The Democratic Party Autopsy Report

UncleBuck · Dec 25, 2017

Padawanbater2 said:
You can't even be taken seriously.

says the "progressive" who defends calling people f*****ots

UncleBuck · Dec 25, 2017

tangerinegreen555 said:
And it's a very strange kind of liberal that doubts the fucking obvious Russia-Trump conspiracy leading up to the election.

What kind of jerk starts a thread comparing Russian Trump collusion to DNC Clinton collusion?

It's like comparing Charlie Manson to a speeding ticket.

maybe he doubts the russian collusion story because his very own sources, like counterpunch, were actually infiltrated by and published articles written by kremlin disinformation agents posing as american freelance writers.

i shit you not, russia actually had kremlin agents posing as american freelance writers and certain publications were too fucking stupid to know it.

tangerinegreen555 · Dec 25, 2017

Politically blind

Unclebaldrick · Dec 26, 2017

tangerinegreen555 said:
View attachment 4063301
Politically blind

I think he is adopting the "new politics" rather well. I think he stands a good chance of becoming the Stephan Miller of the Justice Debs.

I meant Dems. Sort of.

Justin-case · Dec 26, 2017

UncleBuck said:
maybe he doubts the russian collusion story because his very own sources, like counterpunch, were actually infiltrated by and published articles written by kremlin disinformation agents posing as american freelance writers.

i shit you not, russia actually had kremlin agents posing as american freelance writers and certain publications were too fucking stupid to know it.

I saw this the other day on Twitter, representing online conversations. Notice the left truthers in red.

ttystikk · Dec 26, 2017

It's official; the Democrats are dead. Totally unresponsive to anyone who might actually be a constituent.
With Superdelegates like these, why even bother with a nomination process?

Fogdog · Dec 26, 2017

ttystikk said:
It's official; the Democrats are dead. Totally unresponsive to anyone who might actually be a constituent.
With Superdelegates like these, why even bother with a nomination process?

Its official what?

Go start that third party already..

ttystikk · Dec 27, 2017

Fogdog said:
Its official what?

Go start that third party already..

It's already been done. Until the Democratic Party wakes up and starts listening to their constituents instead of trying to tell them what to think, the thunder of feet leaving the party will be the only noise.

tangerinegreen555 · Dec 27, 2017

ttystikk said:
It's official; the Democrats are dead.

Sounds like Trump's twitter feed.

same 'it's all fake news' mentality.

Justin-case · Dec 27, 2017

ttystikk said:
It's official; the Democrats are dead. Totally unresponsive to anyone who might actually be a constituent.
With Superdelegates like these, why even bother with a nomination process?

You should change your avi to say, Roger stoned I am.

ttystikk · Dec 27, 2017

tangerinegreen555 said:
Sounds like Trump's twitter feed.

same 'it's all fake news' mentality.

I'd be much more supportive if they actually gave a fuck about my constituency... You know, those of us WITHOUT 7 figures to the left of the decimal in our asset management account. I'm sure that describes you, too.

You still believe their bullshit and get mad at anyone who questions your faith.

That's sad.

ttystikk · Dec 27, 2017

Justin-case said:
You should change your avi to say, Roger stoned I am.

Keep sucking that corporate cock, cuck. How's it worked out for you so far?

Fogdog · Dec 27, 2017

ttystikk said:
It's already been done. Until the Democratic Party wakes up and starts listening to their constituents instead of trying to tell them what to think, the thunder of feet leaving the party will be the only noise.

yeah, yeah. blah blah blah fire and brimstone.

You guys ignored what happened in the south when Bernie ran for prez and are ignoring what happened there again in November and December. Your story doesn't become true just because you regale everybody with it all the effin time. You might as well start preaching about the flat earth.

Go start that third party already. Free yourself from all contact with reality..

pleeez

dagwood45431 · Dec 27, 2017

Padawanbater2 said:
Say it out loud and redeem all the conservatives you guys railed against when they were making the same claim. If they were racist for it then, you're racist for it now

You're a moron. I wouldn't expect the same turnout from the black community as turned out for Obama. It's completely understandable why unless you're a fucking imbecile (you).

Justin-case · Dec 27, 2017

ttystikk said:
Keep sucking that corporate cock, cuck. How's it worked out for you so far?

I'm living the dream.

Keep sucking Putin's cock, useful idiot.

Padawanbater2 · Dec 27, 2017

dagwood45431 said:
You're a moron. I wouldn't expect the same turnout from the black community as turned out for Obama. It's completely understandable why unless you're a fucking imbecile (you).

I know why, you know why, and conservatives knew why when they were making the exact same claim that you are using now and your ilk were calling them racist for at the time

Do you believe a conservative who said more African Americans at the time voted for Obama because he was black were racist?

For the record, I don't think it's racist if you say it or if a conservative says it. The problem is your lack of consistency in the statement

PCXV · Dec 27, 2017

Padawanbater2 said:
It's a false dichotomy because we only had two choices last year

Pushing a third option isn't going to work logistically. You had a choice of Trump or not Trump. Your only hope at not Trump was Hillary. Any other vote or not showing up assured enough Republicans would vote that dotard in.

Is it the way it has to be? No, not technically. But realistically if you try to vote outside the two-party system you will detract from one party assuring the other's victory. In our case, letting the greater evil Republican win will not only hurt the entire nation, but destroy any chance of reforming our electoral system. Republicans in control aren't going to go for proportional representation or ending gerrymandering, they are going to further insulate themselves electorally by supressing votes, gerrymandering, cutting funding, cutting education, exasperating economic equality, etc.

dagwood45431 · Dec 28, 2017

Padawanbater2 said:
and your ilk were calling them racist for at the time

What in the fuck are you talking about? Show me where I did that, lying POS.

SneekyNinja · Dec 28, 2017

Padawanbater2 said:
I know why, you know why, and conservatives knew why when they were making the exact same claim that you are using now and your ilk were calling them racist for at the time

Do you believe a conservative who said more African Americans at the time voted for Obama because he was black were racist?

For the record, I don't think it's racist if you say it or if a conservative says it. The problem is your lack of consistency in the statement

There's a fairly subtle difference between "more black people were inspired to come out for the first black presidential candidate" and "black people have a herd like mentality".

It's natural that you'd miss it, nuance to you is just too tough.

dagwood45431 · Dec 28, 2017

SneekyNinja said:
There's a fairly subtle difference between "more black people were inspired to come out for the first black presidential candidate" and "black people have a herd like mentality".

It's natural that you'd miss it, nuance to you is just too tough.

Is that the dumbfuck's point? That voting for Obama was "herd like" behavior? Good gawd.

The Democratic Party Autopsy Report

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member