TRUMPS BANNED AD

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
When you're responsible for inflicting 85% of all German casualties and at the same time take over 90% of all casualties in the European conflict, you earn the right to say whatever you want, especially to those who think showing up 3 years later, inflicted less than 3% of all casualties somehow equates to doing all of the hard work and saving the day.

The only thing the U.S. saved in Europe was the German, Italian, French and Polish languages.
I'll be sure to mention that to my dead uncle's grave.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
First off, dipshit, that's a loaded question. We're talking about the Nazi's, not the Axis powers as a whole.

Germany was already finished as an effective army LONG before we ever got a fucking foot on the European continent. By June the 6th, 1944, the Russian's had already decimated the German army. The entire third army (some half a million of Germany's best troops and most of it's heavy armor) surrendered at Stalingrad in February of 1943.

After that, the German's were on the run the ENTIRE TIME. In fact, only once more would they even dare put on an offensive, and when they did they kicked our ass clear to fucking Mars. Had they not run out of gas, we'd have been pushed back into the fucking ocean.

We landed in Northern France on June 6th, 1944 and in Sicily almost exactly one year earlier. By the time we even got involved it was already over in Europe. It was only a matter of time before Russia took it all.

In fact, that's the only reason we even bothered going: to make sure Russia didn't take it all.

Now as far as Japan goes, yeah. We did a lot of the heavy lifting there, but nowhere near all of it. You're the typical moron that thinks sitting on your ass while everybody else works the field busting their butts and then you come in and help pick that last row of tomatoes somehow equates to you picking that entire harvest all by yourself.

You're flat out fucking wrong. We didn't kill anywhere NEAR the amount of Germans the Russians did. We really, other than carpet bombing the fuck out of innocent civilians, didn't accomplish jack shit in the European theater other than keeping England and other allies supplied with gas, oil and food and military equipment.
We should have turned General Patton loose on the russians at the end of WWII...
 
Last edited:

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
We should have turned General Patton lose on the russians at the end of WWII...
Well, they should have turned him loose earlier than that. Had we met the Russians on the other side of the Danube river, the cold war probably never happens.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
When you're responsible for inflicting 85% of all German casualties and at the same time take over 90% of all casualties in the European conflict, you earn the right to say whatever you want, especially to those who think showing up 3 years later, inflicted less than 3% of all casualties somehow equates to doing all of the hard work and saving the day.

The only thing the U.S. saved in Europe was the German, Italian, French and Polish languages.
My first question to you would be have you studied our military divisions and were they were station during WW2. It may help you understand our involvement. ONE example would be 9th Infantry Division. It would show we were very much involved. When you say what I think you are saying you are indeed taking away from American lives lost in the war.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Funny how you completely make shit up while everything I state is fact but I'm somehow the fake guy.

You're Trump, aren't you?
3rd Army was not a fact guy. It was a mistake and a big one. Being a WW2 hobbyist as you so claim, that is one mistake that is questionable of your ability to recall. Not calling you a fake, just saying you don't know as much as you think...in some areas
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
I make shit up?
Yes, you do. Let's review:

They were winning until we stepped in.
FALSE: By the time we "stepped in", it was already over. The end for Germany was inevitable. Even if we had never set foot on the European continent, the only thing that would have changed would be that Russia would presently own it all.

And by 1944, we were involved for years.
FALSE: Exactly one year. We landed in Italy in 1943. Other than that, all we did was carpet bomb cities in mass genocide to try to punish the Germans into surrendering which never, ever had a chance of working. Not that anybody gave a shit back then. Civilians were fair game.

They didn't appreciate their veterans much.
FALSE: The Russian's have many monuments to their fallen, both military, civilian and political. In fact, they take far better care of their dead than we do. Even in Arlington they've taken to just throwing old tomb stones in a ditch to make room for new burials. Hell, France takes better care of our dead from both world wars than we do.

You're wrong on every single count you posted. You're the typical "murica" idiot that thinks we did it all, that nobody else lifted a finger, that without us all was lost. The truth is we did nothing much in Europe other than supply food, oil, gas and materials. THEY did all the heavy lifting.

It was the other way around in the Pacific though, which oddly, you fail to even discuss when I made the point.

But keep on beating your chest about how great we never were. You're the reason Europe looks at us and says, "What the ever loving fuck is wrong with those assholes?"
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
to go along with his pretend law degree too. he's a multi-field master of google and wikipedia
I especially liked a year ago when he defended the cops side when a bunch of kids got busted for a small amount of weed at a house party for being loud.

Probably still mad that nobody agreed with him.
 
Top