The direction of the big bang

Seedling

Well-Known Member
And I already anticipate your next question:

Seedling: om nom nom nom *takes cock out of mouth* But how do we measure a different distance!? The football field is a football field and it is the length of exactly 1 football field!!!! DERP DERPA DERP! It is 300 feet exactly! *inserts cock back into mouth*

me: You took that measurement from the frame of reference of yourself, which is not moving relative to the football field. If you are moving relative to the football field you will get a different results. Also, watch the teeth please.
I fucking laid my shoe end to end and counted the numbers of shoe lengths, what the fuck did you do, stand on the moon and hold your shoe in front of your eye about a foot away and say that your shoe covers 3600 football fields on earth???

Are you saying that if I look at the moon tonight and hold my shoe up to it and the shoe is the same length as the diameter of the moon that the moon is really the length of 1 of my shoe lengths?????

You fucking idiot, you wouldn't know a meter stick and clock if someone beat you over the head with it like your step chump did when you were a toddler. Can you blame him? Fuck no!!!
 

guy incognito

Well-Known Member
It's not an observation, it's a fact.
Michael Jordan was a basketball player for the Chicago Bulls. He led the Bulls to three straight NBA championships in 91, 92, and 93. He won the NBA MVP award for 2 of those years. He then retired (quit) basketball.

He later returned to the NBA and led the bulls to three straight NBA championships in 96, 97, and 98. He also won the MVP award for 2 of those years.

He is an example of both a winner quitting, and a quitter winning.

How do you explain the evidence of the MJ experiment? I'm sure you will simply ignore it.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Michael Jordan was a basketball player for the Chicago Bulls. He led the Bulls to three straight NBA championships in 91, 92, and 93. He won the NBA MVP award for 2 of those years. He then retired (quit) basketball.

He later returned to the NBA and led the bulls to three straight NBA championships in 96, 97, and 98. He also won the MVP award for 2 of those years.

He is an example of both a winner quitting, and a quitter winning.

How do you explain the evidence of the MJ experiment? I'm sure you will simply ignore it.
Guy, I think you're trying to multitask. cn
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
Leonard Susskind starting from the beginning discussing reference frames in general and properties of inertial frames and the principle of relativity.

[video=youtube;BAurgxtOdxY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAurgxtOdxY[/video]
 

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
I was under the impression it was called space-time. If there was no (space) before the BB, how could time (space-time) have existed?
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
My equations and the math, with actual numbers are part of the diagram. Did you bother to look at it and understand every aspect of it?
Mathematical proof. Numbers are not math. Equations are not math. Rhetorical sarcasm is meaningless to me. Math must be proved back to the level of the geometry proofs. Prove a Triangle always = 180 degrees. Prove Pi R(sq) = Circumference of a Circle.

Have you ever done that? All of Einstein's math and all Math is proved to that level. Your conjectures were ruled out long ago. They can't withstand the Math, especially today. That is why we have Math. To prove conjecture and/or rule it out.

But, there is still much un-solved math, for you to ponder. I listed the top 10 in the Science section.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Quitters never win and winners never quit!

I know what the fuck I'm talking about.
No, a claim is worthless without proof. Mathematical proof of the proposed equations. You are not even in the same boat as Super Symmetry, quantum gravity, Cosmic strings and a couple of others. All 5 can be proved. PROVED.

But, it takes advanced thinking indeed, to see that all 5 were a hall of mirrors reflecting Mathmatically, the 11 dimension of the Standard Quantum model. It's how we have that Model. You get the Noble Prize for PROOF.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
It's not an observation, it's a fact.
There is absolutely no difference in this context. You're observations are real if the experiment was tightly controlled, you hope. That's it. Then others must duplicate and agree.

You mis-understand. There are no "facts" as you say. There is only the current Understanding based on PROOF. And that is under constant assault by your associates that want your job.
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
The board is slow tonight. Where's seedling been? Poor thing, must be such a burden to know things that no one else on the planet knows. :fire:
 

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
"You can't handle the truth!"
How about you try with some of the major questions I posed to you that you have yet to even attempt to answer? How can someone like you, that obviously has a modicum of intelligence, be so stubbornly obstinate when it comes to physics 101?

Did you watch any of Susskind's lecture? Did you notice the point he made how physics has always measured velocities relative to something? Have you yet demonstrated how to measure a velocity that's not relative?
 

guy incognito

Well-Known Member
I can just imagine him bobbing his head around like a pigeon right now and strutting around like he won instead of responding to your questions.
 
Top