You're reaching a little.
Thats really only feasible with hydro and some people like their dirt not to mention how many people have a 25 ft room in there house? This is all nonsense and if the bill would give more rights to citizens it would probably get passed.
25 sqft is 25 sq ft, it doesn't matter about the dimensions it would still contain the same area. Also, how would you keep clones if you could only have the one area. This bill sets up big business to profit off of you in some way or another. Whether it's buying from them because the taxes on personal grows are too high or your buying their clones because of space limitations otherwise you're growing from seed every time. Hell, allowing taxation of personal grows is reason enough to vote no. .
Guess what? 19 does NOT allow taxation for personal grow, show me where in the prop it "allows" for this please.
how can they possibly tax what you grow at home on your property with your seeds on and your dirt? they can't it is impossible and not the intention of prop 19....AT ALL.
you don't need a permit to grow tomatoes and you will NOT need one to grow marijuana when 19 passes.
As for the grow space, it does not define that it has to be confined to one area. you can have plants out side in a 15 sq ft plot and a mother/clones/whatever inside in 10 sq ft plot. or just a room with a closet, or 2 indoor closets, the possibilities are endless...
you are reaching at straws, all of your arguments against 19 are invalid and unsupported.
also medical growers are recommended to grow under 12 plants, people vs kelley was not definitive enough to protect a limitless amount of plants for medical growers, a 5 x 5 feet space is capable of containing WAY more than 12 plants....
It doesn't protect against it either show me where it say personal grows can't be taxed. The government isn't a fan of this legalization the people are and the government will try and get as much money as possible out of it. A lot of the problems with this bill is what it doesn't cover and what protections it doesn't offer.
Splitting up your grow isn't any better if anything it would be more restrictive. No matter how you divide it up it's still 25 sq ft and the possibilities aren't endless.
1. It depends on where you live and the county's guidelines.
2. Your full of shit if you think you can fit over 12 mature marijuana plants in a 5x5 area unless your flowering clones and they better not be sativas.
That is purely misinformation.
Read this article and then refute RC's ordinance.
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/08/29/2990210/rancho-cordova-asking-voters-to.html
That is purely misinformation.
Read this article and then refute RC's ordinance.
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/08/29/2990210/rancho-cordova-asking-voters-to.html
oh great a tax that doesn't even exist, that's helpful to this discussion....NOT!
how can such a tax even be enforced? it can't!
sorry but your lame attempt to refute all of the VALID information in my post is a FAIL!
Every red neck or Mormon dominated city(there are a BUNCH of them) in California will jump on the precedent. This will render quite a few cities with nothing but ridiculously punitive laws governing Cannabis.
If P19 were to pass, I'd be willing to bet that some Californians would have to drive 100 miles to score a "legal" bag.
If P19 were to pass, I'd be willing to bet that some Californians would have to drive 100 miles to score a "legal" bag.
its pretty easy to speculate which cities will allow sales and which ones will restrict it. 19 is so similar to 215 that the cities that have already drafted ordinances for 215 will most likely continue to allow/or not recreational marijuana depending on what they have ALREADY decided.
the great part about this that we have learned over the past years of operating within these specifications under 215 is that delivery services are the solution to jurisdictions that do not allow sales.
i live in a county that banned medical sales, however anytime i need weed i just call a delivery service from the neighboring county, never even have to leave home!
Exactly.
A recommendation is far more protection from bad government and bad laws than P19.
My son got his at 18.
He has severe back problems(scoliosis).
$100 annually is far better protection than the unknown effects of the " Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010".(Better known as P19)
There's something to be said for that. But, I wonder what would happen to the delivery driver if he were caught "dealing" where it is illegal?
It really just depends on how idiotic they want to get. I've seen some really bad local governments.
dude you make it sound like your whole family is fucked up.