Was jesus real?

shnkrmn

Well-Known Member
A possible mechanism for evolution may be seen in the changing of frequency of expression of a genetic trait in response to environment over a period of time. This occurs in populations, not individuals. It has been a long time since I studied it, but I recall that one of the earliest observations of such a change in genetic expression was seen in a species of moth in England in the 19th century. This moth depended for survival on the camouflaging pattern and coloration of its wings allowing it to blend into tree bark in order to avoid being noticed by predators. In heavily industrialized parts of England,, where coal dust began to darken foliage and bark of trees, the population of such moths assumed, over time, a darker appearance as the phenotype of that moth which was darker was more successful at avoiding predators and thus was more successful at surviving to reproduce. This is an example of species adapatation. Note that this did not result in speciation, the light and dark moths were still the same species, but given enough time it was thought that the two populations might eventually become genetically differentiated enough that they would no longer breed together, leading to further differentiation and eventually an inability to interbreed; voila: two species where one was before. Because this happened in a relatively brief period of time, this is a poor example of 'evolution' but could illustrate one of the mechanisms by which one species can give rise to another.

Add in random mutation, isolation of populations such as the many species of finches which Darwin observed on the Galapagos islands and longer term forces such as the tectonic movement of continents, large scale global catastrophes such as asteroid impacts and you have a powerful recipe for diversification of life forms.
 

shnkrmn

Well-Known Member
Well, maybe if they evolved propellers on their noses!:mrgreen: Nope, even then they wouldn't have enough lift from their wings.
 

mexiblunt

Well-Known Member
I know that stuff.:mrgreen: I like the prop idea. maybe they will evolve to use thier gas for rocket power, then they wont need as much lift.

But still. why the wings? I know penguins kinda "fly" under water. but I don't ostriches flying under ground.lol.
 

email468

Well-Known Member
I know that stuff.:mrgreen: I like the prop idea. maybe they will evolve to use thier gas for rocket power, then they wont need as much lift.

But still. why the wings? I know penguins kinda "fly" under water. but I don't ostriches flying under ground.lol.
ostriches do use their wings to keep cool. but the feathers all wispy and even if they didn't weigh so much, ostriches still wouldn't get off the ground with those wings. They are good for regulating the bird's temperature and we don't know what else. Or I should say, I don't know what else.
 

shnkrmn

Well-Known Member
I think ostriches use them for balance when they run too. 40 MPH. God thing they aren't man eaters.
 

mexiblunt

Well-Known Member
Ok I think we are officialy starting to hijack Bobharvey thread. Ima cut it out for bit on this one. I know it's part of the evolution thing but not. Is jesus real?:joint:
 

Hydrotech364

Well-Known Member
well lets say you jaam fifteen pounds of solid rocket fuel up a penguins ass,then shoved the penguin up the ostrich's ass,,,,lit the fuse ,,then they'd be airpooling.

better living through chemistry and high explosives
 
Top