Your Neanderthal way of thinking is reducing children to the level of property, you make decisions concerning their bodies and they can'tYou may call it murder but SCOTUS didn't agree with your kind of thinking over 4 decades ago And they won't agree with you now ok knuckle dragger!
Your Neanderthal way of thinking is reducing women to the level of property, you make decisions concerning their bodies and they can't.
B4L
Your Neanderthal way of thinking is reducing children to the level of property, you make decisions concerning their bodies and they can't
Those women made a decision, then decide to sacrifice someone else's life when they changed their mind. You seem to think morality is dependent on what you want for your own selfish reasons, then try to assume a holier-than-thou attitude.
It's her right to do with her body what she and her DR. Decide to do. Period! You don't have any reason to change that. Case closed. Stop being pigheaded about it.Your Neanderthal way of thinking is reducing children to the level of property, you make decisions concerning their bodies and they can't
Those women made a decision, then decide to sacrifice someone else's life when they changed their mind. You seem to think morality is dependent on what you want for your own selfish reasons, then try to assume a holier-than-thou attitude.
It's not her body that she is chopping up and vacuuming out.It's her right to do with her body what she and her DR. Decide to do. Period! You don't have any reason to change that. Case closed. Stop being pigheaded about it.
BTW it wasn't an emaculate conception she didn't get pregnant all by herself.
B4L
"Children" would be able to survive outside of the womb.Your Neanderthal way of thinking is reducing children to the level of property, you make decisions concerning their bodies and they can't
Those women made a decision, then decide to sacrifice someone else's life when they changed their mind. You seem to think morality is dependent on what you want for your own selfish reasons, then try to assume a holier-than-thou attitude.
But that's her decision to make not yours or anyone else.It's not her body that she is chopping up and vacuuming out.
Oh, I know it's her decision to murder. Murder is always someone's decision. You failed completely to address the fact that it is not her body that she is chopping up and vacuuming out.But that's her decision to make not yours or anyone else.
B4L
Oh, I know it's her decision to murder. Murder is always someone's decision. You failed completely to address the fact that it is not her body that she is chopping up and vacuuming out.
Republican Supreme Court said that it was OK (before the Bible thumping idiots took the party over). So is it safe to assume that you're a bible thumping idiot?Oh, I know it's her decision to murder. Murder is always someone's decision. You failed completely to address the fact that it is not her body that she is chopping up and vacuuming out.
So, if I want to "chop up and vacuum" someone, oh, say you, it's my decision? I could live with that on my conscious. The Constitution says we have the right to life, explicitly. Abortion isn't mentioned in the Constitution at all, however, the right to life and to bear arms are. Strange how you use a document that is completely opposite your position to try to claim justifies your statements. I can only deduce you are Hilary Clinton's unsuccessful abortion.Are you dense, I absolutely did answer your chauvinistic query? But since you rather be all up in a woman's coochie and make decisions that doesn't concern you, I'm not surprised you would think my answer was not satisfactory to you. But I will indulge you and answer once more...it's her decision if she wants to "chop up and vacuum" her yet unborn fetus, that's her decision not yours. She will carry that decision on her conscious the rest of her life, but to deny her the ability to have a legal procedure performed on her, wether you like it or not, is unconstitutional. You know that pesky document that righties love so much.
The leftys in this country are sick and tired that sensible gun controls are not the law of the land. We are more concerned about the living than the unborn. Yet the righties love to complain about how the leftys in this country like to restrict the law of gun rights, yet that's exactly what the right does, restrict a woman's right to choose.
Stay the fuck out of a woman's coochie if you don't like the way the law is written.
The righties are such hypocrites the minute a girlfriend, wife or mistress gets pregnant they take advantage of the law.
B4L
So, if I want to "chop up and vacuum" someone, oh, say you, it's my decision? I could live with that on my conscious. The Constitution says we have the right to life, explicitly. Abortion isn't mentioned in the Constitution at all, however, the right to life and to bear arms are. Strange how you use a document that is completely opposite your position to try to claim justifies your statements. I can only deduce you are Hilary Clinton's unsuccessful abortion.
What about when their freedom is at the cost of someone else's life? Are you not turning one person into "property" so someome else won't be inconvienced?No, it is limited to the fetus in a woman's womb and her personal decision along with that of her doctor.
Which part of that dont you understand?
If you want freedom you have to allow for other people to have freedom even if their actions offend you.
So, if I want to "chop up and vacuum" someone, oh, say you, it's my decision? I could live with that on my conscious. The Constitution says we have the right to life, explicitly. Abortion isn't mentioned in the Constitution at all, however, the right to life and to bear arms are. Strange how you use a document that is completely opposite your position to try to claim justifies your statements. I can only deduce your all are Hilary Clinton's unsuccessful abortion.
Actually it isIt's not her body that she is chopping up and vacuuming out.
Dred Scott decision was the law of the land, too.Roe vs wade IS the law of the land confirmed by a Republican court as it been pointed out to you several times deal with it.
If your so opposed to abortion stay the hell away from a woman's coochie and use your hands to pleasure yourself end of story.
B4L
Some one person can own another? I'll put you dowrn in the "for" debate on slavery.Actually it is
So I'm not allowed to procreate?Roe vs wade IS the law of the land confirmed by a Republican court as it been pointed out to you several times deal with it.
If your so opposed to abortion stay the hell away from a woman's coochie and use your hands to pleasure yourself end of story.
B4L
Rowe vs Wade outlawed abortion at the second trimester.Roe vs wade IS the law of the land confirmed by a Republican court as it been pointed out to you several times deal with it.
If your so opposed to abortion stay the hell away from a woman's coochie and use your hands to pleasure yourself end of story.
B4L
What about when their freedom is at the cost of someone else's life? Are you not turning one person into "property" so someome else won't be inconvienced?
End of fucking discussion. 43 years ago.Roe vs wade IS the law of the land