<The mouth smoking method>

jigfresh

Well-Known Member
Interesting. I like to get pretty damn high, so this I think would be a waste for me

My wife doesn't smoke at all, and there are times when it would be good for her too (when she has cramps, sometimes nausea from flu). I will see if she can try this, maybe a good alternative.

aside, doesn't it suck when you post a thread and no one says anything.
 

foolsgold

Well-Known Member
Seems to me this will simply be a way to switch where area you choose to inflict. If it is true smoking dope causes unwanted illness then the areas prone to trouble from smoking cigars will also be similarly affected by this method of smoking, if done repeatedly.
 

Shredder111

Well-Known Member
This is true, but wouldn't you much rather have a problem in your mouth instead of in crucial organs you would die without? Back on topic.
 

foolsgold

Well-Known Member
Well since on was on topic I will stay their. Don't cry about nobody caring about your post then bitch when someone offers something on topic. If your so worried get a vapor. And in the future probably some tissues.
 

jigfresh

Well-Known Member
If your so worried get a vapor.
I didn't really think about this as a permanent replacement to smoking, but now that I do: I would totally rather use my lungs to smoke than my mouth.

Lungs are actually made to filter things out of the air and clean themselves to keep going. I'm not saying they were made to smoke pot all the time, but they were much more desined to deal with smoke than your mouth.

I think if I smoked in my mouth like that everytime I smoked I would develope all kinds of mouth problems. Ever seen what chewing tobacco does to mouths, how about meth. Not saying it's the same, but nasty shit happens to your mouth, gums, teeth, and throat with constant abuse. And unlike your lungs, who with time should clean and heal themselves, your mouth does not have those regenerative properties.

I'm no medical expert so this is all my opinion, but yeah I'd rather caugh than have no teeth. And if I didn't want to caugh I'd buy a vaporizor.

HOWEVER, I still think this is perfect for my wife. She can't handle actually smoking, and on the rare occasion she needs/ wants to smoke (6 times a year) I just blow smoke at her (watered down shotgun). It (i think) would be nice for her to try this as an alternative.
 

Shredder111

Well-Known Member
Well since on was on topic I will stay their. Don't cry about nobody caring about your post then bitch when someone offers something on topic. If your so worried get a vapor. And in the future probably some tissues.

Whoa buddy, you need to settle down:roll: I have a vapor, but my topic is relating a better method of smoking.
 

Shredder111

Well-Known Member
I didn't really think about this as a permanent replacement to smoking, but now that I do: I would totally rather use my lungs to smoke than my mouth.

Lungs are actually made to filter things out of the air and clean themselves to keep going. I'm not saying they were made to smoke pot all the time, but they were much more desined to deal with smoke than your mouth.

I think if I smoked in my mouth like that everytime I smoked I would develope all kinds of mouth problems. Ever seen what chewing tobacco does to mouths, how about meth. Not saying it's the same, but nasty shit happens to your mouth, gums, teeth, and throat with constant abuse. And unlike your lungs, who with time should clean and heal themselves, your mouth does not have those regenerative properties.

I'm no medical expert so this is all my opinion, but yeah I'd rather caugh than have no teeth. And if I didn't want to caugh I'd buy a vaporizor.

HOWEVER, I still think this is perfect for my wife. She can't handle actually smoking, and on the rare occasion she needs/ wants to smoke (6 times a year) I just blow smoke at her (watered down shotgun). It (i think) would be nice for her to try this as an alternative.
You are partially right, but there is a layer in the lungs which sits right on top which is lost with a moderate amount of smoking after a short period of time. This layer doesn't regenerate. Though your mouth doesn't have the ability to clean itself, tissue regeneration shouldn't be any different from any other part of your body. To clean your mouth, you can just brush your teeth after a smoke session. It should be much safer than inhaling it into the lungs. More people pitch a tent in:lol:
 

jigfresh

Well-Known Member
I guess if you brushed your teeth every time it would make it a lot better. I think I'm too high all the time to make this work. I don't think I'd feel it, but I'm totally curious. When I get some extra herb to burn, I'm gonna try it. I'll also let you know how it goes with my wife.


:peace:
 

Shredder111

Well-Known Member
I guess if you brushed your teeth every time it would make it a lot better. I think I'm too high all the time to make this work. I don't think I'd feel it, but I'm totally curious. When I get some extra herb to burn, I'm gonna try it. I'll also let you know how it goes with my wife.


:peace:

Thanks a lot man! Please let us know how it goes!!:clap::weed:

Any other takers? Comon, there's thousands of you on here!?
 

mismos00

Well-Known Member
It definitely isn't a 'better' way to smoke (if that's your argument)! Definitely different though. I'd be willing to bet it would take more than 3 times the amount to get you high through this process.

Is mouth or throat cancer better than lung cancer? Is that what you're trying to argue?

What about weed repositories or smoking it through your ear? :)

Have you ever seen this...?

[FONT=&quot]http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/03/990325110700.htm[/FONT]
 

jigfresh

Well-Known Member
What about weed repositories or smoking it through your ear? :)
I think you mean suppositories. kiss-ass

And don't tell me you've never smoked though your ear. That shit gets you sooooo high.

But seriously, in high school I had a crazy friend drip liquid lsd into his eye. He can still see and we're 30, but I think traditional ways of doing drugs have devoloped for a reason.
 

Shredder111

Well-Known Member
It definitely isn't a 'better' way to smoke (if that's your argument)! Definitely different though. I'd be willing to bet it would take more than 3 times the amount to get you high through this process.

Is mouth or throat cancer better than lung cancer? Is that what you're trying to argue?

What about weed repositories or smoking it through your ear? :)

Have you ever seen this...?



[FONT=&quot]http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/03/990325110700.htm[/FONT]
Ok:roll: Answer this. Do you think this method is worse than drawing smoke into the lungs for the casual "smoker"? The answer is no, it isn't. Remember, a person can clean their mouth. They can't take a lung brush and brush their lungs outkiss-ass.
 
Top