The Impeachment Of Donald Trump

SoMe_EfFin_MasS_HoLe said:

I dont care what or who he is. Trump is still our president and that's that. Dont you all have anything better to do than cry about Trump being president over a computer too a bunch of people who just dont care. You can stomp your feet, throw a chair, cry, cry, cry but Trump is and will be our president until 2024. You have no control over it and no matter what you do about it, it's not going to change!

Click to expand...

Funny thing here. I didn't even mention Trump in my post at all. I only pointed out that the guy you paraphrased was in fact a professional comic. Do you have comprehension issues? It seems you may, since you seem to think Trump's current term will last until 2024; either that or you don't believe in elections. Just remember that despite the propaganda which you've been programmed with, just saying things loudly doesn't make them true.

SoMe_EfFin_MasS_HoLe said:

If there was no evidence before other than hearsay (which is not evidence) then what evidence could possibly come to light now? O wait one more thing, what high crimes and misdemeanors was he charged with? I've not seen one articulated, not one specific crime! Blah blah blah does not count. What specific federal code has He broken?

Help me understand this! One side is saying blah blah, blah. The other side is also saying blah, blah, blah. All I hear from both sides is blah, blah, blah but not one crime has been said!

Click to expand...

More hearsay.

Michael Duffey, a senior official in the Office of Management and Budget, ordered the hold on the military assistance 90 minutes after Trump’s July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, emails obtained by the Center for Public Integrity

SoMe_EfFin_MasS_HoLe said:

You all cry about Trump being president but the truth is that even people in other countries wish they had a president like him. Look at the u.k. their party which is equivalent to our Republican party just won in a land slide election.

Click to expand...

LMFAO, do you just make this garbage up?


"Polls show that 19 percent of Britons have a positive opinion of Trump, while more than two thirds say they have no confidence he will do the right thing."

SoMe_EfFin_MasS_HoLe said:

I dont care what or who he is. Trump is still our president and that's that. Dont you all have anything better to do than cry about Trump being president over a computer too a bunch of people who just dont care. You can stomp your feet, throw a chair, cry, cry, cry but Trump is and will be our president until 2024. You have no control over it and no matter what you do about it, it's not going to change!

Click to expand...

China is very happy with Trump. "He is very easy to read and know what he's going to do next".

Meanwhile, the trade defict with China grew while US manufacturing shrank under Trump's watch. So much winning for your kind to gloat over.

And,

Mexico will pay for that wall.

ahhhhh hahahahahahaha

PJ Diaz said:

LMFAO, do you just make this garbage up?

Trump is so unpopular in the U.K. that some are lining up for a fight

Polls show that 19 percent of Britons have a positive opinion of Trump, while more than two thirds say they have no confidence he will do the right thing.

www.nbcnews.com

"Polls show that 19 percent of Britons have a positive opinion of Trump, while more than two thirds say they have no confidence he will do the right thing."

Click to expand...

Poland and China. Maybe I'm wrong about Poland though their government has given Trump accolades, but polls in China show that most like Trump.

Just think of all the witnesses the house is gonna call during the winter, spring and summer, ALL will be compelled to attend this time. If they don't want witnesses in the trial, they can have them in the hearings and investigations. As soon as Mitch commits to a kangaroo court trial in the senate, all Hell is gonna fall on the fuckers head, even if the democrats have to order the house Sergeant at Arms to hire a couple of hundred retired FBI agents to snatch the fuckers off the street and hold them in a rented jail until they squeak using the inherent powers of congress. I think the courts would act first though and courts orders will be on the way en mass.

Mitch ain't stupid, he knows what will happen next if he has a public (on TV) sham trial in violation of oaths, there will be a secret vote for removal (51%+) at the senate impeachment trial. Is the vote secret from other senators too, or can they vote to make it so? Could the be the required number of republicans who could vote secretly even among themselves? All those GOP senators running in 2020 could claim they voted not to remove!

Just imagine the witnesses this little news piece alone could dredge up, then there's Rudy and maybe his side kick Lev! Nobody has started squeezing the nuts of these stupid pricks yet, that will soon change. Nancy has got Mitch firmly by the balls and them long red fingernails are digging in, fuck up the trial and you'll get it all spring and summer on TV at public house investigations. They will wait for the courts to rule, but they know about the inherent powers of congress too, and will act first, this is black letter law and very well established precedent, both for witnesses, congressional rights and Trump's taxes. Donald is in for one Helluva ride this summer, whether Mitch impeaches him and he gets indicted, or the Democrats roast him and Mitch with investigations until the election. This situation would give Donald very long "coattails" in 2020 of the wrong kind and he could fuck up Mitch's senate majority.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyst on Ukraine email: This is better than Schiff imagined
CNN's Laura Jarrett and commentator Joe Lockhart discuss the implications behind emails showing aid was being held from Ukraine roughly 90 minutes after President Donald Trump spoke to Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky on July 25.

Most of the trumptards here are just trolls, but this one is So_FucKin_StuPid, I almost feel sorry for you little boy.

Some free expert legal advice for patriots.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trump’s Humiliating Impeachment Trial: WH On Edge Over Rules That Can Change Anytime | MSNBC

Donald Trump faces an indignity most Presidents have never experienced – a public trial of his conduct and fitness for office. In this original, exhaustive report, MSNBC chief legal correspondent Ari Melber details several constitutional and historical keys to understanding the trial process. Contrary to much of the DC “punditry,” Melber explains there is no way to predict key parts of the trial, because the rules themselves are unpredictable. The arcane process enables Senators to change core rules as the trial proceeds, for example, adding or subtracting witnesses and evidence, or shortening the trial in the middle. Melber likens that process to the Senate’s jazz improvisation, and recounts historical examples to prove the point – which means unlike most other DC battles, individual senators may have more leverage than Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Trump’s “fate” will not automatically be resolved by decisions made at the beginning of the trial, because they can chance. This special report, airing in the wake of the House impeachment, may answer many questions swirling around one of the most pivotal stories of 2019 and 2020. Aired on 12/23/19.

Trump's a stand up man... He'll let them talk.

dandyrandy said:

Trump's a stand up man... He'll let them talk.

Click to expand...

If the senate goes into a secret vote, things will get interesting real quick! Donald would lose his mind, but it would be too late the cut and run off to Moscow on AF1! Mitch needs to get rid of Donald or be tied to his burning carcass for the spring and summer, and likely lose the senate too and put his own seat at risk. He has got a formidable female veteran patriot running against him and he's in shit up to his eyeballs, so ya never know, there might even be a suge of youth voting this year, Trump will have motivated youth, to vote him out!

dandyrandy said:

Trump's a stand up man... He'll let them talk.

Click to expand...

When the courts speak as in orders and subpoenas, the cops act, so does the house, nobody will listen to Donald anymore, not even Bill Barr. They will need a nuremberg style trial for this bunch of assholes, Barr can be Goering, brazen and stupid to the end trying to explain it away. It's gonna be a shit show of the first order!

House Judiciary Committee says it could draft ‘new articles of impeachment’ against Trump
PUBLISHED MON, DEC 23 20193:10 PM ESTUPDATED AN HOUR AGO

• The House Judiciary Committee says it could draft and recommend “new articles of impeachment” against President Trump if additional evidence is revealed by former White House counsel Don McGahn.
• McGahn’s testimony is “relevant to the Committee’s ongoing investigations into Presidential misconduct and consideration of whether to recommend additional articles of impeachment,” the panel’s lawyers write.
• Democrats have been fighting for months to enforce a subpoena for McGahn to testify as part of the impeachment proceedings in Congress.

Lawyers for the House Judiciary Committee said Monday that the panel could draft and recommend “new articles of impeachment” against President Donald Trump if additional evidence is revealed by former White House counsel Don McGahn.

Democrats have been fighting in court for months to enforce a subpoena for McGahn to testify as part of the impeachment proceedings in Congress. They argue that McGahn’s testimony is “central” to parts of the House committee’s investigation into Trump, which is not yet complete even though the Democratic-led chamber passed two articles of impeachment against him last week.

And McGahn’s testimony is “also relevant to the Committee’s ongoing investigations into Presidential misconduct and consideration of whether to recommend additional articles of impeachment,” lawyers for the Judiciary Committee wrote in a submission to the Washington, D.C., Court of Appeals.

Click here or scroll down to read the House Judiciary Committee’s court filing

“If McGahn’s testimony produces new evidence supporting the conclusion that President Trump committed impeachable offenses that are not covered by the Articles approved by the House, the Committee will proceed accordingly—including, if necessary, by considering whether to recommend new articles of impeachment,” the lawyers wrote.

Trump was impeached on two articles — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — related to his efforts to have Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy announce investigations involving former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, and a debunked conspiracy that Ukraine, not Russia, interfered in the 2016 presidential election.

Trump allegedly withheld hundreds of millions of dollars in congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine while he was pushing for the probes into his political rivals. His administration refused to comply with congressional Democrats’ impeachment inquiry and has pressured numerous government witnesses not to cooperate.
more...

SoMe_EfFin_MasS_HoLe said:

You all cry about Trump being president but the truth is that even people in other countries wish they had a president like him. Look at the u.k. their party which is equivalent to our Republican party just won in a land slide election. Fact is people are sick of Democrats all across the board and it has been shown in the uk and soon with a vast number of other countries! I could care less what happens as I'm set for life but it is funny watching all sides rip each others wings off..

Click to expand...

The tories ran on universal health care and carbon neutrality by 2050

that’s Biden’s platform you dumb angry racist

SoMe_EfFin_MasS_HoLe said:

If there was no evidence before other than hearsay (which is not evidence) then what evidence could possibly come to light now? O wait one more thing, what high crimes and misdemeanors was he charged with? I've not seen one articulated, not one specific crime! Blah blah blah does not count. What specific federal code has He broken?

Help me understand this! One side is saying blah blah, blah. The other side is also saying blah, blah, blah. All I hear from both sides is blah, blah, blah but not one crime has been said!

Click to expand...

SoMe_EfFin_MasS_HoLe said:

I have a question. Why wont Nancy send over the articles to the Senate? And what are your thoughts on that Democrat dude switch parties and becoming a Republican?

Click to expand...

https://www.rollitup.org/t/democratic-rep-jeff-van-drew-meets-with-trump-to-bend-the-knee.1001856/

And Nancy doesn't need to send them over right away, if she was to have given them over to Mitch right away, there would be no leverage to have a full and complete trial (which was the reason Trump was giving at the end of the impeachment on why he was obstructing congress).

SoMe_EfFin_MasS_HoLe said:

If there was no evidence before other than hearsay (which is not evidence) then what evidence could possibly come to light now? O wait one more thing, what high crimes and misdemeanors was he charged with? I've not seen one articulated, not one specific crime! Blah blah blah does not count. What specific federal code has He broken?

Help me understand this! One side is saying blah blah, blah. The other side is also saying blah, blah, blah. All I hear from both sides is blah, blah, blah but not one crime has been said!

Click to expand...

The 'High' part refers to the office of the President, he broke the law asking for foreign involvement in attacking a political opponent. He also broke the law telling his staff to withhold the whistleblower complaint longer than the 2 weeks he was legally allowed. He also broke the law by obstructing congressional hearings. If you need more, you can add in his involvement with the criminal Roger Stone in his wikileaks scam with the Russians, also in the illegal hush payments to the playmate and pornstar.

House panel urges federal appeals court to compel former White House aide Don McGahn


WASHINGTON – The House Judiciary Committee told a federal appeals court Monday that it still needs to hear from former White House counsel Don McGahn about potential obstruction of justice, though the House voted to impeach President Donald Trump on other charges.

The committee argued in a 19-page filing that McGahn was a witness to several of Trump's efforts to undermine investigations, as described in special counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. McGahn's testimony could inform the House's arguments at the Senate trial and the testimony could lead to "new articles of impeachment," the committee said.

"That the House has impeached President Trump has not mooted this case and it has reinforced the Committee's need for this Court's expeditious resolution of this appeal," the committee wrote. After an eight-month wait for the testimony, the committee said in its filing that the "wait for McGahn's testimony should end now."
more...

SoMe_EfFin_MasS_HoLe said:

His name is Trump not Biden you tool box!
Even the president of Ukraine said no quid pro quo.
Trump didnt cheat but whatever helps you sleep at night.

Click to expand...

This is how the swamp is drained, it's crawling with Russian money, looks like Lev strikes again, Kevin can say hello to him at the investigation, they seem to know one another just like Nunes knows Lev, kinda like a conspiracy.
Now, wouldn't they be illegal campaign donations? It is Russian money intended to influence the election, they are part of a conspiracy.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#KREMLINKEVIN TRENDS AFTER PEOPLE POINT OUT TOP HOUSE REPUBLICAN KEVIN MCCARTHY TOOK DONATIONS FROM LEV PARNAS

The hashtag #KremlinKevin trended on Twitter after users pointed out that Rudy Giuliani's indicted associate Lev Parnas donated money to the "Kevin McCarthy for Congress" committee.

Many people posting with the hashtag also shared a clip of House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy comparing the contents of the Horowitz Report to the Watergate scandal.


#KremlinKevin was ranked at 20 on the United States Twitter trending list at the time of writing, with 13,000 tweets using the phrase.

more...

SoMe_EfFin_MasS_HoLe said:

I have a question. Why wont Nancy send over the articles to the Senate? And what are your thoughts on that Democrat dude switch parties and becoming a Republican?

Click to expand...

What are you thoughts on trump felching putin in helsinki
What about the time magnum sharpies dropped out of his ass


Happy impeachmas

DonJr.TheMoron said:

Most of the trumptards here are just trolls, but this one is So_FucKin_StuPid, I almost feel sorry for you little boy.

Click to expand...

They provide a useful service, since ya can't shit on Trump, they will do just fine! Besides ya gotta be pretty dumb to still carry Donald's water, even using a sock, same moron behind the sock issue. Imagine working for that asshole for free and rationalizing his corruption and treason, all the while moving further from reality and the middle of the country, way, way out in right field. A servant and apologist for evil, treason, corruption and stupidity on a monumental scale. Now that is profoundly stupid, that is a trumper, I see why they use so many socks.