This picture is creating a FIRESTORM!!

What do you think about this picture?

  • 1.) I Love it! 5 stars

    Votes: 53 53.0%

  • 2.) I like it! 4 stars

    Votes: 10 10.0%

  • 3.) I am neutral! 3 stars

    Votes: 18 18.0%

  • 4.) I do not like it! 2 stars

    Votes: 6 6.0%

  • 5.) I Hate it! 1 star

    Votes: 13 13.0%
  • Total voters
    100
  • Poll closed .
Yeah I have no issue with it. Art can be whatever you make it.

Like it is a joke that you all think he is a socialist. And I need to use the newest depiction of a cartoon character because otherwise the people that feel this way would not understand it.

I would call it da-da.
 
It's no more offensive than this:

attachment.php


This was published in Vanity Fair in 2008.

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2008/07/bush-as-joker.html
 

Attachments

  • BushtheJoker.jpg
    BushtheJoker.jpg
    112.1 KB · Views: 33
Apparently I'm visually impaired because I have no clue who ^^^that^^^ is. I also need to see this movie because I don't get the whole Joker thing. Either way, I cannot see why anyone would be offended by these pics.
 
jrh72582 said:
Apparently I'm visually impaired because I have no clue who ^^^that^^^ is. I also need to see this movie because I don't get the whole Joker thing. Either way, I cannot see why anyone would be offended by these pics.
Click to expand...
The Dark Knight is actually a pretty good film.

It did not live to the hype because it was too ambitious, but the Joker was electric.

Pure anarchy and destruction for its own sake.
 
Johnnyorganic said:
The Dark Knight is actually a pretty good film.

It did not live to the hype because it was too ambitious, but the Joker was electric.

Pure anarchy and destruction for its own sake.
Click to expand...

So by painting GW's and Obama's face like the Joker, they're saying these people stand for anarchy and destruction for it's own sake? Seems a stretch, unless I'm putting too much intention into something that's meant to be anecdotal. It seems as though this specific Joker really became a cultural icon for a while.
 
jrh72582 said:
So by painting GW's and Obama's face like the Joker, they're saying these people stand for anarchy and destruction for it's own sake? Seems a stretch, unless I'm putting too much intention into something that's meant to be anecdotal. It seems as though this specific Joker really became a cultural icon for a while.
Click to expand...
I suppose one must see the motion picture to understand the motivation of a character who sets fire to an enormous a pile of money with a Chinese gangster bound and gagged on top of it. Then says, "It's not about about the money. It's about sending a message."

It's not arthouse cinema. It's not Fellini or Ingmar Bergman. It's just entertainment. A popcorn movie...

that grossed over a billion dollars worldwide.
 
Obama is just fucking great.
Fuck him, that picture is great.
I'm not going to school because of that bastard. [MJC]
 
i don't find it controversial. just stupid and completely lacking sense.
besides, the joker is most likely a nihilist/anarchist.
 
Its cool with me..... Dont agree with the message, but everyone has there own opinion and I accept that (cool picture although). That is why we live in the US ehh. We can digrace the President of the United States, but cant smoke a joint legally in our own house. WTF
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Aeroknow
Anybody here post on Yahooo comments?
Replies
15
Views
2K
Gemtree
Gemtree
beegreenie740
I have a few questions so that's why I didn't put this question in the auto flower part.
Replies
14
Views
612
go go kid
go go kid
J
whats the best hash you ever had?
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
420 Garden
420 Garden
T
How to fix your old AC Infinity fans....
Replies
0
Views
362
Tomatoesonly
T
refriedbeano
The future workflow of harvesting bud? The Cannaster!
Replies
4
Views
790
refriedbeano
refriedbeano
Back
Top