The Reactionary Left

Brick Top

New Member
Self-Reliance To Self-Pity: Road Now Most Traveled



By MARK STEYN Posted 10/28/2011 06:54 PM ET




Last Thursday was officially "Diaper Need Awareness Day" in the state of Connecticut. Were you aware of it? There are so many awareness-raising days, it's hard to keep track. Maybe we could have an Awareness-Raising Day Awareness Day.


At any rate, the first annual Diaper Need Awareness Day was proclaimed by Dan Malloy, governor of the Nutmeg State, and they had a big old awareness-raising get-together in New Haven.


It's not clear yet whether they've got an official ribbon. We're running a bit low on ribbon colors these days: It's not just pink ribbons for breast cancer, but also teal for agoraphobia, periwinkle for acid reflux, pink and blue ribbons for amniotic fluid embolisms and pinstripe ribbons for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.


We could use a Ribbon-Hue Awareness Day to raise awareness about how we're falling behind in the race for more ribbon colors.


If you're wondering what sentient being isn't aware of diapers, you're missing the point: Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro is raising awareness of the need for diapers in order to, as Politico reported, "push the federal government to provide free diapers to poor families."


Congresswoman DeLauro has introduced the "DIAPER" Act — that's to say, the Diaper Investment and Aid to Promote Economic Recovery Act Act. So don't worry, it's not welfare, it's "stimulus." As Fox News put it, "A U.S. congresswoman in Connecticut wants to boost the economy by offering free diapers to low-income families."


And, given that sinking bazillions of dollars into green jobs schemes to build eco-cars in Finland and a federal program to buy guns for Mexican drug cartels and all the other fascinating innovations of the Obama administration haven't worked, who's to say borrowing money from the Chinese Politburo and sticking it in your kid's diaper isn't the kind of outside-the-box thinking that won't do the trick?


In fact, the federal government already provides free diapers for at least one lucky American. Stanley Thornton Jr. of California receives Supplementary Security Income disability checks from the Social Security Administration in order to sit around the house all day wearing a giant diaper and a giant onesie, sucking on a giant pacifier and playing with a giant baby rattle.


Infantilized America

Stanley Jr. runs a website for fellow "adult babies" called BedWettingABDL.com. I believe I first heard of the "adult baby" phenomenon some years ago in London. If memory serves, there was a club, and the members lay around in giant cribs being read bedtime stories by a bosomy nanny. Minor celebrities and possibly backbench Tory members of Parliament may have been involved.


In those days, it was what we called a "fetish," and you had to do it on your own dime. Now it's a "disability" and the United States government picks up the tab. And, if that's not progress, what is?


Sen. Tom Coburn happened to catch Stan with his babysitter and fellow disability check recipient on a reality show, and wondered how a chap capable of running a popular website and doing such complicated carpentry jobs as his own giant highchair could be legitimately classified as "disabled."


But the Social Security Administration said Junior qualifies, and Sen. Coburn was condemned as heartless: Why, if those mean Republicans got their way, the streets would be crawling with giant babies bawling, "I want my Mommy!"


Conversely, if Congresswoman DeLauro gets her way and the stampede for government Huggies gets going, Stanley Thornton Jr will still be entitled to park his giant pedal car in the disabled space while the penniless single mom from Hartford has to leave the Toyota at the back of the lot and hike in.


An able-bodied man paid by the government of the United States to lie in a giant crib wetting his diaper week in week out is almost too poignant an emblem of the republic at twilight.


But, as Hillaire Belloc wrote, "Always keep a hold of Nurse/For fear of finding something worse." Only last week, ABC News reported:


"At a million-dollar San Francisco fundraiser today, President Obama warned his recession-battered supporters that if he loses the 2012 election it could herald a new, painful era of self-reliance in America."


Oh, no! The horror!


"Self-reliance" is now a pejorative? Nice to have that clarified. And San Francisco, a city that registers more dogs than it has kids enrolled in its schools and in which adults are perforce the children they never bothered having, seems as good a place as any to make it official.


In less enlightened times, "self-reliance" was the great animating principle of the American experiment.


By the standards of the day, George III was one of the most benign, caring rulers on earth: You were his mewling charges, and he was the regal babysitter.


'Self-Reliant': A Bad Thing?

Then a bunch of settlers in small towns clinging to wilderness and thousands of miles from His Majesty The Nanny decided they didn't need him and they could stand on their own. What's the word for that? Oh, yeah: self-reliance.


Is it too late for a Self-Reliance Awareness Day? No, there's no ribbons. Make your own damn ribbon. If that's too much to hope for, how about a Multi-Trillion-Dollar Debt Awareness Day? The ribbon starts out black but turns deeper and deeper red. How about a We've Spent All The Money Including The Money For An Awareness-Raising Ribbon Day? An Impending Societal Collapse Awareness Day?


Yes, yes. I'm aware the cost of diapers adds up over a month, and you can't use your Food Stamps to pay for them. Tough. This country's broke. As I said last week, it has to pay back $15 trillion just to get back to having nothing at all.


And that's more money than anyone ever has had to pay back. Were you aware of that? Distressingly large numbers of Americans still pining for ever more swaddling in the government cradle seem entirely unaware.


Congresswoman DeLauro is thinking too small: Maybe we could all be issued with free diapers. As a casual glance at the headlines suggests, there's almost nothing you can't get government to pay for, but that's no reason not to demand more.


At its core, the "Occupy Wall Street" movement (in the political rather than the diaper-filling sense) is a plea for ever more extended adolescence funded at public expense. Don't knock it. Dozing around listening to drum circles all day is more dangerous than it looks.


Last week, several dozen members of "Occupy Las Vegas" occupying land located under the final approach to Runway 19 at McCarran International Airport narrowly missed being hit by a 50-pound slab of what's euphemistically known as "blue ice" that fell from the bathroom of the president's plane.


Perhaps, as a symbol of the new post-self-reliant America of adult babies, Air Force One should be fitted with a giant diaper.


http://news.investors.com/Article/589814/201110281854/Self-Reliance-To-Self-Pity-Road-Now-Most-Traveled.htm
 

Charlie Ventura

Active Member
that little fish is a critical part of the food chain. save the farmers to screw the fishermen?

short-sighted talking point you got from hannity. way to be a good little parrot.
A good little parrot? *lol* ... and you, Uncle Buckie are a freaking tool ... or as Lenin would say: "a useful idiot."

I live in California. I've driven through the Central Valley on several occasions on my way to visit friends in Mendocino County. All of the once beautiful almond orchards are dried to the bone. What was once the food basket of the nation is suffering from a congress made drought.

I don't need Hannity to voice my talking points for me, unlike you, who probably drools like a freakin' idiot over your monthly issue of Mother Jones.

Don't you have a Wall Street protest to go to, or something? I mean ... WTF!

<Sheesh!>

 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
A good little parrot? *lol* ... and you, Uncle Buckie are a freaking tool ... or as Lenin would say: "a useful idiot."

I live in California. I've driven through the Central Valley on several occasions on my way to visit friends in Mendocino County. All of the once beautiful almond orchards are dried to the bone. What was once the food basket of the nation is suffering from a congress made drought.

I don't need Hannity to voice my talking points for me, unlike you, who probably drools like a freakin' idiot over your monthly issue of Mother Jones.

Don't you have a Wall Street protest to go to, or something? I mean ... WTF!

<Sheesh!>

still unable to address the fact that turning on the water would have disastrous and ruinous consequences elsewhere, i see.

you just like to repeat the old "congress created dust bowl" bullshit that you see on every sign along the I-5, along with the badmouthing of nancy pelosi that comes with it.

nevermind that many of the farmers sell their water to others for a profit.

those poor, poor megafarms that rely heavily on exploiting illegal labor to turn a profit. poor, poor them. i'll be sure to cry some crocodile tears for them.

 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
still unable to address the fact that turning on the water would have disastrous and ruinous consequences elsewhere, i see.

you just like to repeat the old "congress created dust bowl" bullshit that you see on every sign along the I-5, along with the badmouthing of nancy pelosi that comes with it.

How many decades has the water been flowing to that region? Now, all of a sudden the survival of this fish is worth shutting down farmland that has been providing produce for as long as anyone can remember. I have news for you, 99.9+% of all species that have roamed the earth, have gone extinct... the number is in the billions. Yet, the earth kept spinning, life continued to thrive, the earth didn't even blink.

In the end, it will all be revealed as Eco-loon horseshit anyways, future research will show it was all for nothing, just like the spotted owl, but the restrictions will remain.

The end justifies the means with these liberal scumbags. As someone who was born and raised in Southern California, I couldn't be happier about not living there any more. You people are out of your fucking minds.
 

Brick Top

New Member
The Reactionary Left

Nov 7, 2011, Vol. 17, No. 08 • By MATTHEW CONTINETTI




http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/reactionary-left_604180.html#



That slight dizziness you’re feeling is a contact high from the clouds of left-wing nostalgia in New York City and Washington. The anarchists, anti-globalization activists, student radicals, and sympathetic journalists gathered at Occupy Wall Street desperately are trying to recapture the protest spirit of the 1960s. Meanwhile, Democrats from Paul Krugman to Barack Obama pine for the economy of the 1950s, when the distribution of incomes was much more equal than today. At the same time, high unemployment, lackluster growth, and austerity have led these Democrats to attempt to restore the politics of the 1930s, pitting “economic royalists” against the downtrodden masses. We knew liberals believed in recycling, but this is getting ridiculous.


The very notion of a backward-looking left is laughable. Since its inception during the French Revolution, the left has been the party of progress, riding the wave of history to that distant shore where man will cast off the chains of society and live a truly authentic, free, and “natural” life. It’s been the conservatives who have looked in the other direction, tapping the lefties on the shoulder and reminding them that faith and tradition are important guides to human action and shouldn’t be cast off lightly. In contemporary America the equation has been reversed: Tea Party populists support drastic measures to revitalize the American government and economy, while left-wing class warriors want nothing more than to maintain the broken structures of the welfare state.





What happened to the American left’s utopianism, its sense of adventure, its fearless derring-do? Today’s liberals say conservatives are radicals who want to overturn the American political tradition (as liberals understand it). What remains of the liberal confidence in progress seems to be restricted to the culture, where Americans continue to perform occasional experiments of living. But even the cultural left seems withered, exhausted, ready to go to that big Oneida community in the sky. So what’s a Rousseau to do? Ruminate on his glory days, and pretend that Occupy Wall Street is something more than it is.


Our most notable egalitarians locate their ideal economy not in some unrealized future but in the postwar United States. “America in the 1950s was a middle-class society,” Paul Krugman writes in Conscience of a Liberal, “to a far greater extent than it had been in the 1920s&#8203;—&#8203;or than it is today.” President Obama recalls in his economic speeches a lost world in which “millionaires and billionaires” paid “their fair share,” a high school graduate spent his life on the factory line, American manufacturing was tops, and there were no nasty ATMs to destroy jobs. The New Frontier of space exploration and technological achievement has closed. Gone too are the visions of a Great Society that achieves “equality as a fact and equality as a result.” What remains is a set of actuarial tables that determine with exquisite precision the optimal distribution of income in a fair society.


Even if you grant the premise that government should redistribute wealth to equalize incomes, the 1950s are odd years for the left to champion. “Social injustice remained pervasive,” Krugman cautions. Um, yeah. That’s the point: There is more to equality than pay schedules and tax rates. There is, for example, the composition of the workforce. Harriet did not take a second mortgage to finance her craft moisturizer boutique while Ozzie went to his UAW office. Harriet stayed at home. So did millions of women in the 1950s, thereby restricting the supply of labor and raising Ozzie’s wages.


You cannot have the economy of the 1950s without the society of the 1950s. Ozzie and Harriet were married. They could pool resources in ways today’s single parents and twentysomethings cannot. They did not have to worry about an influx of day laborers from Latin America or a flood of cheap goods from China. They lived in a society a portion of which systematically oppressed a minority race. Their government focused almost the sum total of its resources on defense and Social Security. There was no Medicare or Medicaid or war on poverty. It was the age of the “organization man,” the “lonely crowd,” of alienation and monopoly and “conformity.” All of these factors&#8203;—&#8203;not just high levels of unionization and a punishing top marginal tax rate&#8203;—&#8203;went into making 1950s America a “middle-class society.” Is this a tradeoff Americans would be willing to make?


The wistful left reaches back farther when it mimics the class politics of the 1930s. The “99 percent” versus the “1 percent,” Warren Buffett’s secretary versus Warren Buffett, Obama’s attacks on nameless “millionaires and billionaires” are echoes of the rhetoric of Huey Long, Father Coughlin, and Franklin Roosevelt. What is puzzling is that the strategy of division and resentment has not had a good track record. To be sure, it worked for FDR. But Roosevelt had 25 percent unemployment, a minuscule federal government, and a sunny disposition. Since LBJ, the spokesmen for American liberalism have been dour and passive and condescending. Their populism has lacked bite because it is a pose. The public has seen through their attempt to rehash the old formula for what it is: “the shield and slogan of the cunning who will rule in the name of equality,” as Martin Diamond once put it.


The longing for the culture of the ’60s, the economy of the ’50s, and the politics of the ’30s is evidence of the left’s failure. No longer able to inspire with a utopian vision of the future, the left has been forced to return to its past. The left’s failure, then, is the right’s victory, because a return to the past is what we’ve been calling for all along.


But which past? Certainly not the left’s. But neither should conservatives indulge in their own nostalgias. What Americans should be trying to recapture is not any particular set of historical social, economic, or cultural conditions but a lost philosophy of government, a missing understanding of politics. In this understanding, the equality that matters is the equal protection of natural rights. The government that levels inequalities of property or condition necessarily intrudes on those rights. Lucky for us, this view of government depends on self-evident truths that are the same in every time and every place.


Nostalgia? Reminiscences? Schmaltz? No thanks. Leave them for the progressives.


http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/reactionary-left_604180.html
 
The Reactionary LeftThat slight dizziness you&#8217;re feeling is a contact high from the clouds of left-wing nostalgia in New York City and Washington.
well he has got one thing right, i am dizzy from a contact high. but i will find fault with him cause the clouds are my making and have nothing to do with the east coast. I have been there and their weed sucks, and cant touch the Michigan weed!!
 

massah

Well-Known Member
well he has got one thing right, i am dizzy from a contact high. but i will find fault with him cause the clouds are my making and have nothing to do with the east coast. I have been there and their weed sucks, and cant touch the Michigan weed!!
Comeon out to Maine and check out our indoor bud...awesome stuff :D
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
How many decades has the water been flowing to that region? Now, all of a sudden the survival of this fish is worth shutting down farmland that has been providing produce for as long as anyone can remember. I have news for you, 99.9+% of all species that have roamed the earth, have gone extinct... the number is in the billions. Yet, the earth kept spinning, life continued to thrive, the earth didn't even blink.

In the end, it will all be revealed as Eco-loon horseshit anyways, future research will show it was all for nothing, just like the spotted owl, but the restrictions will remain.

The end justifies the means with these liberal scumbags. As someone who was born and raised in Southern California, I couldn't be happier about not living there any more. You people are out of your fucking minds.
i see you were selective in not addressing the fact that these are megafarms that exploit illegal immigrants for cheap labor. they often sell their water for a profit to others, like local municipalities.

they're doing fine.

if they turned on the water and the fishing industry up the river died, you'd have something else to bitch about.

"obama doesn't care about the fishermen or the thousands of jobs they spur in the processing, shipping, canning, or distributing" :roll:

partisan hackery at its finest.
 

Charlie Ventura

Active Member
still unable to address the fact that turning on the water 1. would have disastrous and ruinous consequences elsewhere, i see.

you just like to repeat the old "congress created dust bowl" bullshit that you see on every sign along the I-5, 2. along with the badmouthing of nancy pelosi that comes with it.

nevermind that many of the farmers 3. sell their water to others for a profit.

those poor, poor megafarms that rely heavily on 4. exploiting illegal labor to turn a profit. poor, poor them. i'll be sure to cry some crocodile tears for them.

1. What exactly would those "disastrous and ruinous consequences" be, Uncle Buckie?

2. Where did I "badmouth Nancy Pelosi" in my post? Not that the crazy lady doesn't deserve it. In fact, she belongs in the loony bin ... along with Barbara Boxer. :lol)

3. And of course, in your left bent mind, profit is evil, right?

4. The left always finds exploitation between the worker and owners. Have you ever traveled down into the heart of Mexico away from the borders, Uncle Buckie? Have you seen the small villages with open sewers? Have you seen little children begging on the streets? Are these people better off in every way on the streets of Mexico or working in the fields of California searching for a better life?

When immigrants come to this country to work they usually take entry level jobs. This has been true of all immigrants new to this country ... yes, even the ones who came from Eastern and Western Europe.

Have you ever explored the pay methods of a lot of our farms and ranches, Uncle Buckie? Did you know that a lot of farm workers are paid by "piece work?" In other words, the more they pick, the more they make ... kind of like a commissioned sales person. The harder and more efficiently you work, the more you're paid.

Do you have any feelings for the unemployed farm worker in the Central Valley?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
1. What exactly would those "disastrous and ruinous consequences" be, Uncle Buckie?
look up "food chain". apply concept of "food chain" to the people that make their living not only as fishermen, but also the people who can, process, distribute, ship, etc what the fisherment bring in. then slam your head into the nearest heavy, blunt object. repeatedly.

2. Where did I "badmouth Nancy Pelosi" in my post? Not that the crazy lady doesn't deserve it. In fact, she belongs in the loony bin ... along with Barbara Boxer. :lol)
i was referring to the roadside signs, actually. good job on parroting them verbatim, though. right down to the barbara boxer hatred. :lol:

3. And of course, in your left bent mind, profit is evil, right?
not at all, that is your impotent attempt to caricaturize my position. i am simply pointing out that these are not mom and pop farms just barely squeezing by. some of them are, but the vast majority are not. they are simply mad that they are not making money by selling the water that they get for so cheap AS WELL AS also having MORE water to make money hand over fist another way.

they are not dying. they are not going broke. they are making money selling what water they do have, instead of using it to fix their "dust bowl".

congress created dust bowl? more like "greed created" dust bowl.

4. The left always finds exploitation between the worker and owners. Have you ever traveled down into the heart of Mexico away from the borders, Uncle Buckie? Have you seen the small villages with open sewers? Have you seen little children begging on the streets? Are these people better off in every way on the streets of Mexico or working in the fields of California searching for a better life?
suddenly you are pro-illegal immigration?

do you find it difficult to keep track of which side of your mouth you are speaking from?

Do you have any feelings for the unemployed farm worker in the Central Valley?
yeah, i do.

i wish the megafarms would stop selling their water for a profit and instead use it to irrigate their fields and put these people back to work.

they can't sell their water AND use it too. just like you can't have your cake and eat it too.

if they want enough water to not only sell for a profit AND to irrigate their fields, you will devastate other industries up the river.

do you not understand how this works?
 

Coals

Active Member
All of you need to wake up and step out of the Matrix. These petty arguments are exactly what they want you to be doing. Arguing with yourselves over meaningless shit while they fleece you, your children and the country behind your backs.

Left vs Right is the fight they want you fighting, not the fight you should be fighting.
 
Top