumptions?
What and why do you think about:
Which is more important to the survival of our republic/democracy the individual or society? Why?
How far can government in controlling the daily life of Americans?
How much freedom is too much?
Sorry for the long post. Ive been snowed in for 3 days stoned and rambling. Again please lets keep this civil and try to understand the basic differences in our opinions and ideas.
I think I finally understand why liberals think the way they do. They see society, as a whole, more important than the individual for the most part. Thats why they think its ok for the government to mandate all sorts of laws and regulations that control the individual to behave the way the liberals deems appropriate. Like in the case of the Arizona shooter they see not only the shooter as responsible but all those who do not see the world through their world view.
Conservatives on the other hand see the individual more so than liberals but they to want to use the government to force people live a moral life. No weed or butt love for the people.
Im more of a libertarian. So I try to as Neil Boortz likes to default to freedom. So heres what I think: The government should stay out of the way as much as possible. We dont need a bunch of bullshit laws, all we need is common sense laws. For example why cant destruction of public and private property laws apply to environmental damages instead of creating big bureaucracies to control and police every aspect of business. I believe unions used to play the role of the labor board and OSHA giving the worker a way to confront dangerous and unjust situations but today they dont.
So what do you think about my assumptions?
What and why do you think about:
Which is more important to the survival of our republic/democracy the individual or society? Why?
How far can government in controlling the daily life of Americans?
How much freedom is too much?
Sorry for the long post. Ive been snowed in for 3 days stoned and rambling. Again please lets keep this civil and try to understand the basic differences in our opinions and ideas.