Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to replace Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court

Unclebaldrick · Jul 12, 2018

Fogdog said:
Most are primaries against other liberals in liberal districtts for local and state offices. Given the thousands of races this year 2 dozen is hardly something to be excited about. For national office, Progressives(TM) endorsed by Our Revolution's who won their primaries number at 8. 210 seats to go for a majority.

They won primaries in liberal districts. Ocasio-Cortez for example won in a safe Democratic district. Before you start crowing, start winning against Republicans in conservative districts as Democrats from the productive wing of the party have done and are set to do in the fall.

We need to win more than 218 seats. Progressives(TM) and the 8 or fewer seats they hold will be a welcome but small group in the Democratc caucus.

Racist!

Fogdog · Jul 12, 2018

Unclebaldrick said:
Racist!

I'm so intolerant

Unclebaldrick · Jul 12, 2018

schuylaar said:
fail. pinny's been suicidal. We used to PM. He told me a lot of things during that time..things which some may consider disturbing..things that I kept to myself but once you know you might not like him so much.

where is pinny anyway?

So it's ok that Tty called him a fa**ot, right?

Pinny gets deleted pretty much within a day of coming back. Sometimes it seems to be a function of his own actions and sometimes because your buddy FDS2black ("come back, I miss you") rats him out to the site owner.

Fogdog · Jul 12, 2018

Padawanbater2 said:
Ocasio-Cortez beat Crowley, a 10 term incumbent, as a white male. Crowley won 10 times, yet OC comes in and steals it from him and all of a sudden it's a "diverse district"? She even won the fucking white vote, 57%. Fuck yourself

She didn't win cuz she was latina, racist, she won because her platform was better than the establishments

Lee Carter in Virginia
Randall Woodfin in Birmingham, Virginia
Brent Welder in Nebraska is poised to win
O'Rourke in Texas has a good chance of beating Cruz
Nixon in New York has a good chance of beating Cuomo

Want more?

Yeah, I'd like to hear more. For one, your list is a mix of people who are and are not endorsed by "Our Revolution". Are you saying they are irrelevant now and you can just make up who is a Progressive(TM)?

Let me hear you name all 218 Progressives(TM), by the way. Near as I can tell, you might get all the way to 8 endorsed Our Revolution Candidates. Who are the other 210?

And, you are dreaming about Nixon and O'Rouke.

Republicans are going to show up in strong numbers in the fall. I don't know why you want to hurt the chances of displacing them in Congress by your smear tactics against good Democratic Party candidates. All you are doing is helping Trump.

ttystikk · Jul 12, 2018

UncleBuck said:
Isn’t name calling the sign of an intolerant liberal?

Your name calling of pinworm using a bigoted slur made him suicidal

Amazing projection. Funny that he didn't mention how he used the term first, multiple times.

Care to explain that?

And when you're done, maybe you can explain the amazing power you say I have over people I barely know?!

Utter failure, Buckwit. Reeks of desperation.

ttystikk · Jul 12, 2018

zeddd said:
You are a bona fide example of too stupid to realise his own stupidity, it’s quite rare amongst those who know how to log on. You post garbage written by incoherent jingle mongers, rather like yourself recently.

Oh look, another stain of verbal diarrhea, signifying nothing.

At least we know what you're good at.

ttystikk · Jul 12, 2018

INF Flux said:
I like how willfully ignorant followers of con artists always try to insult non-believers intelligence, as if following the con somehow makes them smarter.

Following the con artist doesn't take any mental effort. It's been the easy way out for the intellectually lazy and deficient ever since civilisation began.

ttystikk · Jul 12, 2018

Fogdog said:
Most are primaries against other liberals in liberal districtts for local and state offices. Given the thousands of races this year 2 dozen is hardly something to be excited about. For national office, Progressives(TM) endorsed by Our Revolution's who won their primaries number at 8. 210 seats to go for a majority.

They won primaries in liberal districts. Ocasio-Cortez for example won in a safe Democratic district. Before you start crowing, start winning against Republicans in conservative districts as Democrats from the productive wing of the party have done and are set to do in the fall.

We need to win more than 218 seats. Progressives(TM) and the 8 or fewer seats they hold will be a welcome but small group in the Democratc caucus.

I'd call it welcome progress. You're the one who's so clearly threatened.

ttystikk · Jul 12, 2018

Unclebaldrick said:
So it's ok that Tty called him a fa**ot, right?

Pinny gets deleted pretty much within a day of coming back. Sometimes it seems to be a function of his own actions and sometimes because your buddy FDS2black ("come back, I miss you") rats him out to the site owner.

A little to the left, you missed a spot.

They're still dirty from when he used you.

Fogdog · Jul 12, 2018

ttystikk said:
I'd call it welcome progress. You're the one who's so clearly threatened.

I'm happy with more progressives Congress, even if they are Progressives(TM). What I wish you Progressives(TM) would stop doing is carrying right wing's propaganda messages to suppress the vote for Democrats.

ttystikk · Jul 12, 2018

Fogdog said:
I'm happy with more progressives Congress, even if they are Progressives(TM). What I wish you Progressives(TM) would stop doing is carrying right wing's propaganda messages to suppress the vote for Democrats.

The Democrats are the ones desperately trying to suppress a movement that would help them return to plurality.

Why haven't you wondered what's up with that?

Maybe it's because the apparatchiks in the DCCC and elsewhere in the party know they'd lose their gravy train?

Fogdog · Jul 12, 2018

ttystikk said:
The Democrats are the ones desperately trying to suppress a movement that would help them return to plurality.

Why haven't you wondered what's up with that?

Maybe it's because the apparatchiks in the DCCC and elsewhere in the party know they'd lose their gravy train?

The DCCC spent almost all of its millions campaigning against Republicans. What did Our Revolution do for the people it endorsed? We already know that Justice Democrats just took donations and handed it themselves.

Democratic party primaries this year were virtually entirely funded by donations from individuals. Of the PACs that contributed, most were unions and concerned citizen PACs.

There are no cases where the DCCC suppressed Progressive(TM) candidates.

ttystikk · Jul 12, 2018

Fogdog said:
The DCCC spent almost all of its millions campaigning against Republicans. What did Our Revolution do for the people it endorsed? We already know that Justice Democrats just took donations and handed it themselves.

Democratic party primaries this year were virtually entirely funded by donations from individuals. Of the PACs that contributed, most were unions and concerned citizen PACs.

There are no cases where the DCCC suppressed Progressive(TM) candidates.

Funny how they spend money against Progressives, then?

Fogdog · Jul 12, 2018

ttystikk said:
Funny how they spend money against Progressives, then?

So, give me an example of this "Money Spent Against Progressives(TM) to Suppress" you talk about? How much, who, why is it called suppression?

londonfog · Jul 12, 2018

Fogdog said:
So, give me an example of this "Money Spent Against Progressives(TM) to Suppress" you talk about? How much, who, why is it called suppression?

I think I might see if I can find some recipes for crickets. That question will provide plenty of fresh meat

Fogdog · Jul 12, 2018

londonfog said:
I think I might see if I can find some recipes for crickets. That question will provide plenty of fresh meat

@ttystikk and @Padawanbater2 are heavy on generalities and light in specifics.

It should be fair to ask which candidates were suppressed by the DCCC I would think.

londonfog · Jul 12, 2018

Fogdog said:
@ttystikk and @Padawanbater2 are heavy on generalities and light in specifics.

It should be fair to ask which candidates were suppressed by the DCCC I would think.

it is fair. I would think he would have an answer already, maybe he had has to still do his "homework"

Fogdog · Jul 12, 2018

londonfog said:
it is fair. I would think he would have an answer already, maybe he had has to still do his "homework"

@ttystikk , which Progressive(TM) candidates were suppressed by DCCC spending? How much was spent and what did they spend it on?

Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte
Outside Spending Summary 2018
Total Independent Expenditures: $11,237,553
For Democrats: $789,613
Against Democrats: $0
For Republicans: $137,052
Against Republicans: $10,540,157
Total Electioneering Communications: $0

Based on data released daily by the FEC on July 09, 2018.

https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/detail.php?cmte=C00000935

ttystikk · Jul 12, 2018

Fogdog said:
So, give me an example of this "Money Spent Against Progressives(TM) to Suppress" you talk about? How much, who, why is it called suppression?

https://www.vox.com/2018/3/7/17084808/dccc-laura-moser-texas-democratic-primary-2018

ttystikk · Jul 12, 2018

Fogdog said:
@ttystikk , which Progressive(TM) candidates were suppressed by DCCC spending? How much was spent and what did they spend it on?

Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte
Outside Spending Summary 2018
Total Independent Expenditures: $11,237,553
For Democrats: $789,613
Against Democrats: $0
For Republicans: $137,052
Against Republicans: $10,540,157
Total Electioneering Communications: $0

Based on data released daily by the FEC on July 09, 2018.

https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/detail.php?cmte=C00000935

Lol

Where did you get that?

And why would you believe it?

Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to replace Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member